Vetting Newt Gingrich (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/4/2011 3:56:53 PM)

I thoughtful article on the next notMitt.

"VOTERS MUST ASSESS every presidential candidate’s character, including his or her propensity to exploit public service for private gain. It’s not always easy to judge. Newt Gingrich, though, comes pre-vetted; he has a long record both in and out of office. And while the former House speaker insists that he never stooped to lobbying per se in his 13-year post-congressional career, he clearly did cash in on his status and connections, whether as a high-priced speechmaker or as an “adviser” to Freddie Mac — the ill-fated “government-sponsored enterprise” (GSE) in housing finance that is now sucking up taxpayer bailout money. All told, Freddie paid Mr. Gingrich a reported $1.6 million.

How forthright will Mr. Gingrich be about this now that he has surged to the front of the GOP pack? So far, not so good. At the Nov. 9 Republican debate, Mr. Gingrich claimed his job at Freddie was speaking truth to power: “I said to them at the time this is a bubble. This is insane.” But former Freddie officials told Bloomberg News they hired Mr. Gingrich in 2006-07 “to build bridges to Capitol Hill Republicans and develop an argument on behalf of the company’s public-private structure that would resonate with conservatives seeking to dismantle it.” Indeed, Mr. Gingrich proclaimed, “I like the GSE model,” on Freddie’s Web site in 2007. He added that “making homeownership more accessible and affordable is a policy goal I believe conservatives should embrace.” He likened Freddie to the Homestead Act and suggested a health-care GSE.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vetting-newt-gingrich/2011/12/02/gIQAIyKhTO_story.html




Termyn8or -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/4/2011 5:57:29 PM)

Gangrich is going to be the nominee ? Hello four more years.

T^T




Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/4/2011 5:59:34 PM)

Id like to play vet with him!!!!




farglebargle -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 5:48:51 AM)

Gingrich: Ran away from DC in dishonor once already, why would you think he's got the balls to do the job this time?




farglebargle -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 6:48:10 AM)

[image]https://motherjones.com/files/images/nydailynews_newt.jpg[/image]




LaTigresse -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 7:00:50 AM)

Newt hasn't got an ice cube's chance in hell.

He is just the flavour of the week.




mnottertail -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 7:31:20 AM)

Besides his resigning to avoid getting booted out of the house for his ethics violations, and his full support of the Reagan deficit debaucle, and his backing a health insurance mandate his promotion of action against global warming (on TV with Pelosi)...

I would say the Grand Old Parties vetters need more practice, they might get it right in a couple of election cycles......




Sanity -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 7:36:46 AM)


The GOPs vetters are exceedingly thorough while the DNCs vetters are practically nonexistent






Owner59 -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 7:43:53 AM)

Oh?

What vetting was that that didn`t take place?


Bullshit......


A better explaination......


GOP=[sm=river.gif]




mnottertail -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 7:44:35 AM)

Yeah, we saw that with Palin.  Thanks for the heads up.  I was wondering why that was.




mnottertail -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 8:26:02 AM)

I gotta see this guys birth certificate, Gingrich isn't his real name and why the fuck would he pick such a lousy last name anyhow?

Somethings wrong here.  I bet he was born in Vladivostock.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 8:27:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The GOPs vetters are exceedingly thorough while the DNCs vetters are practically nonexistent




That's the funniest thing you've written in weeks.




Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 10:23:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The GOPs vetters are exceedingly thorough while the DNCs vetters are practically nonexistent




That's the funniest thing you've written in weeks.

yeah they vetted palin and they vetted herman realllllllll well
oh dear gawd
what utter crap
but not a surprise coming from newsbusters of all places




Owner59 -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 11:06:20 AM)

Some harsh vetting............. from an Iowa Christian group.

"Judas"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9TZ6sIHVww&feature=player_embedded

Ouch!

They are running this ad in Iowa, now.






Sanity -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 11:11:30 AM)


Funniest part is, you dont realize how but the joke is on you leftists... [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The GOPs vetters are exceedingly thorough while the DNCs vetters are practically nonexistent




That's the funniest thing you've written in weeks.




Sanity -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 11:13:57 AM)


As a matter of fact "they" did

Let us know when you two finally figure out who "they" are

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The GOPs vetters are exceedingly thorough while the DNCs vetters are practically nonexistent




That's the funniest thing you've written in weeks.

yeah they vetted palin and they vetted herman realllllllll well
oh dear gawd
what utter crap
but not a surprise coming from newsbusters of all places





Owner59 -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 11:27:52 AM)

WEST DES MOINES, IOWA — A very confident New Gingrich asserted to ABC News Thursday afternoon that he will be the Republican presidential nominee.

“I’m going to be the nominee,” the former Speaker told ABC News. “It’s very hard not to look at the recent polls and think that the odds are very high I’m going to be the nominee.”

Look at the arrogance there,"it doesn`t matter b/c I`m going to be the nominee".Jesus.....talk about deluded.

WTF has this guy been the last 6 months?!

Cuz he`s up in some polls,he`s the winner?lolololololol!!!!

There hasn`t even been a vote casted and he`s pretending to be king.
OMG!....lol

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/gingrich-tells-abc-news-im-going-to-be-the-nominee/

The "historian" is looking a bit clownish.




slvemike4u -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 11:29:06 AM)

Let me guess..Republican voters ?
We have seen what that vetting process entails....to wit:is the candidate in question dumb as a stump? Will the candidate reject facts and go with his/her gut feeling?
Does the candidat in question reject science and all its teachings ?
Is the candidat in question a complet and utter hypocrite?
Once you answer yes to all those questions you have yourself a bona fide Republican candidate......lol.




Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 11:31:59 AM)

not playing your game sanity, the thread is about gingrich, not a newsbusters piece.go play with yourself.




Owner59 -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/5/2011 11:36:59 AM)

What a retarded website.

They`re actually whining and crying about Chelsea Clinton getting a job at NBC.




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.492188E-02