ArtCatDom
Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei I think Moore can be a bit over the top in his behavior at times, but he is presenting straight footage and interviews, and citing facts that are documented, otherwise he would be involved in countless lawsuits. Moore is a movie maker, so he made Fahrenheit 911 and presented facts, footage and interviews in an artistic and interesting way (It was a documentary, that's what a documentary is). He didn't make up the facts, or create/fabricate the footage. I don't see the controversy. No, that's propaganda, at least the way he does it. When artistic license takes you so far as to imply untrue things and portray things in a misleading fashion, it ceases to be a documentary. Just to scratch the surface of what's wrong with the film: 1. The film implies the Bush family is hevaily connected to Osama Bin Laden through the Bin Laden family. The fact is the Osama's family long ago disowned him. To make a reasonable comparison, this is like demonizing someone for having heavy ties to the McVeigh family. 2. The visit of Taliban members to Texas during Gee Dubya's term as governor gives the false impression Bush was somehow conencted to the visit. He was not. They were meeting with oil companies reps under authorization from President Clinton (before Clinton imposed sanctions on Afghanistan). 3. Continuing on the Taliban connections, he makes a big fuss out of Unocal and Halliburton being awarded contracts for the pipeline. He completely fails to mention that after Clinton launched missle attacks on Afghanistan, the plans were dropped. That was in 1998. The plans were again confirmed as dropped in 1999 and again in 2002. Can you say red herring? 4. The President Bush 42% vacation time assertion is plainly false. Just for starters, it counts time spent with foreign officials as vacation time, which is obviously misleading if not an outright lie. Starting to see what the controversy is? *meow*
|