What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


RoughChances -> What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 2:47:02 AM)

I have a hard time understanding the draw to male submissives that present as "worthless and or pathetic".

For me, I don't own worthless things, nor pathetic...it might be a point of pride with me in that any lad in my service is a reflection of me...so if he is worthless and pathetic what the hell does that make me.

Don't get me wrong I get off humiliating them, but that is fun and games not part of who they are and what they are worth to me.

Am I alone in this?? Am I missing something??

Chance

The problem with the gene pool is there is no lifeguard...*Steve Wright*




MissKittyDeVine -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 3:16:19 AM)

You´re not alone.

Leave them to the InstaDommes and bratty princesses ...




thishereboi -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 3:35:30 AM)

It may not be what you are looking for, but apparently there are women out there who look for that.....  http://www.collarchat.com/m_3933035/tm.htm




bighappygoth39 -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 8:17:55 AM)

Yep, when I first started talking to my now partner, he told me that there are a lot of dommes out there who like all the 'you're a pathetic worm' name calling sort of thing. I personally go with what the OP says. I would see that as a reflection on myself, so I really can't bring myself to do that with a straight face.
I think I'll leave it to the weal and twue lot, instead. If it works for them, I guess we can't argue... [8D]




NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 8:23:19 AM)

I also don't get the pathetic worthless worm thing. I'm not interested in having, and would never want, a worthless worm or pathetic person in my life. I want a sub who values himself as a man, feels good about himself and realizes he's a valuable person, someone who has a spine and opinions of his own. In other words, I prefer a human being to a worm.




bighappygoth39 -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 8:36:09 AM)

I couldn't agree more. That's one of the reasons my partner was so attractive to me in the first place. His self worth, knowing exactly the sort of thing he desired and needed, him having a pair of balls and a backbone and still being a pretty strong minded man, was extremely attractive to me. I'd previously had a run of chatting to the subs who just came across as way too needy for my liking. [8D]




JanahX -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 8:43:45 AM)

I think the ladies that are looking for worthless and pathetic men .. are correlating worthless and pathetic to them having such low self esteem that they have no chance with any other women .. thus they will part with their money.
That or ... they are misandrists and want to literally abuse men to up their self esteem.




PeonForHer -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 9:12:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NiceButMeanGirl

I'm not interested in having, and would never want, a worthless worm or pathetic person in my life.


Well, I'm a worthless worm, and any Domme who tries to tell me different will be kicked up the arse and dragged out of the house by her ear.




NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 9:16:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: NiceButMeanGirl

I'm not interested in having, and would never want, a worthless worm or pathetic person in my life.


Well, I'm a worthless worm, and any Domme who tries to tell me different will be kicked up the arse and dragged out of the house by her ear.


[sm=rofl.gif]




undergroundsea -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 11:04:11 AM)

I think there is a form of masochism that relies upon disdain.

I often speak of what I call sadist-centric masochism. This type of masochism is fascinated with the mind, sadistic urges, or cruelty of the dominant. In realm of physical SM, this type of masochist is not interested in the sensation of a whip but that the sadist wishes to inflict the pain.

I think a dominant who treats others harshly has potential to appeal to sadist-centric masochism. Treating others harshly has significance in two ways.

First, it is easier to imagine raw, unbridled sadism from someone who acts in this manner. It is easier to imagine this type of sadism toward someone who is seen to be lesser and elicits no compassion.

Also, I used to think that an attitude of disdain carries potential for raw sadism. I realized during a conversation with an experienced emotional masochist that an attitude of disdain itself is a form of emotional SM.

The text above explains a particular form of play that is based on an emotional distance. To go back to the question, subs who present themselves at pathetic could be doing so to invite this type of play.

Another explanation could be a construct. By construct I mean a type of thinking that can make the submission seem more raw and real in a world where people do not have to submit and people are taught not to do things often done within BDSM. Because Fm goes against societal pressures and, statistically, against the direction of physical power, I think there is a greater tendency for a portion of the people to rely upon constructs to make the submission more believable. The idea that the man in question is pathetic could be such a construct. It resembles or overlaps with the ideas of those people who use female superiority as the construct. This assignment of who is superior and who is pathetic can help escape the societal role and provide a justification to them for submission.

One other explanation could be cultural. Indeed there are some circles, even some that fall outside commercial play, which are based on such notions. Someone whose introduction to BDSM came through such circles could think he must present himself in this manner.

Cheers,

Sea




Lockit -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 11:17:17 AM)

I don't get it all either, but its clear that there is a great majority of men that like this as they flock to the women that provide it as well as approaching many who do not provide it. My opinion of it all isn't what matters, other than in my own life, though I will jump real fast in responding to it all and the hassles it has presented in my own life situation or online involvement. Does it upset me? No. Do I like it? No. Will I change my response? Maybe, I don't know, time will tell. Does it make it harder on me sometimes because I look for something different and I of course have more respect for how I do things and think of people in general and what is emotionally healthy? Yes, sometimes, but I don't rule the world and it is what it is, I have to adjust I guess. lol Am I wrong for feeling as I do? I don't know. Maybe. That will take further thought on the matter.

Personally, I think all people matter and think there is something wrong with someone that feels they have no worth. I can't see it as healthy and productive and I sure wouldn't want a worthless person in my life. I cannot see people as worthless. Worthless to me... maybe... but not totally worthless. It is a kink I will need to understand better, but something I don't care what my understanding is or isn't... that I would not do. Let the goddess's and princess's and those superior, have it.




undergroundsea -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 12:15:03 PM)

@Lockit

I think one will find few romantic or emotionally-based D/s relationships that are based on such a dynamic. I think more commonly these dynamics revolve only around expression of SM in a harsh form. I think the number of women who enjoy this type of dynamic or can isolate the SM component is small, which is what creates the demand and room for commercial forms of this dynamic.

The number of such women, however, is not zero. For instance, I recently read a profile of a woman who holds a poor opinion of women who fit a particular image and description. She was seeking women of that type to contact her for harsh treatment, clarifying that they should not expect any respect or caring. This is an example of a vertical expression of a darker form of sadism.

Not everyone will accept or be happy with this type of play. Like other extreme kinks, it will make some people uncomfortable and that is fair enough. My post seeks to provide some possible explanations that might help understand from where this kink comes.

Your post brings up an important point: whether this type of kink is healthy.

From the submissive's perspective, this expression may or may not accompany low self esteem. It could simply be a construct where the submissive does not truly believe self to be pathetic. It could be a way to put self in a vulnerable position for sake of masochistic gratification without adverse consequence. Or it could be that this expression accompanies low self esteem and it is a way to each make the SM feel more real and to confront a vulnerability, much like how one might do with small penis humiliation or race play. I have no informed comment about whether the latter form is healthy or not. If confronting the vulnerability reinforces or aggravates the low self esteem, I would see it to be problematic. If confronting allows one to grow instead, it could help. I will add a comment from Midori from her seminar about catalytic play (play that leads to change): BDSM can be therapeutic and could accompany therapy but is not substitute for therapy.

From a dominant's perspective, I think whether the expression is healthy or not depends on how it leaves the dominant feeling about self, and whether it is done within each consent and responsibility.

Cheers,

Sea




MissToYouInRoma -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 12:19:28 PM)

Though there have been a few exceptions of people with extreme self-esteem issues, in my experience it's mostly hyperbole from the [online] submissive to intensify his distance between the dominant and thereby intensify his submissive feelings... similar to my being approached as "goddess" - I have yet to meet a man delusional enough to mean that literally. ;) In meeting in a vanilla setting, they may continue to profess I'm a goddess, but they don't self-reference worthless or pathetic anymore. [:D]

** edited for clumsy English

And I just noticed I posted from my temporary study abroad account. [:)]




bloomswell -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 2:04:10 PM)

It's roleplay and it's fun. One doesn't have to have low self esteem to want to be degraded or humiliated. It's simply a delicious kink.




PeonForHer -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 3:12:15 PM)

Hello Sea, damned good to see you again . . . .

quote:

From the submissive's perspective, this expression may or may not accompany low self esteem. It could simply be a construct where the submissive does not truly believe self to be pathetic. It could be a way to put self in a vulnerable position for sake of masochistic gratification without adverse consequence. Or it could be that this expression accompanies low self esteem and it is a way to each make the SM feel more real and to confront a vulnerability, much like how one might do with small penis humiliation or race play. I have no informed comment about whether the latter form is healthy or not.


I think that one of the underlying dilemmas that's key to this is that thrown up by a roughly psychoanalytic view of the mind on the one hand, or a roughly behaviouristic view on the other.

In that first view, you have some kind or another of psychic energy that builds up and needs to be released, under control, and in a safe way. It's a 'pressure-cooker' view of the psyche. Thus, say, a femdom who humiliates you within pre-agreed, safe boundaries, is a bit like the valve of that pressure cooker. She helps you to let off steam in a controlled way. You get humiliated, and you enjoy it. And afterwards, you have less of an ongoing urge to humiliate yourself, in ways that are not controlled, not enjoyable, and possibly harmful.

In the behaviouristic view, though, the basic theory and the indications flowing from it are entirely the opposite. Humiliation of any kind simply reinforces humiliation. A woman tells you that you're a worm, then you just feel yourself to be more of a worm, and that's that. Worse, because you're getting a sexual buzz from being called a worm, the reinforcement of that belief is all the stronger. A pleasurable feeling attached to an idea will strengthen that idea.

Evidence for either of these basic psychological views is sparse and what there is of it is disputed. For instance, I heard recently of a study that appeared to show that punching pillows (or other inanimate objects) doesn't actually release aggressive feelings, it actually makes them stronger. On the other hand, I also read recently of a test that seemed to show that there was no measurable effect in adults of violent feelings after playing violent video games.

Most boringly of all, I suppose, is the hypothesis that neither one of these views is correct. That, for instance, if you get off on being humiliated - or you enjoy getting off on humiliating someone else - then it may not make any long term difference whatsoever to your mental health. That's notwithstanding the obvious point that . . . it's usually considered pretty therapeutic to get enjoyable buzzes frequently, rather than rarely or not at all. All the shrinks of whatever flavour seem to be agreed on that, at least.




Ilayda -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/24/2011 9:11:38 PM)

I prefer the idea of dominating something that takes skill - or at least a certain level of care - to dominate.

That's not to say that dominating a self-proclaimed "worthless" gentleman doesn't require skill, but it is to say that men who present themselves that way tend to come off as, well, desperate... whether that's truly the case or not. (Oh, and I'd like to note that I'm aware I've a bias here.)

What makes me hot is the concept of having power over someone who wouldn't willingly give it to (m)any other(s), someone who has control over their life as much as anyone can. Someone who does not need my dominance to get by, but who is much happier when they submit to me despite that they have knowledge of their self worth. Someone who acknowledges what they are and is strong enough to submit anyway.

But hey, maybe that's just me. And it's not like I've ever had a submissive anyway. ;)




MariaB -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/25/2011 4:00:23 AM)

Undergourndsea, thank you for delving a little deeper into this. I found myself agreeing very much with the first post you wrote.
Its a bit like the submissive, male or female that dreams of being punched and kicked. To them S&m feels a little too game like. The punching and kicking feels far more like real abuse even though we all really know its consensual.
I have come across very few female submissives that enjoy that aspect of humiliation that puts them in a worthless place. It seems to be much more a male fantasy. Is this because day to day expectations of men are to be strong, providing and responsible? does society really reflect the true needs of a man? Is it because being put in a worthless mental state, these man feel the rawness of dominance and not just the game?
Also if new subs read too many financial dommes profiles on sites like this, do they get the impression that all female dommes require an element of worthlessness? I think for some it does and for others it triggers a deep desire to venture into that space.

I have a friend who has been married to her worthless sub for 10 years. They have two children and its clear that their relationship is a strong one. To anyone else he is a confident, entertaining and charismatic man who is highly successful in his career. To her he is the pathetic underdog. Knowing of at least one long term couple like this is proof to me that this dynamic does work well for some.




LillyBoPeep -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/25/2011 5:36:38 AM)

This is an interesting thread. :D
I won't even try replying on my phone (haha)




kalikshama -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/25/2011 6:11:42 AM)

quote:

What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic"


Porn.




Arienos -> RE: What is the deal with "worthless/pathetic" (11/25/2011 6:14:36 AM)

quote:

but it is to say that men who present themselves that way tend to come off as, well, desperate...


It may be you read it as desperate; it may also be a form of conditioning. I don’t personally project that image but experience has taught me few sadistic or even dominant women venture into the complexities of an overtly masculine submissive mind.




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875