DominantHunger
Posts: 57
Joined: 5/11/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Honestly, is there a such thing? By definition, a fetish is 'outside the norm' is it not? fetish noun 1) an inanimate object worshiped for its supposed magical powers or because it is considered to be inhabited by a spirit. 2) a course of action to which one has an excessive and irrational commitment: he had a fetish for writing more opinions each year than any other justice. 3) a form of sexual desire in which gratification is linked to an abnormal degree to a particular object, item of clothing, part of the body, etc.: Victorian men developed fetishes focusing on feet, shoes, and boots. I grabbed the definition because I wasn't sure if normality was relevant to the term. I thought it might just be the sexualizing of an otherwise non-sexual item. Though the definition does clearly establish the outside the norm requirement.
< Message edited by DominantHunger -- 1/29/2012 11:52:54 AM >
_____________________________
My mind has wandered, from the straight and narrow. My mind has wandered from the flock, you see? My mind has wandered, the man just said so. My mind has wandered, I heard it on TV.
|