DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel Being treated as second class citizens hasn't suddenly become offensive to atheists, it's been offensive all along. We're just in a better position to get equal treatment under the law these days. The most recent one of these church state separation cases that I've heard of involves a law suit against cranston west high school to get the "school prayer" taken down. I don't think not wanting the state to promote one position and refer to another position as evil makes someone a zealot. I don't think Julia Ahlquist is a zealot. The people who have promised to rape and murder Julia Ahlquist for testifying in said lawsuit. Those are zealots. Well, let's look at this logically. I don't know who this Julia lady is nor do I care, at the moment. If we're agreed that a "believer" that feels the need to impose their beliefs and will on other people is a zealot, than so is a non-believer that tries to do the same thing. In the example I gave, the town hall with Christmas decorations, using your logic, "believers" should be "offended" (about) 49 weeks out of the year (when religious decorations aren't displayed). I will ask, again: what about someone, believing in an old guy with a long beard and white robes is so offensive to someone who does not believe in the old man? I am not offended, when I see Muslims, kneeling to pray. I am not offended when I see someone not saying grace over their food. I shrug my shoulders. But the non-religious zealots ... the "God haters" run off in a tizzy when they see a believer exhibiting signs of belief. Also, could you please point me in the direction of where I might find the "separation of church and state"? It doesn't exist. The constitution says: "Congress shall make no law either establishing religion nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof". It's a "one-way wall". I am not advocating a new group of laws, instituting religious rites. I am advocating a little live-and-let-live which God haters seem not to be able to live by. quote:
ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr Oh, but you did use the "woo-woo". You even did so by linking us all to a definition of it. So, your above statement is false. Notice, please: I explained a position to you, if you choose to take offense go ahead Nah. I wasn't offended. I was trying to make a point to you (and point out the fallacy of your "I don't even use it" statement). I'm afraid the point didn't get through. I'm sorry. Peace and comfort, Michael
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|