DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
All kidding aside, this is a seriously difficult question. I grew up in NYC and I've known some pretty nasty prostitutes (not in the "Biblical" sense). I knew and dated a few "exotic dancers" and the only differences between them and street walkers are: 1) they work indoors B) a bit more pricey. I was involved with a young lady, back in 06 (I think) who had been unemployed for a time and was having trouble making ends meet. She refused to consider any other kind of employment other than her (very specific) former job ... until someone asked her to be an "escort" (That's pronounced: "High-priced hooker" for those of you in Poughkeepsie). She came to me with the idea like it was the heavens opening up and mana falling from the sky. I told her, if she took the job, we were through. I also have no moral objection. It's your body do with it as you will; just don't ask me to treat you like every other lady I meet. I won't. There's a reason for it, though ... It has been my experience that ladies that work as dancers/hookers/escorts/whatever become jaded in a very distinct way, after a time. I don't know if it's a matter of looking at men as nothing more than a paycheck or something deeper (like an inward anger that they're "forced" into this by whatever circumstances). Either way, I have seen the changes happen to all those I knew before they entered that line of work and have observed the same behavior in those I hadn't known, previously. So, while a part of me says: "Wait! You want to pay me for having sex? Wow! There is a God!", an even bigger part of me just feels that I would start to see ladies differently and I don't want that. There's another element, here. I once was in a relationship with a lady that had a ton of money and liked to throw it around. That was not a problem, at all. I can graciously accept gifts in the spirit in which they're intended. Then, she started changing the clothes I wore. I've never been much of a "clothes horse" so, I had no issue with that. As time went on, she started very subtly ... very passively "demanding" other changes. Small ones at first, to be sure (like the clothing, etc.) but, they started getting to be a bit much. This is (I think) where the difference in dominance and submission may come in. I think any situation like this would vest a decent amount of power/control with the spender. I believe it's inherent. That would present more of a problem (I think) for a dominant type. I'm an easy guy to get along with in a relationship and I've even been known to acquiesce to certain things (she wants the bedroom done in pink/whatever) but, there are lines ... things that are important (she wants to paint my guitar pink) that just are not negotiable. I think the kind of person that we are (D/s) has to enter the equation. I am not saying that all submissives have the potential to be a whore. I'm saying that those rare few that truly are submissive would have less issue with this type of arrangement than someone who is dominant, certainly. Peace and comfort, Michael
< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 1/30/2012 5:21:17 PM >
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|