Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: HIV Discrimination


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: HIV Discrimination Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 2:34:29 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Im going to interject something here, from personal experience. A patient I took care of was a young female, with a 5 year old son. Aids. Her husband denied the physicians the ability to tell his wife. Upon his death, she discovered why he died and she and the son were tested. Mom was positive, son was negative.

A quick check of PA laws. I couldnt find a statute requiring the informing of a spouse. Law officials, yes, spouse, no. 13 years ago, that may not have been a requirement anyways. Im not saying mom doesnt have it. Im simply saying the way she contracted it may not have been of her own doing...


That is possible, but, and this isn't being racist or discriminating, just dealing with reality.  He is a thirteen year old black child in a low income family.  Dad isn't listed as a party to the lawsuit and isn't mentioned anywhere.  The whole thing, in my gut, screams single mother who was a drug addict.  Granted, she has to have cleaned up to have custody of her son, but that doesn't stop her from filing the suit looking for money.

As for the story above, while your search didn't turn up anything, I'm pretty sure that there is a federal regulation that would allow the physician to tell her.  Especially when you consider that he can be charged with attempted murder for infecting her.

quote:


I was curious about this as well. Could it be her health is failing? Not enough is known at this point.


That is part of what I have been considering.  That her HIV is advancing and she really isn't capable to taking care of him.  That would really screw up her suit, lol.  Still can you really imagine sending your sick child away to be cared for by others?  Does any parent ever think that someone else gives the same level of care to their child?

quote:


Again, we are assuming that her status is of her own making. Is it probable? yes. Is it possible she contracted it through someone else and she didnt know? yes.


It is possible she was involved with a drug addict and contracted it that way.  I would say even that those odds are pretty good.  But it still means she wasn't making good choices, doesn't it?

It still all boils down to the reality that she is really asking for major accomodations from the school, and from what I was able to read, major accomodations fall outside what the law demands.  Even as a nurse, when your kids were small, if they had friends over and one of them scraped their knee, did you double glove before cleaning the child's knee?  Probably not.  Caregivers for children outside of a medical setting don't always rush to use that kind of protection.  Not telling the staff puts them at risk, puts the school at risk for lawsuit and really makes it difficult for that child.  As a person living with HIV, that child, I'm sure has been "schooled" by his doctors that in a medical emergency, he needs to tell the people administering to him that he is HIV positive.  That wouldn't change for the school.  So imagine the shock and anger that would arise from not having been given advance notice.

< Message edited by LafayetteLady -- 12/7/2011 2:35:02 PM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 2:36:51 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Children can be (and often are) violent little monsters who gang up on one another for a wide variety of reasons, sometimes simply because they're bored. i'm talking about normal children here - kids with mental or learning disabilities are probably even worse off in terms of emotional maturity. Bullying and fighting will always take place no matter how many precautions you take, and if it results in the HIV kid's bloody nose, there's a very serious risk of contagion.


Instead of excusing the bullies and preventing a child from attending because of bullying, they should get rid of the bullies.


No one is saying that the bullies should be excused.  But often, no one knows about the bullying until after the fact.  In this case, that is a little late, and opens up that boy and his family to prosecution.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 2:41:55 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
You don't feel that there being consequences of some little shit using another child as a punchbag is a good thing, then?
It's about the only case i can think of where some kid who gets their teeth loosened in school might stick the little shit practising his nineteenth century dentistry with some comeback. maybe we need a lot more kids with HIV in the school system...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:00:34 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

It still all boils down to the reality that she is really asking for major accomodations from the school, and from what I was able to read, major accomodations fall outside what the law demands.  Even as a nurse, when your kids were small, if they had friends over and one of them scraped their knee, did you double glove before cleaning the child's knee?  Probably not.  Caregivers for children outside of a medical setting don't always rush to use that kind of protection.  Not telling the staff puts them at risk, puts the school at risk for lawsuit and really makes it difficult for that child.  As a person living with HIV, that child, I'm sure has been "schooled" by his doctors that in a medical emergency, he needs to tell the people administering to him that he is HIV positive.  That wouldn't change for the school.  So imagine the shock and anger that would arise from not having been given advance notice.


I agree care givers should all be informed. And, I have stated if that had been the school's reason for denial, the lack of ability to protect their own staff as a result of the mother's refusal to allow notification, then I would agree with the school.

quote:

As for the story above, while your search didn't turn up anything, I'm pretty sure that there is a federal regulation that would allow the physician to tell her. Especially when you consider that he can be charged with attempted murder for infecting her.


I cant find that law for PA. It considers it a felony if its not disclosed to medical or legal system (jail), if you are a prostitute who is positive and have sex, if you are pimping a prostitute who is positive, if you are a john who is positive.

But HIPPA law still makes it nearly impossible for a Dr to tell a spouse, depending on the state, unless the patient refuses to pratice safe sex.

For example...

4) If I test HIV positive, does my doctor have to tell my spouse or sexual partner?

No. The only sexual partner your doctor is allowed to tell is your legal husband or wife. Even then, the doctor must first give you a chance to tell your husband or wife yourself. If you don't tell your husband or wife, then your doctor can tell them. But even then, he is not required to tell them. If you are afraid you will be hurt or homeless if your husband or wife finds out you are HIV+, be sure to tell your doctor. The law does not allow your doctor to inform any sexual partner except your legal spouse.


This is Illinois law.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:01:45 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


Being 6'2 would not prevent you from being a jockey. Your weight would.



Regardless of weight, he would not be accepted as a jockey at 6'2" regardless of there not being a height requirement.  Yes, it would likely cause him to be overweight, since in the US, the weight limit for flat races (what we usually are watching, think Seabiscuit and Secretariat) is about 110 pounds, but someone that tall can't hunker down well enough to be aerodynamically desirable by trainers and owners.

There is no point is pursuing something that you will never have the ability to be hired.  Even for someone who is 4'11" and weighs in at 100lbs, breaking out of the training ring and actually racing is a shot in the dark.  My late unlce was a jockey.  He was never famous, and I don't think he probably raced more than a couple of times, then got hurt, trained and worked at the track for years.  He was the only man I ever knew shorter than my mom's 5'1".

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:06:02 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Explain to me how those modifications cannot be changed. 12 kids in the same house. Your point? There was 5 of us, and whatever friends we dragged in with us. We didnt all sleep in the same room.. or the same bed.


It's really simple tazzy.  The family isn't allowing the 12 kids in the house or the caregivers to know the kid is HIV positive.  Therefore, the family is preventing any reasonable accomodation.

When there were 5 of you, if one of you came down with Scarlet Fever, your parents would have let you all know what was going on and let you know the necessary precautions to take.

Not the case here.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:09:10 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

No one is saying that the bullies should be excused.  But often, no one knows about the bullying until after the fact.  In this case, that is a little late, and opens up that boy and his family to prosecution.


Unless its the infected student doing the punching, I dont see how its his liability. How many others are infected every year and do not find out until years down the road?

I will concede that if the parent denies that information to be shared, then it is her responsibility, in my opinion.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:10:20 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

It's really simple tazzy.  The family isn't allowing the 12 kids in the house or the caregivers to know the kid is HIV positive.  Therefore, the family is preventing any reasonable accomodation.

When there were 5 of you, if one of you came down with Scarlet Fever, your parents would have let you all know what was going on and let you know the necessary precautions to take.

Not the case here.



We addressed that part already.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:15:04 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

So now we come to the crux of the matter. Money. Its always about money. Which is why the school asked the courts to have their decision reviewed. Either way, this is going to cost the school money.

It has nothing to do with the kids HIV status. Which is illegal to discriminate against the kid for that status.

This has to do with money.


Actually it has to do with both.  Discrimination is valid if the accomodations necessary "cannot be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level by reasonable modifications."  Without wanting to permit notification, the risk can not be reduced to an acceptable level by reasonable modifications.  So that covers the boy's HIV status.

As for the money, yes, the school has an obligation to protect themselves from future litigation that could result from the situation the family is asking the school to accept.

Can you honestly say, AS A NURSE, that if you were on staff at that school, whether it be school nurse, teacher, or the in house caregivers, that if your caring for this child somehow resulted in you becoming HIV positive because you were never told of his status, that you wouldn't sue the school?  Nobody is that much of a saint.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:21:49 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Actually it has to do with both.  Discrimination is valid if the accomodations necessary "cannot be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level by reasonable modifications."  Without wanting to permit notification, the risk can not be reduced to an acceptable level by reasonable modifications.  So that covers the boy's HIV status.


Yep, I agree, and said I would have been with the school had that been their initial complaint. Not that they could not accommodate, but that the parent's refusal made accommodation more difficult.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:23:30 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
In discrimination cases here in Australia, the law provides for an Anti-Discrimination Board (ADB) to oversee the operation of the act, hear complaints and make adjudications. The ADB has a broad educational role too mandated by law.

In complaint cases, the ABD is required to try to get the parties to conciliate voluntarily, then hold conciliation hearings, and finally make determinations of law. The process is subject to court oversight and all parties have legal rights of appeal. While parties can privately engage lawyers to represent their interests, there is no obligation to do so. Lodging a complaint, having it adjudicated and determined are all free of cost.

While I'm unaware if similar bodies exist in the US, it could be that this mechanism would provide a far better resolution of cases such as this than going straight to lawyers and the courts .... it would certainly be far cheaper for all concerned.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 12/7/2011 3:27:38 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:38:40 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

You don't feel that there being consequences of some little shit using another child as a punchbag is a good thing, then?
It's about the only case i can think of where some kid who gets their teeth loosened in school might stick the little shit practising his nineteenth century dentistry with some comeback. maybe we need a lot more kids with HIV in the school system...


I don't think that if some kid is a bully he deserves to get HIV, no.

But the reality is that I am looking at both sides from a completely legal standpoint.  If you had read my previous posts, you would see that I have said, both sides here have some merit to their claims.  It isn't as simple as simple minded people would like it to be.

From what I have read, currently the scales of justice are tipping in the schools favor, and the family is the reason for that.  They can't scream "discrimination" while at the same time refusing to allow the school to make the reasonable accomodations necessary.  It just doesn't work from a legal standpoint.

This isn't about bullies, and the papers don't mention bullies.  The papers do mention that while it can lead to expulsion, and is completely against the rules, there have been instances of children, in this child's grade levels having unprotected sex.  So while you are going on and on about how bullies deserve HIV if they get it from someone they are bullying, what about sexual intercourse?  If this child engages in unprotected sexual activity, does the girl (or boy) "deserve" to get HIV for being irresponsible about sex?

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:53:45 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

But HIPPA law still makes it nearly impossible for a Dr to tell a spouse, depending on the state, unless the patient refuses to pratice safe sex.

For example...

4) If I test HIV positive, does my doctor have to tell my spouse or sexual partner?

No. The only sexual partner your doctor is allowed to tell is your legal husband or wife. Even then, the doctor must first give you a chance to tell your husband or wife yourself. If you don't tell your husband or wife, then your doctor can tell them. But even then, he is not required to tell them. If you are afraid you will be hurt or homeless if your husband or wife finds out you are HIV+, be sure to tell your doctor. The law does not allow your doctor to inform any sexual partner except your legal spouse.


This is Illinois law.


I agree, even the AIDS.gov site doesn't have a state by state listing.  The internet is a good place to search, but it isn't possible to find all laws for all states by a simple search.  There are alternate ways of doing it, but really I don't have the time or the ambition to do so.

quote:


Unless its the infected student doing the punching, I dont see how its his liability. How many others are infected every year and do not find out until years down the road?

I will concede that if the parent denies that information to be shared, then it is her responsibility, in my opinion.


While you may not see how it could become their liability, the law isn't so clear on the matter.  Even if the family or school would prevail in a civil suit, they would still have to go through the expense of proving their case.  The reality is that while most people would certainly empathize that the HIV student was bullied, the school's failure to let people know and the mother's culpability in that act make it highly likely that the school and the mother would lose.

You have to take into consideration that not only do we not have all the information that went back and forth between the school and the mother, the school likely took into consideration what accomodations would be necessary when making their decision.  I have a sneaky suspicion that before mom called the advocacy group, the discussion had already taken place about notification.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 3:59:26 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

While you may not see how it could become their liability, the law isn't so clear on the matter.  Even if the family or school would prevail in a civil suit, they would still have to go through the expense of proving their case.  The reality is that while most people would certainly empathize that the HIV student was bullied, the school's failure to let people know and the mother's culpability in that act make it highly likely that the school and the mother would lose.


That is what I was conceding too.

Maybe Im reading it wrong. To me, the school said.. No because of the risks to other students. Then brought up the parents refusal as an after thought.

If the school had said to the parent... "Ok. But in order to him to be enrolled, these people need to know" and then left it to the mother to agree or not to agree...

I just see that as a huge difference.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 4:02:40 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
While there are conciliation hearings for some things here in the US, it is rarely a requirement.  I doubt this mother would have readily gone to such a thing in this case.  There seems to be some money issues on her end as well as the school's.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 4:07:49 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
But that is the beauty of the media.  Things are not always reported the way they actually happened.  Even in the filings, while it may appear that it is the way you are seeing it, it doesn't mean that it actually occured that way.  I see quite a few things on both sides that could have been worded in a much more persuasive manner, giving more  weight to each side in this case.

Unless we get access to the transcripts of the hearings and all the supporting documents (which would be really interesting), we aren't really going to ever know.

Shit, we rarely know how these cases turn out, let alone get additional facts.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: HIV Discrimination - 12/7/2011 4:16:29 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
At least on a local level, I should eventually hear about how this ends, even if it doesnt hit national media. Suing Hershey isnt a small thing.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 97
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: HIV Discrimination Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.090