RE: Should she be allowed to run? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


hlen5 -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (1/31/2012 4:22:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble


quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


Do you mean that she should be allowed to run??


I think entitled to run would better describe my viewpoint. I'm not comfortable with an American citizen being denied the opportunity to seek office in America.



Thanks for clarifying, I like the way you put it better too!

EFFormatting.






subrob1967 -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (1/31/2012 4:25:07 PM)

Since the USA doesn't recognize an official language, she has every right to run, unless local laws prohibit it. Since Bita did the legwork, and didn't find anything that prohibits a non English speaking American from holding office, she should be eligible to run.

That's not to say I don't find it a sad commentary that this woman seems to have gone out of her way to avoid learning English, especially in a border state like Arizona.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (1/31/2012 4:27:34 PM)

This is a tough one for me. My liberal side wants to support her effort to run. However, if she wins, she is going to be on a council that presumably conducts all its business in English. And then what is supposed to happen to enable her to serve? A permanent interpreter on the council? And whose responsibility is it to pay for the interpreter? The city, or should the woman running pay personally for it?

I don't see anything wrong with the country's various bodies of government agreeing that English will be their language of operation. For example, Canada, a bilingual country, requires people to know both French and English in order to serve in certain government jobs (even non-elected positions). So I see nothing wrong with a U.S. governmental body (at the federal, state, or local level) saying that English is their language of operation.

There is also the fact that English can be learned. All she has to do is take some ESL courses and improve her English, and then run again once she has improved. I don't see this as an onerous burden. It is not as if someone is asking a blind person to see, or asking a black person to be white (impossibilities). One is asking her to fulfill a requirement that is completely acceptable.

There are many jobs in this country that you cannot do unless you have a certain level of education. Or belong to a union (for example, even actors belong to a union). While these are impositions on hire, they are reasonable, and serve a useful purpose - and are attainable by someone through effort. So no one is ever shut out, so to speak. Why is this requirement any different?

So, thinking this through from all angles, I think it is okay for her bid to run to be stopped. Her supporters should pay for some ESL classes for her, and equip her to run in the future.




TheHeretic -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (1/31/2012 10:23:46 PM)

I think she has every right to run, and if a law says otherwise, take it all the way to the Supreme Court.

That said, I also think her opponents have every right to make her questionable ability to perform the duties of the job a campaign issue.





tazzygirl -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 12:54:00 AM)

quote:

Since the USA doesn't recognize an official language, she has every right to run, unless local laws prohibit it. Since Bita did the legwork, and didn't find anything that prohibits a non English speaking American from holding office, she should be eligible to run.


Bita didnt. But Zonie did.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4018595




tazzygirl -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 1:01:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I think she has every right to run, and if a law says otherwise, take it all the way to the Supreme Court.

That said, I also think her opponents have every right to make her questionable ability to perform the duties of the job a campaign issue.




I almost agree with you.

lol fancy that!

But local law states otherwise. And, yes, that can be appealed. However, cost will be a factor. Not the cost of the appeal, but the cost of her holding office. Will she need a translator to be paid for by the city? I could almost accept that. Then, while discussing this with the man, he mentioned the ADA laws. This is not covered as a disability. Being deaf, or mute, or blind isnt the same as being born in a country where you did not learn the legal language. And I think that is a major point. While she may have learned the local language, it wont be only locals she will interact with. Any mistakes she makes as a result of her lack of proficiency in English would be carried by the people she represents.

I can see this turning into an emotional issue.




kalikshama -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 5:38:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

WTF doesn't know the language of the country they were born in?


Go to miami sometime and meet a couple of hundred thousand of them.


While in my time in FL I did meet many people who had been in the country for decades yet had not mastered English, I never met anyone born and schooled here who hadn't.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 7:05:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

WTF doesn't know the language of the country they were born in?


Go to miami sometime and meet a couple of hundred thousand of them.


While in my time in FL I did meet many people who had been in the country for decades yet had not mastered English, I never met anyone born and schooled here who hadn't.

I lived there for 18 years. Until around 1990, private schools were allowed by the state of FL to teach their curriculum entirely in spanish from K-12. I met people who were second generation who had exactly zero proficiency in English.




kalikshama -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 7:22:52 AM)

quote:

Until around 1990, private schools were allowed by the state of FL to teach their curriculum entirely in spanish from K-12.


Wow. What a disservice to the children - 12 years of education leaving with them only able to work and interact in certain areas of Miami.

My 20 something coworker says:

quote:

I went to a Spanish Catholic private school for kindergarten. No English, its true. That's why I ended up in ESOL when I switched to public.








searching4mysir -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 7:36:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble


quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


Do you mean that she should be allowed to run??


I think entitled to run would better describe my viewpoint. I'm not comfortable with an American citizen being denied the opportunity to seek office in America.




And should the cost of a translator come out of her pocket or the State's?




Zonie63 -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 9:42:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

WTF doesn't know the language of the country they were born in?


Go to miami sometime and meet a couple of hundred thousand of them.


While in my time in FL I did meet many people who had been in the country for decades yet had not mastered English, I never met anyone born and schooled here who hadn't.

I lived there for 18 years. Until around 1990, private schools were allowed by the state of FL to teach their curriculum entirely in spanish from K-12. I met people who were second generation who had exactly zero proficiency in English.


I can see it happening in some cases, though. My grandparents (third-generation Americans) were born in insular Dutch farming communities in the 19th century, and their schooling was somewhat limited, so they grew up speaking only Dutch. The local schools were in Dutch, too, and they really didn't see or speak with very many other people. But by the time my dad's generation was born in the 1920s and 30s, they were already speaking English at home. But then again, they really didn't have any political problems with learning English or accepting the fact that America is a predominantly English-speaking nation. Whatever political problems they had, they were with the "old country," while they deeply loved America and became very patriotic. Learning English was just part of the deal, but it was never really much of a necessity until they moved closer to the city.

But in this case, it seems that there's a underlying political component to this issue. Back in the old days, schools in Arizona were pretty rigid on being English-only, even to the point where kids were spanked for speaking any Spanish on school grounds. The civil rights movement likely inspired a great deal of cultural pride which encouraged embracing their own culture, as the previous tactics of assimilation left them with a bitter taste in their mouth. Then there are also those who believe that this territory rightfully belongs to Mexico anyway, so that also enters into the issue as well. It's not that they can't learn English, but rather, they won't learn English, since that might be seen as capitulating to "the Man."

On the other side of the issue, there are more than a few Anglos who feel that their refusal to speak English and assimilate to the predominant culture is a giant "Fuck You" to America, so they get riled up and demand "English only" legislation - among other things. Sometimes, it can get kind of ugly and tends to give a bad reputation to Arizona. We get made fun of a lot in the national media, but I just take it in stride.

Another angle to this is that we have quite a number of local residents of Middle Eastern and South Asian extraction some of whom, in terms of outward appearance, might be mistaken for Latino. I've seen them try to strike up conversations in Spanish, and when they realize they can't speak Spanish, some of them get angry. I saw this happen to a clerk in a 7-11 who was of Iranian extraction. The assumption is that, just because they're darker-complected, they should speak Spanish.

By the same token, there's the assumption that just because someone is white, that makes them Anglos who can't speak Spanish. I knew a Puerto Rican couple whose outward appearance made them look like they came from Scandinavia, but they were Spanish and native speakers of that language. They were at a baseball game once and heard this group behind them badmouthing them in Spanish, thinking that this couple couldn't understand what they were saying. They let this go on for several innings until one of them got up, turned around, and told them off in perfect Spanish.











Hillwilliam -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 10:38:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


I knew a Puerto Rican couple whose outward appearance made them look like they came from Scandinavia, but they were Spanish and native speakers of that language. They were at a baseball game once and heard this group behind them badmouthing them in Spanish, thinking that this couple couldn't understand what they were saying. They let this go on for several innings until one of them got up, turned around, and told them off in perfect Spanish.









I had a blonde haired, blue eyed Cuban born friend do that at Burdines. She was returning a rather expensive dress because the zipper had broken and the clerk gave her a hard time so they called the manager. The convo between clerk and manager was entirely in Spanish and mostly along the lines of "Trying to cram a fat assed size 12 body into a size 8 dress and goddam anglo bitch this and Goddam Anglo bitch that. She let them go for about 5 minutes until she broke in with an Hola. Then she proceeded to tell them about the little town on the north coast of Cuba where she was born and how pretty it was and how she was proud of her heritage until she had heard these two (who were American born by the way) speaking.

The money was refunded immediately.




OsideGirl -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 10:57:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


Another angle to this is that we have quite a number of local residents of Middle Eastern and South Asian extraction some of whom, in terms of outward appearance, might be mistaken for Latino. I've seen them try to strike up conversations in Spanish, and when they realize they can't speak Spanish, some of them get angry. I saw this happen to a clerk in a 7-11 who was of Iranian extraction. The assumption is that, just because they're darker-complected, they should speak Spanish.


I get people speaking Spanish to me all the time....and I'm the whitest girl on earth.

The issues for me are:

1) If she was born here and schooled here, why is her English poor enough that she requires a translator? This question would determine my vote, but not necessarily the decision about her ability to run.

2) If she doesn't speak or understand English, how will she be able to interact and serve? Everything would need to be translated, both written and verbal. Not only does this cost the tax payers in money, but it also costs in time and does a disservice to everyone else she is serving with.




slvemike4u -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 12:58:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

You have to ask yourself, why a US Citizen, born in the US does not have a proficiency in English.

Seriously ? You need to get out more,talk to more of your fellow citizens.Speaking for myself I'm often surprised when some of my fellow citizens are able to find their asses so as to wipe themselves [:D]




Politesub53 -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 4:52:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I think she has every right to run, and if a law says otherwise, take it all the way to the Supreme Court.

That said, I also think her opponents have every right to make her questionable ability to perform the duties of the job a campaign issue.





Surely the later would happen sooner rather than later, given the fact English is the official language for government documents ?




DaddySatyr -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 6:45:59 PM)

Actually, in the US, a lot of governement forms have been printed (by law) in both English and Spanish.

I'm a bit confused: When my grand parents came here (They entered legall) from Germany and Italy, they learned English, without any bitching and complaining.

I speak several languages and if I were to move to a country that used a language I don't speak, I'd be well prepared to learn that language (maybe even before I got there).

Is there something about people that speak Spanish that makes them feel that they should be different from everyone else? I have seen eveidence to suggest this.

I live in a city with a very large Hispanic population. I know that there's a certain percentage that arrived here, illegally (because I've known a few that live right on my block). I though it was a farcical exercise in the ridiculous when they "shut down" the city by not going to work and marching to "teach 'Los gringos' a lesson" about "forcing" them to learn English (Their words; not mine).

I have walked into stores in this city and been met with: "Joo gotta peaky panish. No peaky Inglish" immediately upon entrance. While I speak Spanish, the arrogance of someone wanting to sell me goods and demanding I speak their language to do so pissed me off. So, I went to a big chain store instead of supporting a mom & pop like I prefer to do.

Before I get jumped on; I've also been to places where the salesperson said something like: "My Inglish not so good. Joo peaky panish?" I was more than happy to stay and patronize that establishment.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




kalikshama -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/1/2012 7:03:38 PM)

quote:

I speak several languages and if I were to move to a country that used a language I don't speak, I'd be well prepared to learn that language (maybe even before I got there).

Ya, before I went to Costa Rica for two months I enrolled in a Spanish class and while I was in Okinawa I learned enough Japanese to be polite.

quote:

Is there something about people that speak Spanish that makes them feel that they should be different from everyone else? I have seen evidence to suggest this.


http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?ID=282

...Bilingualism persists to a greater extent among third-generation Hispanic groups, lending some truth to the claims from nativist and multiculturalist perspectives that an older pattern of language assimilation — mother-tongue extinction, in fact — has broken down.

But English hardly seems endangered. Not only is competence in English close to universal among the US-born children and grandchildren of today's immigrants, but even among those groups where bilingualism persists, the predominant pattern by the third generation is English monolingualism.

Much third-generation bilingualism is found in border communities. In places such as Brownsville and El Paso, Texas, the maintenance of Spanish has deep historical roots and is affected by proximity to Mexico. Many second-generation children, even though born in the US, may move back and forth between Mexico and the US with their families. Away from the border, Mexican-American children of the third generation are unlikely to be bilingual.

Other areas where Spanish has persisted are Miami, which has extensive connections to Latin America, and several Northeastern regions, such as Newark and New York, where Dominicans are concentrated.

Conclusion

The language assimilation patterns of today are not precisely those of the early 20th century, but they do not appear to pose any threat to English as the language that cements the nation and its culture.

The high migration level of the 1990s did not affect the fundamental shift towards English across the generations. Moreover, many of the main exceptions to the basic pattern are found in border communities where bilingualism is a historically rooted phenomenon, not one that has arisen from recent immigration.

Yet, bilingualism is more common today than in the past. To some extent, most children of immigrants speak the mother tongue at home, especially if their parents have come from Latin America. However, if they are born and raised in the US, they are highly likely to speak English well or very well. Among second-generation Hispanic children, only eight percent are not proficient, and some of those probably belong to families that move back and forth between the US and their countries of origin.

By the third generation, English monolingualism is the prevalent pattern. Bilingualism, then, is very much a minority pattern by this generation. Virtually all children and grandchildren of immigrants accept the necessity of learning English well.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/2/2012 6:44:55 AM)

Again, I will repeat what I said in my earlier post. What prevents this woman from taking some English classes and just improving her English? This is not like gender or race (something which cannot be changed - independent, of course, of the transgender world, but all of you know what I mean by this). She can improve her English skills if she wants AND then run for this office. I do not see why the language issue has to be treated like an immutable difference - it is not.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/2/2012 7:39:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

Again, I will repeat what I said in my earlier post. What prevents this woman from taking some English classes and just improving her English? This is not like gender or race (something which cannot be changed - independent, of course, of the transgender world, but all of you know what I mean by this). She can improve her English skills if she wants AND then run for this office. I do not see why the language issue has to be treated like an immutable difference - it is not.


Because almost no one takes responsibility for their own actions, anymore. Why should she put in any effort when it's so much easier to just get the PC Bullshit machine rolling.

This poor woman was too fucking lazy to learn the language spoken by (at least) 80% of the people living in her country. Granted, I'm sure it's a smaller percentage in her neighborhood because, having been incredibly lazy and not wanting to learn English, I'm sure it limited the ease with which she could live in an area where Spanish wasn't the predominant language.

Why should (worst case scenario) 250,000,000 people change their ways because 50,000,000 don't want to put in a little bit of effort?

How about a situation like mine where I am one of the only English speakers in my ward? Some day, will I have a choice between: "I'm the candidate that chooses to not speak English" and "I'm the candidate who chose not to learn how to read"? Why not? Why can't some purposefully ignorant person who chooses not to read be the next moron to cry: "Foul!"? Where does it end?



Peace and comfort,



Michael




mnottertail -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/2/2012 8:00:18 AM)

The current slate of legislators (and the elected of past times for quite awhile) do not appear to be capable of conversing in and possessing an understanding of english, so I don't see any unique and singular difficulty with her not hispikin anglase.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875