Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Forget it RealO. I almost posted this earlier but dumped it. It's not so much people being wrong because they're ignorant, it is something totally different - point of view. For example I have said more than once that there is no such thing as inflation. Either something goes up in value or it does not. If the object's value has not been enhanced and it's price rises, it is the value of the money that has changed, not the object. We've actually been through all this some time ago. The discussion got into the time people used rocks for money and all that shit as well as why eventually there had to be "special" rocks to keep people from just gathering them up to get rich for nothing. I believe back then the example was seashells but who cares. The reason I dumped that other post was because the concept is difficult to articulate. The best way I can do it in short is to say that one looks at the situation like a dentist and the other like a proctologist. Or another way of putting it is that we both see the same baseball game but one of us is sitting behind first base and other behind third. Inflation is a term used by those with the store boughten education. They will always say others are wrong, and ironically while they are wrong in saying that, they are not wrong about other things. Actually what they say is not the opposite, it is just expressed inversely in a way. In my short intercourse with DK using the example of ten people, which was not my limitation, it is shown that money supply must increase with increasing population, I do not dispute that. However if that eleventh person pulls his weight then the added currency of whatever type does not cause inflation because of the value added to the gross output of the community. If the money supply did not increase, it would apparently or relatively increase in value. This is actually a "devaluation" of the true wealth which is what is to be purchased. In such a case those who saved up over the years would have a distinct advantage which could be called intrinsic interest in a way. But where the school taughten fall down is that they think it has something to do with population. This is a socialistic view in a way. What needs to happen really is for the money supply to grow proportionally to the wealth created by the members of the society in question. It has nothing to do with population, it has to do with goods and services produced. This of course is only a dream of a perfect world. Also, the tenets of the system I have drawn here actually do make the use of gold as a standard counterproductive. Money really only does have to be a ledger entry, but that only works when everyone is honest. Fat chance. No matter what anyone says about the people who run the royal scam etc., which is true, it is also true that the production of goods and services has not kept up with population growth. Due to the way things are, we can't even seem to waste less to be able to feed the world. However I am now of the opinion that we should not feed the world. Free food should come with strong contraceptives, look at what has happened in parts of Africa. Ever see the old Star Trek - The Trouble With Tribbles ? (I know another damn scifi reference, but it fits). So if the same percentage of the people work as did when the population was ½ what it is today, there are two choices. there is either twice the money supply or the money is worth twice as much. One or the other. And the problem with the gold standard is that there is no way to assure that twice as much mined and refined gold would exist with the doubling of population, or the ouput. The gold standard was just meant to keep people honest. It didn't work all that well anyway. ETA : a constant money supply would work out well except for one thing. Instead of raises people would have to take pay cuts periodically. Everyhing should keep going down in "price" of course but just try to get workers to swallow that ! "Well it's been a year so now everybody makes a dime less per hour". No way that would work. T^T
< Message edited by Termyn8or -- 12/31/2011 11:53:30 AM >
|