Redmage
Posts: 14
Joined: 10/2/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wetrope Then he asked the punishing question, how much would i be willing to pay for her. I said nothing. He persisted and wanted $150 for 2 hours....Am I naive? Is this what money slaves are about, cus they can bark up another tree. That's not what's usualy meant by "money slaves" - that term generally refers to a "slave" who pays a "Mistress" for online or telephone Domination. What you're describing (a Dom charging money for his sub's "favors") may or may not be OK, depending on variables that you might not know. Being pimped out in that way is a not-unheard-of fantasy element for some Doms and subs. I don't see anything inherently wrong with prostitution per se, so as long as the sub is going into it with her eyes open and freely consenting, and as long as her own financial and emotional needs are being met and everyone comes away happy with the experience, then I can't see anything wrong with it. The "money slave" routine is a little different. There, as long as the professional relationship is clearly established I can't see a problem with it. That is, if a man wants to pay a woman for online Domination then I think that's a poor use of his money, but he's a grownup and it's his business. The problem comes in, I think, when the professional relationship is unclear. If a woman is telling the man that she'll give him more than just an online kick, once she gets just a little more money, or if she's telling a newbie that this is how all Mistresses work and he might as well get used to it, then that is simply fraud: the acceptance of money or favors under false pretenses. It's easy to say that the man is at fault for falling for such a scam. And there's even some truth to that. But the fact that he's a foolish victim doesn't make him any less a victim, or her any less guilty. This is no different from any other con game in that regard.
|