sunshinemiss -> RE: text speak (2/6/2012 11:06:32 AM)
|
ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake If you have so little respect for your reader that you will not to bother to write, why should your reader take the time you saved to try to figure out what it was that you were too lazy to say? What you call lack of respect others would call making the effort to at least create a dialogue, if imperfectly. You needn't agree for it to be true. Not everyone follows your rules, and those that do, I expect don't do so perfectly all the time. quote:
Sunshine miss I know folks here hate it (and I'm not a lover of it). But you know, we all did get used to touch tone phones, laptops, remote controls, dishwashers, automatic garage door openers, and the like. Remember George Jetson and all the things that were then scifi and are now de riguer? Text speak is on that continuum imo. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. My opinion is, text speak is a fad. It will die when kids get videophones. (Checks watch) As an aside, these have been around for years. Skype is also a fairly popular thing; so is youtube. And yet... text speak still seems to be growing. In the meantime, this is not Twitter, it's a bulletin board. You are not limited to a handful of characters. There is nothing forcing you to be rude. And yet you find it to be an acceptable choice within all that wordiness for you to be so. Notwithstanding the existence of touch tone phones, laptops, remote controls, dishwashers and automatic garage door openers. Bottom line, my high I.Q. does not give me the ability to read your mind. Well golly... this here stoopid person thought that text speak was an actual method of written communication. It would seem you are too lazy (to use your own term) to learn what is and is not common knowledge. Using "words" that are not words does not bring me down to your level. Shakespeare did it all the time, and yet he's not exactly considered a moron. Perhaps you are not aware of the number of words that join any living language. Heck, I remember when google was a number. It makes me discard your message. If that is what you are trying to do, keep it up. If you are instead hoping I will grit my teeth and slog through the muck you spatter on the page, stop. I'm not sure why you would address this to me specifically - being as I rarely do it, and don't particularly like it - as I clearly pointed out in the OP, but to each his own. If you are too lazy to learn the language as it evolves and choose instead to live in the stagnant past, I don't believe I would really care whether you read the "muck" that I "splatter on the page." Luckily, plenty of people pay for my muck. sunshine
|
|
|
|