fucktoyprincess
Posts: 2337
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mcbride quote:
ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess I guess I'll go with Voltaire on this one, and say to those who "name-bash" - I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. It's not about rights. That would seem to be a red herring. Anyone can say whatever they like, and if they don't agree to CM's TOS, they can say it on a thousand other sites. No one's suggesting eliminating the First Amendment, or freedom of speech in other countries, or even making these boards any less irreverent, but what's perfectly legal can be hostile, unworthy crap. It's about class. Some schmuck who goes on about "libtards" and O'Blunder or Newtshit just has none, and lowers the level of debate in here. That almost certainly drives off some who might otherwise make thoughtful contributions, and leaves the angry bottom-feeders who can't make coherent arguments. And thanks to the OP for the thread. I disagree that just because there are schmucks out there that there cannot still be those who make thoughtful contributions. Welcome to reality. There will always be schmucks, and they will always try to lower the level of debate. My general strategy, here, and in life in general, is to ignore them. But I feel that I don't want to waste my time with them trying to get them to elevate their level of debate. If that is their level, that is their level, as my father always says. If it makes you and others feel better for trying to get their behavior to stop - well, all I have to say to that is good luck. It's unlikely to stop, and I'm not even sure I would necessarily want it to. In countries like China, you could never refer to any politician the way we do here. One would get thrown in jail. Immediately. I'm not sure having the muzzle on people improves society. I still stand by my comment. Freedom of speech absolutely means that we can call our politicians names. If we want to have a country where that becomes a crime, then we absolutely will go the way of China. I don't disagree with your feeling about "class" - fine, it's not classy to refer to someone by name-calling. But asking people to stop, rather than just ignoring them, creates exactly the kind of atmosphere that existed in pre-revolutionary China - the notion that some people, like politicians, are "above" criticism or disdain, and telling people they cannot say hateful things about their politicians is absolutely putting a muzzle on free speech. I don't care whether it is Hitler, the Queen of England, or Obama who someone is talking about. If free speech means anything, it means you can call any of them names. I agree it's not the most elevated way to discuss things, but people are, and SHOULD be, free to do it.
_____________________________
~ ftp
|