|
mnottertail -> RE: Ok Law Dawgs! Who wants to take a shot at this? (1/7/2012 11:29:26 AM)
|
quote:
Original post: You
So according to the state "WHAT" is officially "motor vehicles"?
As we can see the definition of vehicle could as well mean also your shoes!
quote:
you
So according to the state "WHAT" is officially "motor vehicles"?
Seems to be the original question, posted apparently because you are unable to comprehend the defintion. And an exclamatory that the 'vehicle' definition could include shoes.
quote:
you
Its really simple and frankly I am shocked that no one has come forward with the correct answer.
To which I gave you the answer to what is a "motor vehicles" (sic) contained
in the legal definition you originally did not and still do not understand.
quote:
You
its out of the one congress uses LOL
I told you from the get go it looks like cheesehead law and you then prevaricate quite clearly....so some academic dishonesty on your part.
quote:
Me
“Motor vehicle” means a vehicle, including a combination of 2 or more vehicles or an articulated vehicle, which is self−propelled, except a vehicle operated exclusively on a rail. “Motor vehicle” includes, without limitation, a commercial motor vehicle or a vehicle which is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires but not operated on rails. A snowmobile and an all−terrain vehicle shall only be considered motor vehicles for purposes made specifically applicable by statute.
so the definition of a motor vehicle based on the law that congress gives for the motor vehicle definition, is not the definition of the motor vehicle under discussion?
in the cheesehead state, it is codified in:
340.01.(35)
Which seems to be fairly straightforward.
my response to your question for about the third but not final time....
quote:
You
I made a flip snide remark about shoes and ron completely sidestepped the point of the topic, but thats alright. no one needed to know it anyway.
quote:
You
the lack of academic honesty demonstrated in your above post is precisely why I dropped it.
But in looking at your intellectual and academic dishonesty I had answered the question more than three times by now, and you appear to be the disingenuous one on all counts.
340.01 Words and phrases defined. In s. 23.33 and chs. 340 to 349 and 351, the following words and phrases have the designated meanings unless a different meaning is expressly provided or the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
(and it is as I said at the outset cheesehead law and you sort of dishonestly left out this bit.)
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/340/01
So, when we look at what is occurring here your academics are less than honest, and the intellect is wholly so.
SO ARE WE LOOKING AT A SKUNK SMELLING HIS OWN HOLE FIRST OR WHAT?
|
|
|
|
