Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Climategate: The Sequel


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Climategate: The Sequel Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/24/2011 9:41:59 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
It sounds like they were simply discarding anything or study which would prove their  preordained "theories" wrong.
It just *couldn't* be "the sun" could it? No money in that. No 100,000 beaurocrats sitting in offices making $100k per year off of the taxpayers.
No "assistant to the assistant of the vice assistant"running around the office saying, "this could be important!"
"Oh,...another important document?" "Put it on my desk and I'll have another assistant to the assistant file it in the, "could be important" file."
It always seems that they want "funding" provided by,.......the Taxpayers of course.
And they always use words like "could be," "may be", "might be", "could possibly be."
"The Ministry of Silly Walks."

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 11/24/2011 9:44:31 AM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/24/2011 1:51:55 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
 
Sooooo... wait... then... the sky ISN'T falling?!!  Shocker.



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/24/2011 4:11:04 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

 
Sooooo... wait... then... the sky ISN'T falling?!!  Shocker.




Well, technically with global warming it would have been "the earth is rising", giving the appearance that the sky is falling from a frame of reference on earth. Heat generally lowers density.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/24/2011 7:14:02 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
You don't need a long weekend to answer my challenge, TheHeretic.  All you need to do is to provide some evidence to back up your claim that "the science, and efforts to do something about the issue, have been hijacked to serve a sociopolitical agenda". That's all that was asked of you.  Nothing complicated about that at all.

Outlining what this "agenda" is, who is promoting it, and  why it is being promoted is the type of thing required of you.  Elementary stuff for anyone whose claims are grounded in a factual or rational basis.  Any 15 year old could manage it without blinking - so there are no excuses for you not presenting such evidence as you possess.

Unless of course you have no evidence to support your claim.  Which is, on the evidence to date - or more accurately, given your glaring failure to provide any evidence whatsoever to support your claims - looks increasingly like the most likely explanation. 

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 11/24/2011 7:32:21 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/24/2011 7:30:48 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
Thanks for your gracious welcome Firm.

You do seem to be attributing a position to me which I have never advanced here Firm.  I don't believe I have ever expressed an definitive opinion one way or the other on this subject here, other than recommending a certain prudence.  So there's nothing for me to substantiate.

What I did do was question that claim that "the science, and efforts to do something about the issue, have been hijacked to serve a sociopolitical agenda", and to ask those who advanced the claim for evidence to support that claim, if any exists.  As no such evidence has been presented to date, the status of the claim is unsubstantiated.

I did refute one explanation popular among the looney Right (to wit: Climate change is a left wing conspiracy to re-distribute wealth).  Perhaps you can offer an explanation of TheHeretic's claim with a little more credibility or substance than that particular drivel (Poor old TheHeretic seems unable to come up with anything at all, not that that is any surprise).  So, if you could, it would be an advance on TheHeretic's to-date feeble efforts in that endeavour.


_____________________________



(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/24/2011 10:46:00 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
What's "required" of me, Tweak? As I recall from our last exchange, what was "required" was that I never speak to you again. I'm quite ok with that.

I see this behavior occasionally, mostly from rabid leftists, who just aren't equipped to deal with someone who challenges their views from off the standard talking points, and their preconceived (bigoted) notions, about who might possibly disagree. I have thrown out a question, and offered a bit of my worldview. You keep showing up, demanding specifics and precise details about the worldview, but you ain't paid the cover, by addressing my question.

Now I probably have something you can read, bookmarked in a folder already, and I'll get around to it, but after the way you chose to address me last time around, you can just stifle yourself in whatever manner appeals to your kinks, and wait until I fucking well feel like looking. Right now, I'm still in the afterglow of a turkey coma, and a couple hundred miles of urban traffic, and you lose to the Twilight Zone marathon.

Do feel free though, to answer the subject I raised, before you ever stuck yourself in.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/24/2011 11:42:39 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
I wonder what would happen if the govt. made it abundantly clear that no u.s. taxpayer dollars would ever be involved in this?
No plush offices, no govt. paid employees, no 'nuthin.
"Sure you guys can do your little "global warming" thing but no money from the taxpayers!"


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 12:36:25 AM   
BanthaSamantha


Posts: 261
Joined: 8/7/2011
Status: offline
I know I must sound like a broken record by now, but I strongly urge people to take great care when looking at quotations, especially compiled quotations from a third party. It is very easy to take them out of context. People of all political affiliations have been guilty of misconstruing a quotation to further their own goals. Still others fall victim to these misconstructions and take them at face value. The fact persists that these selected quotations have no context and are exceptionally vague; It'd be folly to claim they are solid evidence of anything.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 7:18:33 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.



Whoever wrote this one had a clue.


Yes, such a shame so many will miss it.


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 7:38:01 AM   
geilematz


Posts: 86
Joined: 1/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

I wonder what would happen if the govt. made it abundantly clear that no u.s. taxpayer dollars would ever be involved in this?
No plush offices, no govt. paid employees, no 'nuthin.
"Sure you guys can do your little "global warming" thing but no money from the taxpayers!"



In case your "media" didnt tell you: exactly that has been the US governments' (all of them) attitude over the past years from Kyoto to Durban (ok that's a prophecy ...) world climate conferences




(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 9:55:54 AM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife



The fact that climate change is occurring is a foregone conclusion among those who actually have scientific credentials.




That man is the actual cause however is highly in doubt. He's never cause it prior and its been far far more severe. Why the rush to make man
the "boogie monster".

We should be preparing to ADAPT to the global climate future, NOT trying to stop it.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 12:10:14 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Thanks for your gracious welcome Firm.

You are welcome.


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

You do seem to be attributing a position to me which I have never advanced here Firm.  I don't believe I have ever expressed an definitive opinion one way or the other on this subject here, other than recommending a certain prudence.  So there's nothing for me to substantiate.

I wasn't really asking for you to substantiate anything.  I was simply asking your view about how science is suppose to work, in order to get into a discussion about "good" versus "bad" science.

And, this is for anyone, not simply for you.

To me, science is a system in which the personal is removed and made immaterial as much as possible.  Experiments and conclusions should be replicable, methods should be clearly outlined, and the data from which any conclusion made should be available, so that the scientific process can be judged, errors and omissions found (if any), and the conclusion or results independently verified.

Absent any of these steps, it simply isn't science, in my mind.  It may be based on statistical methods.  It may sound and look "scientific", but in reality it is not.

Am I missing any key component about the basis of the scientific method?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

What I did do was question that claim that "the science, and efforts to do something about the issue, have been hijacked to serve a sociopolitical agenda", and to ask those who advanced the claim for evidence to support that claim, if any exists.  As no such evidence has been presented to date, the status of the claim is unsubstantiated.

I did refute one explanation popular among the looney Right (to wit: Climate change is a left wing conspiracy to re-distribute wealth).  Perhaps you can offer an explanation of TheHeretic's claim with a little more credibility or substance than that particular drivel (Poor old TheHeretic seems unable to come up with anything at all, not that that is any surprise).  So, if you could, it would be an advance on TheHeretic's to-date feeble efforts in that endeavour.

I have my own views, and have discussed this issue before, but I'm not yet interested in going over that ground again right now.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 2:44:00 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Do you notice, Firm, how she promptly back away from addressing your question, on the grounds that she thinks you seem to be attributing to her, things she never said? Meanwhile, she's demanding I provide her with the inner workings and "damning details" of some grand conspiracy that she has assumed I'm arguing for.

I'll get around to her, when I feel like a have time to utterly waste. Good luck with your own efforts.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 3:33:45 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Do you notice, Firm, how she promptly back away from addressing your question, on the grounds that she thinks you seem to be attributing to her, things she never said? Meanwhile, she's demanding I provide her with the inner workings and "damning details" of some grand conspiracy that she has assumed I'm arguing for.

I'll get around to her, when I feel like a have time to utterly waste. Good luck with your own efforts.

This is TheHeretic's third offering since he were asked to supply evidence to support his claim that "the science, and efforts to do something about the issue, have been hijacked to serve a sociopolitical agenda".

So TheHeretic, we're apparently expected to accept that you've had time to post three messages of irrelevant snark but not enough time to find a single skerrig of evidence to support your claim ... but you might get around to it sometime .......

By now, sensible readers following this thread will be concluding that TheHeretic doesn't possess any evidence whatsoever to support his claim. Who could blame them? I believe the saying "Three strikes and you're out" is quite popular Stateside.

On the available evidence, there appears to be no reason not to dismiss TheHeretic's wild claims as so much ideologically-driven billionaire-friendly drivel - exactly what we've come to expect from that particular source.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 11/25/2011 3:36:25 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 3:53:33 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

FirmhandKY
I wasn't really asking for you to substantiate anything.  I was simply asking your view about how science is suppose to work, in order to get into a discussion about "good" versus "bad" science.

And, this is for anyone, not simply for you.

To me, science is a system in which the personal is removed and made immaterial as much as possible.  Experiments and conclusions should be replicable, methods should be clearly outlined, and the data from which any conclusion made should be available, so that the scientific process can be judged, errors and omissions found (if any), and the conclusion or results independently verified.

Absent any of these steps, it simply isn't science, in my mind.  It may be based on statistical methods.  It may sound and look "scientific", but in reality it is not.

Am I missing any key component about the basis of the scientific method?


I'm glad we seem to have sorted that little issue out.

Your brief description of the scientific method seems fair enough. However, if you're laying a basis for an argument that the current scientific consensus on climate change is a result of "bad" science, or scientific practices that diverge significantly from the 'scientific method' as it is normally practised, then all I can do is wish you good luck. You seem to me to be setting yourself quite an onerous task.

_____________________________



(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 3:56:29 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
And where will we find your answer to the question I raised, Tweak? Do you recall? That would be simply to say what other climate events and periods of change do we have data to compare with. I notice you prefer to harp on your bullshit query, without ever acknowledging what is on your own plate.

I have to say though, your impatience is hot. You'd be a lot of fun, tied to a futon frame, watching the burning candles aquire their pools of wax. Now I think I'll see if there is anyone posting I feel more like responding to, than you.



_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 6:42:10 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Your brief description of the scientific method seems fair enough. However, if you're laying a basis for an argument that the current scientific consensus on climate change is a result of "bad" science, or scientific practices that diverge significantly from the 'scientific method' as it is normally practised, then all I can do is wish you good luck. You seem to me to be setting yourself quite an onerous task.

My point on the description of the scientific method is to say this:  the original temperature data and the exact method that it was transformed into the conclusion that there is "global warming" of any kind is not available to anyone else, other than the core group at the UEA Climate unit.

There was an FOIA request for it.  The emails a couple of years ago, and now this bunch have very strong indications that the UEA scientists successfully attempted to circumvent the legal request for the information.  An investigation after the first set of emails found that th UEA Climate Unit was in violation of the law, but that it was too late to take them to court over the issue.

During the time that scientist not affiliated with UEA wished to see the raw data, they have been told several different things:

1.  We lost the data.
2.  There are legal restrictions on releasing the data
3.  The raw data is immaterial, it's just the results that are important.
4.  You can get all the data from other sources ...

... and other excuses.

Whatever the reason, the primary, raw data, and the exact method used to process the data to arrive at a rising worldwide temperature increase are not available, and they will not release it.

No data: not science.

No ability to review the process: not science.

If you wish a chance to read some of the current activities on this, plus data on the original requests:

Mr. David Palmer Explains The Problem
Posted on November 23, 2011 by Willis Eschenbach

Measuring Precipitation on Willis' Boots
Steve McIntyre, posted on Apr 20, 2007 at 12:37 PM

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/25/2011 9:12:59 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: geilematz


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

I wonder what would happen if the govt. made it abundantly clear that no u.s. taxpayer dollars would ever be involved in this?
No plush offices, no govt. paid employees, no 'nuthin.
"Sure you guys can do your little "global warming" thing but no money from the taxpayers!"



In case your "media" didnt tell you: exactly that has been the US governments' (all of them) attitude over the past years from Kyoto to Durban (ok that's a prophecy ...) world climate conferences






Matz, that's not the point, they think that if they keep pressing the issue that the government will one day fund this foolishness.
And boy did we dodge a bullet by not getting involved in that "KYOTO" nonsense!
But hey, even the U.S. Senate gets one right once in a while.


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to geilematz)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/26/2011 11:21:45 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
FR

The silence from the LSM is deafening. And where is Ken's obligatory strawman, its been at least a day and a half.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Climategate: The Sequel - 11/26/2011 4:38:19 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

Time to waste my time, I suppose.


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And that the science, and efforts to do something about the issue, have been hijacked to serve a sociopolitical agenda that has nothing to do with the environment is blatantly obvious to anyone capable of opening their eyes.


My! My! i wonder what this "sociopolitical agenda that has nothing to do with the environment " might be. Here, the claim that climate change science is a "left wing conspiracy to re-distribute wealth" is commonly offered by those who oppose action on climate change as said "sociopolitical agenda that has nothing to do with the environment ".

Doesn't that claim have it all - sinister conspiracies, devious leftists subverting knowledge science and the path of righteousness, an appeal to base instincts ("they're going to steal your wealth") creeping covert socialism ..... The only thing missing is a skerrig of evidence to back it up. Such a shame that this paranoid fantasy has nothing to do with fact, reality or climate change. No one needs to dress up the need to re-distribute wealth behind any fancy climate change theories. All we need do is point to reality - The OWS movement has made clear how the 1% owns so much and the 99% own so little.

So I do hope that the "sociopolitical agenda that has nothing to do with the environment" you're referring to has a bit more substance than this discredited drivel. Perhaps you'd care to enlighten us and reveal the damning details of this 'conspiracy". I hope (for your sake) it's a bit more credible than the usual nonsense trotted out by climate change deniers from the looney Right.

So let's hear you outline just what this agenda is, who is behind it, and how it hopes to achieve its 'goals'. Supporting evidence, (NOT the usual wild unsubstantiated claims and deluded looney Right fantasies) IS required.



First off, Tweak, an agenda is not automatically a grand conspiracy (why yes, after savoring the delight of prolonging your squirming and squealing for attention, I'm now going to give you a ruined orgasm), so all of this;
quote:

sinister conspiracies, devious leftists subverting knowledge science and the path of righteousness, an appeal to base instincts ("they're going to steal your wealth") creeping covert socialism .....

is just your own projections, which aren't my problem. The agenda is the accumulation of power and/or money. It is straightforward, plain, and quite simple. You've been repeatedly challenging a snip of my statement all along here, and not once have you addressed the whole sentence. It is right there, for anyone capable of opening their eyes. I don't think you are, which is why I consider giving you a response such a waste of time.

Did you, by any chance, bother to read the comment, and the particular email I quoted when I joined the conversation in the thread?

I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.

There are a couple ways we could read that. Whether he means "all our sakes" in the sense of the scientific community dependent on global warming for the next grant and the preservation of their own credibility, or in the broader sense of humanity at large, the author of that email clearly understands that other, counterproductive, forces are in play, and in control.

I promised you I'd pull up something to read, so here you go.

http://www.american.com/archive/2010/july/science-turns-authoritarian

That's the agenda that doesn't have anything to do with the environment, Tweak. Power. You want to see the money? Google up Al Gore's financials, or the Solyndra debacle for yourself.

Now, it's interesting that you would bring up the OWS protesters, because there is an interesting similarity between the environazis and the campers - all sorts of passion, but no real clue what to do about it. Have a read of this as well, from a greenie;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/02/environmental-fixes-all-greens-lost
and the follow up to the column, on his blog;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/may/05/green-problem-environmentalism

There's nothing we can actually do, but we'd all be better off as sheep in a stable-state economy anyway, so let's keep the ball rolling in that direction from this horse, for a while.

So there you are, Tweak. I hope it was anticlimactic. Don't bother replying to this, without first addressing the question I raised to the thread, and have directed to you more than once.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Climategate: The Sequel Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094