Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 7:30:45 AM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline 		What's next? Faux News endorsing Obamas's reelection?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204791104577110573867064702.html?mod=ITP_opinion_2


_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 7:55:54 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		/snicker/

The GOP leaders have somehow managed the remarkable feat of being blamed for opposing a one-year extension of a tax holiday that they are surely going to pass. This is no easy double play.

Republicans have also achieved the small miracle of letting Mr. Obama position himself as an election-year tax cutter, although he's spent most of his Presidency promoting tax increases and he would hit the economy with one of the largest tax increases ever in 2013. This should be impossible.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 8:29:11 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline 		Looks more like a slam on their strategy, and Obama's game playing. Big difference between that and slamming their policy, which in the end is what matters.

"But then Messrs. Boehner and McConnell were gulled into going behind closed doors with the President, who dragged out negotiations and later emerged to sandbag them with his blame-the-GOP and soak-the-rich re-election strategy."




_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 8:33:51 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		This means that everyone accept the lunitic fringe doesn`t like what j-boner is pulling.

People will be talking about this around the holiday dinner tables............all over American.

And the naratives will be about failsure-boner`s latest anti-American stunt.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 9:17:20 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

This means that everyone accept the lunitic fringe doesn`t like what j-boner is pulling.

People will be talking about this around the holiday dinner tables............all over American.

And the naratives will be about failsure-boner`s latest anti-American stunt.


Nonsense. Go back to your room, adults are talking.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 9:56:06 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Once again he only talks to "himself" how grown up!!!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 10:01:44 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Because he is pouting, Lucy.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 10:17:21 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		sending the waambulance

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 4:34:56 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline 		I dont blame Wilbur at all, desperate times need desperate measures.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 8:51:44 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline 		Guys, I have to say: Putting our erudite friend on 'hide' was one of the best things I've done this year.

_____________________________



(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 10:41:05 PM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline 		How anyone, even Wilbur, can justify such political grandstanding is beyond me

_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 10:42:15 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Because he has backed himself so far into the corner that he dare not try and get out of it now... even when he knows he is wrong.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 11:00:04 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline 		I must have pulled a "Rip Van Winkle". When did the WSJ become a liberal anything? I never remember that paper being anything but a conservative bird cage liner.



Peace and comfort,



Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/21/2011 11:07:26 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		It used to be quite the read for business students. Murdoch bought it and it has become a joke.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans - 12/22/2011 10:27:06 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Looks more like a slam on their strategy, and Obama's game playing. Big difference between that and slamming their policy, which in the end is what matters.

"But then Messrs. Boehner and McConnell were gulled into going behind closed doors with the President, who dragged out negotiations and later emerged to sandbag them with his blame-the-GOP and soak-the-rich re-election strategy."


You wish. The repubs have been caught giving chutzpah a new name. Insisting that Bush t e m o r a r y tax cuts 80% of which went to the top 20% of earners totaling some 100's of billions, be made permanent while instead of 2 mo. extension on the $800 billion/yr. 150 0f which was over payment until now and suggest 1 whole year is as stupidly hypocritical as one can get.

Aside from the hyberbole the WSJ is politically correct but as usual...fiscally or financially self-serving.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 15
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> That liberal rag, the WSJ, slams Republicans Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094