RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:19:29 AM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

added:
Ya know Lucy,I don`t think something this bizarre could be dreamed up in Holywood....

But newty managed quite well......

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ahhh....the feeling is still there.....feel`n the love.....

An Iowa republican disses "the historian".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuo3dBP431k&feature=related

"You`re an embarrassment to our party.......

Why don`t you get out before you make a BIGGER fool of yourself."

Ouch!

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 12/6/2011 6:24:43 AM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 41

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:20:44 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

he is soaring, which means hes headin for a fall(hopefully)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 42

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:26:32 AM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

Oh no...."the historian" is scary talented and will save their party from Mitt.

LOL!

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 43

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:26:51 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

They do something nice and it only increases "liberal" hate, doesnt it...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

"Trump, Gingrich To Create Apprentice-Style Program for Poor School Kids."

Not sure if newty knows it but he`s running for the president of the United States.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/trump-gingrich-to-create-apprentice-style-program-for-poor-school-kids/

Maybe they can apprentice being janitors?

Gross idea but reality tv peeps will love it
the ten kids?
the reality is they will leap at the chance to be on tv, god help them.
this is a publicity stunt clusterfuck on the backs of poor kids
fucking disgusting

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 44

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:34:02 AM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

UPDATE: A senior Paul campaign source emails to push back, and hard: "We agree, of course, with former Speaker Gingrich — this is a country of people of enormous talent. Those who deliver thousands of babies like Dr. Paul and those who spend their time focusing on promoting themselves for profit. We even have those who lobby, but don't call it such because, as they say, they can make $60,000 per speech. While those of us in the Paul camp might disagree with Newt Gingrich about whether Donald Trump is the right man to host a serious political debate, we do agree New York is a wonderful place to go at Christmas. We are sure two average Americans like Speaker Gingrich and Donald Trump will have a wonderful time picking out gifts for their wives. We suggest a place called Tiffany's, we her it is quite nice this time of year and given their celebrity status they can probably get special deals and $500,000 lines of credit."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69792.html#ixzz1flV97WRK

Ouch!

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 45

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:36:20 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

what would be nice is if they could come up with a way to get millions of people back into retraining for decent jobs and people back to work in the REAL world.
And not pander to voters thinking they are doing something wonderful, when the people benefitting will be studio execs, themselves and their propaganda sucking supporters who can call it"nice" and get tingles up their shins.
ten kids, yeah, they couldnt use the money on not making any profit off the kids but help fifty behind the scenes
but you are right, its important they be allowed to make money off these "poor kids "

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 46

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:38:02 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

UPDATE: A senior Paul campaign source emails to push back, and hard: "We agree, of course, with former Speaker Gingrich — this is a country of people of enormous talent. Those who deliver thousands of babies like Dr. Paul and those who spend their time focusing on promoting themselves for profit. We even have those who lobby, but don't call it such because, as they say, they can make $60,000 per speech. While those of us in the Paul camp might disagree with Newt Gingrich about whether Donald Trump is the right man to host a serious political debate, we do agree New York is a wonderful place to go at Christmas. We are sure two average Americans like Speaker Gingrich and Donald Trump will have a wonderful time picking out gifts for their wives. We suggest a place called Tiffany's, we her it is quite nice this time of year and given their celebrity status they can probably get special deals and $500,000 lines of credit."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69792.html#ixzz1flV97WRK

Ouch!

MIAOWWWWWWW, LMAO

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 47

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:40:55 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

added:
Ya know Lucy,I don`t think something this bizarre could be dreamed up in Holywood....

But newty managed quite well......

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ahhh....the feeling is still there.....feel`n the love.....

An Iowa republican disses "the historian".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuo3dBP431k&feature=related

"You`re an embarrassment to our party.......

Why don`t you get out before you make a BIGGER fool of yourself."

Ouch!

eating ones own is always ugly , but like a rubber necker, you dont wanna look, but its j ust to weird to ignore

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 48

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:43:02 AM

farglebargle

Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

Hey, at least JFK served his nation in uniform, unlike that draft-dodging Newt Gingrich...

If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

They could have vetted JFK like they vet dogs as well, wouldnt have hurt anything

< Message edited by farglebargle -- 12/6/2011 6:44:29 AM >

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 49

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 6:52:09 AM

DarkSteven

Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead.

Different times. I read that JFK was determined to have a political career, and had his family use their influence to get him into the service because he thought it was necessary for political success.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to farglebargle)

Post #: 50

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:10:42 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

I actually like this piece by O Donnell, even tho I cant stand himself
Regarding Trumps latest media attraction
too funny
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540#45562312

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DarkSteven)

Post #: 51

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:28:08 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Thats a stupid post, considering Obamas service record, and Clintons

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Hey, at least JFK served his nation in uniform, unlike that draft-dodging Newt Gingrich...

If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

They could have vetted JFK like they vet dogs as well, wouldnt have hurt anything

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to farglebargle)

Post #: 52

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:36:10 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

A veteran knows what a flag looks like, and a veteran would say what fuckin service record of Obamas? Why would he have one? Have the courage of your insinuations.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 53

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:40:53 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

theres that ODS again
surprise

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 54

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:46:05 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Leftists were waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond deranged over Bush... which is where you got your copycat ODS bs

Ever have an original thought?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

theres that ODS again
surprise

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 55

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:46:56 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Well the fuckin kid was 12 when the last scrip came thru the service in this country for fucks sake.

Somebody should vet these ignorant insinuations.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/6/2011 7:47:35 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 56

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:52:35 AM

Hillwilliam

Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Leftists were waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond deranged over Bush... which is where you got your copycat ODS bs

Ever have an original thought?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

theres that ODS again
surprise

pssssssst. The thread is about Newt. Do attempt to stay on topic please. We wouldn't want any GASSSSSSSSSP derails would we?

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 57

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 7:56:22 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

that was my point, off topic with his ODS

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Hillwilliam)

Post #: 58

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 9:15:58 AM

farglebargle

Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

If you didn't want to discuss JFK, why did you bring him up in the first place?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Thats a stupid post, considering Obamas service record, and Clintons

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Hey, at least JFK served his nation in uniform, unlike that draft-dodging Newt Gingrich...

If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

They could have vetted JFK like they vet dogs as well, wouldnt have hurt anything

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 59

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich - 12/6/2011 10:29:07 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

He wanted to discuss Kennedy until he realised it was making him look like a tit, then he changed his mind.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to farglebargle)

Post #: 60

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.109