RE: (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Politesub53 -> RE: (12/3/2011 9:35:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Dont project your friends' bullshit debate tactics on me... [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I note your latest style is to troll in threads you wish to get closed down, as they show your party in a bad light. Underhanded tactics, even for you.


However, feel free to debate the issue of Bachmanns statement if you wish.





Telling you the truth isnt projecting. I note you still fail to address the subject of gay marriage and Bachmanns remarks, and continue to drag the thread off topic.




tazzygirl -> RE: (12/3/2011 9:39:59 AM)

Not only her remarks, but the "family" business.




Sanity -> RE: (12/3/2011 9:42:46 AM)

Funny to me that you whimper and whine about "bullshit debate tactics" then wonder why this thread is about the bullshit debate tactic that was used in writing the OP

Do you support people who intentionally stir up racial hatred? Is that part of what being a "liberal" is to you?




Lucylastic -> RE: Michelle Bachmann Condemns Interracial Marriage (12/3/2011 9:42:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


There is far more evidence that Michelle Obama is a racist, so those moving slower than glass would be you and yours, dearest one [;)]



[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/obvious.jpg[/image]




Sanity -> Original header was a disgusting race baiting lie (12/3/2011 9:55:52 AM)

You wouldnt know Captain Obvious if he were living in your rectum  [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


There is far more evidence that Michelle Obama is a racist, so those moving slower than glass would be you and yours, dearest one [;)]



[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/obvious.jpg[/image]




tazzygirl -> RE: Michelle Bachmann Condemns Interracial Marriage (12/3/2011 9:56:20 AM)

~FR (lets try this again)

To get this back on topic.

Does anyone not see the correlation between the factual exchange and something that could have happened before the Supreme Court had to step in?

After all, this is where gay marriage is heading.




VideoAdminDelta -> RE: Michelle Bachmann Condemns Interracial Marriage (12/3/2011 10:01:22 AM)

If your post has a note on it that reads "message edited by VideoAdminDelta" on it, the reason is that I had to go in and change the reply title on the thread.  I know that some of you were just replying to the latest comment and they fault doesn't lie with you.

For those of you who are changing thread titles specifically to make personal attacks, these will be treated in the same way that personal attacks that are made in the content of the post.  If anyone needs a reminder, here is the communication that Alpha has made for this section.    http://www.collarchat.com/m_3863025/tm.htm




Lucylastic -> RE: Michelle Bachmann Condemns Interracial Marriage (12/3/2011 10:12:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

~FR (lets try this again)

To get this back on topic.

Does anyone not see the correlation between the factual exchange and something that could have happened before the Supreme Court had to step in?

After all, this is where gay marriage is heading.

only two people so far, well two that made an inordinate fuss
considering allthings.. they're not worth bothering about, or rather they arent adding anything to the actual topic and its repurcussions.
If they were to get into power, the funnymentalists would remove all civil rights back to pre 1900s to deny womens rights , racial rights, sexual rights and anything else they could destroy progress made over the last 100 years.
Controlling morality deserves a BIG government!!!!!!!! NOT




Politesub53 -> RE: RE: (12/3/2011 10:38:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Funny to me that you whimper and whine about "bullshit debate tactics" then wonder why this thread is about the bullshit debate tactic that was used in writing the OP

Do you support people who intentionally stir up racial hatred? Is that part of what being a "liberal" is to you?


You saw the OP as stiring up racial hatred, some of us understood what the Op was doing from the start.

As for me being liberal, ffs when will you ever learn who Maggie Thatcher was, liberal my arse. My disdain for Brown and Blair is also obvious to anyone with a clue.

As for me supporting people who stir up racial hatred, again get clued up and read my posts. In fact go read your own, starting with the thread you started, by accusing your Presidentent of schmoozing with racists.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125