PatrickG38 -> RE: Think there is a god and what is your evidence? (2/6/2012 5:12:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: PatrickG38 I never claimed science has all the answers, but there is nothing that prevents science from one day have all the answers to intelligible questions about the nature of the universe So, questions about the nature of the universe for which science cannot provide an answer are to be dismissed as not "intelligible"? quote:
ORIGINAL: PatrickG38 If everything must have a cause, god must. If everything does not need a cause, there is no need for a 'god' creator... As I said, turtles. No, it's not turtles all the way down. In fact, the whole notion of causality is deeply problematic. It works nicely enough when you break something open and play with discrete parts in isolation. But the more we learn, the more we are coming to realize that everything is deeply embedded in an infinitely complex system of inter-related processes wherein everything that happens is causally related in greater or lesser degree to everything else. The quaint notion that things have to have specific and isolatable causes has been evaporating for a long time now. K. Why questions might be unintelligable. You are missing the point. You may be correct about causality, but if you are then you cannot use a person cannot use a first cause argument to assert god's existence. One it is used, it is cherating intellectually to say oh, it applies to all, but god.
|
|
|
|