Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/4/2012 1:22:08 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		Yeh!

Here is a prime example of syntax terrorism or as one Judge said "verbicide".

As we can see the definition of vehicle could as well mean also your shoes!

So according to the state "WHAT" is officially "motor vehicles"?

quote:

340.01.(35) “Motor vehicle” means a vehicle, including a combination of 2 or more vehicles or an articulated vehicle, which is self−propelled, except a vehicle operated exclusively on a rail. “Motor vehicle” includes, without limitation, a commercial motor vehicle or a vehicle which is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires but not operated on rails.  A snowmobile and an all−terrain vehicle shall only be considered motor vehicles for purposes made specifically applicable by statute.

340.01.(74) “Vehicle” means every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, except railroad trains. A snowmobile or electric personal assistive mobility device shall not be considered a vehicle except for purposes made specifically applicable by statute.




anyone?





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/4/2012 1:53:01 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/4/2012 5:26:51 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		Wow!

Not one response on this???????????????

So much for ignorance of the law is no excuse huh?

Should have been able to rattle this off in a new york second.





_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/4/2012 5:32:25 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		not a problem, no takers on this waste of thought,  common footwear does not meet the necessary and sufficient conditions to be called a device.

No more to the story than that.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/4/2012 5:36:28 PM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/4/2012 7:56:40 PM   
outhere69


Posts: 1302
Joined: 1/25/2011
Status: offline 		Man, didn't we go through the same argument about 2 years ago?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 6:56:49 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		Not exactly but it certainly would come into play if we were to go there.

Its really simple and frankly I am shocked that no one has come forward with the correct answer.

It begs the question how anyone can be held accountable for law they do not understand?

I mean since ignorance of the law is after all no excuse


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to outhere69)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 6:58:00 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		WTG ron pick the non issue! 

Ignorance of the law is no exceuse!

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 7:08:44 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		You made the totally incorrect statement that the two disjointed paragraphs from some source unknown (but most likely from the cheesehead state) said that your shoes can be construed as a vehicle, now, having had many chances to see your 'legal' conniptions here, and seeing that you do not understand law, I gave you the legal view.

This also revokes the incendental opinion artifact that you brandish unskillfully out here regarding right to travel.  In codified law it is easily discernable that one needs a license to operate a mechanized vehicle on our roads.

Grab up your Blacks and check out the word, device.  You got one, you tell us, alla time. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 7:33:25 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You made the totally incorrect statement that the two disjointed paragraphs from some source unknown (but most likely from the cheesehead state) said that your shoes can be construed as a vehicle, now, having had many chances to see your 'legal' conniptions here, and seeing that you do not understand law, I gave you the legal view.

This also revokes the incendental opinion artifact that you brandish unskillfully out here regarding right to travel.  In codified law it is easily discernable that one needs a license to operate a mechanized vehicle on our roads.

Grab up your Blacks and check out the word, device.  You got one, you tell us, alla time. 


anything designed, a contrivance etc

r1 = 1
otter = 0

The question is once again what is a "motor vehicle"?






< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/5/2012 7:37:10 AM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 7:38:05 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		“Motor vehicle” means a vehicle, including a combination of 2 or more vehicles or an articulated vehicle, which is self−propelled, except a vehicle operated exclusively on a rail. “Motor vehicle” includes, without limitation, a commercial motor vehicle or a vehicle which is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires but not operated on rails.  A snowmobile and an all−terrain vehicle shall only be considered motor vehicles for purposes made specifically applicable by statute.






for that state.  read what the hell you are having gand mals about and it might not seem so bad. 

the pathetic definition for device is not out of Blacks.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/5/2012 7:45:09 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 7:53:10 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		its out of the one congress uses LOL

restating the code is not telling us what things are classified as a motor vehicle.  another dodge


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 7:59:24 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		The important thing here is that this shows how the dulocracy was created and how the slaves simply follow the marching orders of the american ruling class, people not with standing

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 8:10:55 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		yeah, i know this is the nietzschean transcend and perish.  

so the definition of a motor vehicle based on the law that congress gives for the motor vehicle definition, is not the definition of the motor vehicle under discussion?   You have some actual title code citations for that incredible bit of legal unconciousness? 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 8:43:56 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		the self propelled part only narrows it down for their purposes of that statute, meaning that even though shoes could be construed as a vehicle in the general definition it is not construed as a motor vehicle in the more specific definition.
 
Again, 'device' would rule out common footwear in the vehicle definition .
 
So now we are down to nothing, which is what we started with, there is no point, there is nothing of import in these two (separated by some 30 paragraphs redacted) chunks of cheesehead code.    It has no political or religious import.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 8:56:17 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

the self propelled part only narrows it down for their purposes of that statute, meaning that even though shoes could be construed as a vehicle in the general definition it is not construed as a motor vehicle in the more specific definition.
 
Again, 'device' would rule out common footwear in the vehicle definition .
 
So now we are down to nothing, which is what we started with, there is no point, there is nothing of import in these two (separated by some 30 paragraphs redacted) chunks of cheesehead code.    It has no political or religious import.


the footwear was not part of the question that you continually avoid! but you insist it was THE question.  I never said a shoe was a MOTOR vehicle.

another fail for you!

again what is a motor vehicle based on those definitions provided by the statute.

oh and a shoe is most certainly a device to protect your feet.  LOL

You know like steel toed boots!  welcome to rons wierd wierd world!

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/5/2012 8:59:22 AM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 9:08:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		there is no issue to sidetrack.  this is nothing about nothing as usual.

What is the issue? what is a motor vehicle?
in the cheesehead state, it is codified in:

340.01.(35)

Which seems to be fairly straightforward.

Otherwise, I pretty much know a motor vehicle when I see one, and it does not depend on definitions in cheesehead law, which only concerns cheeseheads, and not minnesotans, nor anyone else on the planet.




_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 10:00:08 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		tell ya what, I am going to leave it at that as this is the wrong board to argue this matter because while I have plenty of case law, it will end up like last time where case law was given in support that clearly stated the position and you all scoffed it anyway and thi sis considerably more complicate than that. 




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 10:02:04 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		render unto cheeseheads the things that are cheesehead...........and all that.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 10:04:58 AM   
xXLithiumXx


Posts: 723
Joined: 9/2/2008
From: Hell, Kentucky
Status: offline 		What the hell is the point of this thread?

I mean, wow.


_____________________________

If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?

Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like solitary confinement


You have to believe in yourself. -Tsun Tzu-

Resident Malkavian.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 1:10:19 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xXLithiumXx

What the hell is the point of this thread?

I mean, wow.


Lithi. If you EVER figure that out, please let the rest of us know.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to xXLithiumXx)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? - 1/5/2012 1:44:33 PM   
Anaxagoras


Posts: 3086
Joined: 5/9/2009
From: Eire
Status: offline 		Hill, as far as I understand it Real0ne is trying to make out even shoes could be vehicles, thereby limiting freedom even more. Early on he says:
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
the self propelled part only narrows it down for their purposes of that statute, meaning that even though shoes could be construed as a vehicle in the general definition it is not construed as a motor vehicle in the more specific definition.


Then after looking at what a vehicle is:
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I asked for the definition of a device from blacks law, which you claim to own. The 8th edition if I remember correctly. You did not provide it.

So, among other things shoes are not self-propelled, nor are they a device.


...R0 unfortunately doesn't address what the legal definition of a device would be but appeals to the more general use of the word:
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
oh and a shoe is most certainly a device to protect your feet. LOL


However, simple reading of the text shows that shoes could not be considered "devices" in the general context of a "vehicle" given in the definition R0 provides:
quote:

340.01.(74) “Vehicle” means every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway…


nor in "motor vehice" given in the definition he himself also provides:
quote:

340.01.(35) “Motor vehicle” means a vehicle, including a combination of 2 or more vehicles or an articulated vehicle, which is self−propelled, except a vehicle operated exclusively on a rail.


...unless of course in R0's weird world shoes transport people rather than their legs or are somehow responsible for people being drawn across a given highway, and somehow are "self-propelled" devices.

< Message edited by Anaxagoras -- 1/5/2012 2:25:39 PM >

_____________________________

"That woman, as nature has created her, and man at present is educating her, is man's enemy. She can only be his slave or his despot, but never his companion." (Venus in Furs)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094