samboct
Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007 Status: offline
|
Kana Yes, I will happily admit, in public, to Titanic being one of my favorite movies and probably one of the best movies ever. There is no documentary that has been seen by a fraction of the people- and it's a damn good documentary. Kids taking history should see that movie- it's a wonderful example of the stratification of society that existed at the end of the gilded age- a time that the Titanic put an end to. The fact that you need to focus on what is admittedly a silly love story doesn't change this- it's like someone saying that Forest Gump is a bad movie because Forest is a moron. And Forest Gump is another good look at history- the character is a neutral observer- it's a brilliant device. Cameron put the love story on there so that you didn't need an omniscient narrator- but you met the main characters of the Titanic disaster, the captain, E. J. Smith, the designer Andrews- the nobility of the Strauss's choosing to die together, and the cowardice of some of the rich men who took the spaces in the lifeboats from women and children and even some of the characters of the time, such as Molly Brown. Putting the love story in the movie allowed the documentary to get made- it's just a device and if you can get past it, you may appreciate the brilliance of the movie. Chuck Norris has made some pretty bad movies, but one of my favorites of his is 99 44/100% Dead- again with Ann Turkel. And what was the dreadful mess that Bill Murray and Richard Dreyfuss did?- something that involved a psychiatrist and sailing- but it's really bad. Sam I've still been unable to wade through Cleopatra- Liz Taylor did have a really great figure and was damn pretty, but this movie is a lot of ham acting- and it cost a fortune.
|