FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto Alternative Universe: Iowa Presidential Forum Exposes Religious Right Disconnect From Reality quote:
I spent two hours Saturday evening in front of my computer watching the Religious Right's "Thanksgiving Family Forum." .... When you promote this type of intellectual disconnect, you expose yourself as the giant hypocrites that you are. I'm glad you gave us your own, personal view, based on your personal observation and analysis. That little snark aside, of course the above quoted "stuff" is strictly from the viewpoint of a writer who has his own very particular point of view. This is part of the guidelines of the site you took it from: Statement of Purpose Talk to Action is a platform for reporting on, learning about, and analyzing and discussing the religious right -- and what to do about it. ... We are prochoice, and we support gay and lesbian civil rights -- including marriage equality. Therefore, debates about the validity of abortion and gay rights are off topic. We understand that some people who share our general concern about the politics of the Christian Right may not agree on all of these matters. That's fine. Anyone who agrees with the purpose of this site is welcome to participate -- but bearing this in mind. It is our intention to take the conversation forward, and not let it be held back by debating what, in our view are or should be, settled matters of human, civil and constitutional rights. There is nothing wrong with that, other than the fact that you wish to project that your source is somehow "the final word", when in reality it has an agenda, and a bias all it's own. I often find misrepresentations of what Christian's believe, and say, or the failure to understand the particular logic and the special nuances of the words of religious believers in such sites and people. In other words, your source - and you - are just as likely (if not more so) to have mis-understood and "mis-quoted" things that were said and things that are believed, than the "religious right" is to have said or believed the things you impute to them. Tellingly, there are not direct quotes in your above screed, from any of the candidates. Bottom line, an ignorant, biased sources gives you something that reinforces your own biases, and you take neither the time nor effort to determine anything factual about any of its claims, and you then use it to spew more of your bigoted beliefs across the 'net, inviting others to your own little "amen corner". Par for course from you, though. Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|