Yachtie
Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel It's been noted in a number of studies, here's a recent one with an abstract that's rather descriptive on the subject quote:
ORIGINAL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608001013 The present study examined whether IQ relates systematically to denomination and income within the framework of the g nexus, using representative data from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY97). Atheists score 1.95 IQ points higher than Agnostics, 3.82 points higher than Liberal persuasions, and 5.89 IQ points higher than Dogmatic persuasions. Denominations differ significantly in IQ and income. Religiosity declines between ages 12 to 17. It is suggested that IQ makes an individual likely to gravitate toward a denomination and level of achievement that best fit his or hers particular level of cognitive complexity. Ontogenetically speaking this means that contemporary denominations are rank ordered by largely hereditary variations in brain efficiency (i.e. IQ). In terms of evolution, modern Atheists are reacting rationally to cognitive and emotional challenges, whereas Liberals and, in particular Dogmatics, still rely on ancient, pre-rational, supernatural and wishful thinking. So you answer that atheists are of higher IQ, act rationally and then you proceed to avoid explaining the correlation you state exists which IS what I directly challenged. Since you brought up IQ, are you a moron? Your statement- Certainly not all christans are morons but you can't blame people for noticing the correlation. My challenge- What correlation would that be? Now, if one were to correlate IQ as to comprehension, whose IQ is higher? Yours or mine?
|