fucktoyprincess -> RE: Should she be allowed to run? (2/2/2012 8:25:10 AM)
|
DaddySatyr, yes agreed. While English is my first language, I speak multiple languages. And I have no objection to people wanting to learn and speak as many languages as they want (in their homes, in their communities, when they travel, etc.) But I honestly think it is absurd for people to NOT want to learn the predominant language in a country. Over 80% of Americans speak English. Around 10% of the population speak Spanish (and many of those speak English, also). And, according to statistics, most Amercian-born Spanish speakers do, in fact, speak, English. So, at the end of the day, only a small percentage of people in the country who were born here speak ONLY Spanish. I just do not see why one needs to cater to such a small percent. And to be fair, if we cater to the small percent of American born who speak ONLY Spanish, then why are we also not catering to numerous other language speakers who are in this country? What stops some other small minority from then claiming they have the right to serve in public office even though they only speak a language other than English. Why can't some some person, of say, Nepalese or Tibetan background, claim they have the same right to run, and conduct official business in their language. I see this as a slippery slope issue. In my mind, the FAIREST solution is to stick to English as our language of politics. If we start catering to the Spanish speakers who want to serve in political office, I want someone to explain to me why someone who speaks any other minority language in the U.S. should not be given the same right? And then suddenly we are going to have city councils in some parts of the country where the council members are not able to speak to each other at all. Does anyone really think good government can come from this??
|
|
|
|