Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: human conceit


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: human conceit Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: human conceit - 6/3/2006 5:45:57 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kedikat

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I think the problem is equating the concept of a supreme being with religion


Yes. And trying to find the devine shortcuts to it's being pleased with you. Somehow I think, following some arcane rituals, and or praying to a supreme being would not interest it. Being the best you can be in the everchanging universe it created might.  If it created this everchanging universe for us to enjoy and be challenged by, do you think it would be pleased to see us stuck in a ritual rut, bound up in old texts rules? That would be a very petty supreme being.

Edited to include. I in no way want the last line or two to be interpreted as a challenge to the one quoted. I agree with her statement. And elaborated on it with my opinions. I don't intend that she is stuck in ritual or such.


As  nonreligious person myself I have never understood them. But when I studied them from an academic view it became clear to me that such rituals serve powerful needs within human beings... therefore I do not think that the supreme being needs us to do these rituals, I think they serve the human being doing them at a societal level and at an individual level...

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: human conceit - 6/4/2006 2:31:04 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrTiger

You can totally ignore what I say and all me a bigot to suit your own purposes if you want, though you are totally wrong to do so I would also just like to point out that by making me out to be a bigot with no actual justification whatsoever means it is in fact you that are applying inaccurate labels to people and not me. I hold no negative view of anyone who follows any of the major world religions even though I do not like some of the deeply bigoted sentiments held within some of them.


Exactly - You did get the point.  (I think) Well done.
 
quote:

You say I am wrong?

 
 
In a way yes.  It isn't healthy to generalise and pigeon hole EVERYONE.  Your are not wrong for having your opinion and placing it on yourself - that is free will.  That is freedom of speech.  You are blessed that in the country you reside, you can voice your personal belief.  Many cannot.
Sometimes thats because of religious bias.  Sometimes it is because of science.  And sometimes politics.
But not at the expense of labeling everyone who dosn't fit your ideals with a non consenusal sticker.
 
Fine line baby, fine line.
 
(And on a side note, we can disagree as much as we would wish and talk our differences over, but I would suggest that unless you can have a calm and reasoned discussion without resulting to personal attacks of trying to belittle because we disagree(labels aside) - best avoid my posts and block them in the future  )
 
Peace and Rapture


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to MstrTiger)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: human conceit - 6/4/2006 2:37:36 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kedikat

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I think the problem is equating the concept of a supreme being with religion


Yes. And trying to find the devine shortcuts to it's being pleased with you. Somehow I think, following some arcane rituals, and or praying to a supreme being would not interest it. Being the best you can be in the everchanging universe it created might.  If it created this everchanging universe for us to enjoy and be challenged by, do you think it would be pleased to see us stuck in a ritual rut, bound up in old texts rules? That would be a very petty supreme being.

Edited to include. I in no way want the last line or two to be interpreted as a challenge to the one quoted. I agree with her statement. And elaborated on it with my opinions. I don't intend that she is stuck in ritual or such.


As  nonreligious person myself I have never understood them. But when I studied them from an academic view it became clear to me that such rituals serve powerful needs within human beings... therefore I do not think that the supreme being needs us to do these rituals, I think they serve the human being doing them at a societal level and at an individual level...

I love your statement and totally agree.  I think that occurs in anything, be it religion, or anything else.  Even in BDSM there are rituals and certain acts that allow the person - the individual - to get to that place that best suits them and gives a sense of belonging(why do people insist on calling it a lifestyle or a community if they are no concerned on belonging somewhere?).  (And it is also the cause of 'onetrue wayisms that can be found scattered throughout BDSM society) Be it third person speech or a certain way a submissive deals with the Master/Mistress returning home.  As a parent, I know that rituals and routine are vital for a child - it allows them to learn more about themselves and their abilities... it teaches and inspires.  It assists with independance and dependance and entwines the two 'opposites' beautifully.  It gives them stability.
 
Without rituals and routines, society, IMO would collapse.
 
Peace and Rapture


< Message edited by darkinshadows -- 6/4/2006 2:43:52 AM >


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: human conceit - 6/4/2006 3:12:05 AM   
Reflectivesoul


Posts: 1777
Joined: 4/25/2006
Status: offline
*curls up in a chair in the corner waaaay outta the way with a bowl of popcorn and a glass of ice water*
 
I like religious conversations.... or well debates on if there is "something " out there...
 
Just my 2 cents.... I dont know if there is anything out there but if there is I intend to complaint heartily if there is....

_____________________________

ooooo..I bet THATS gonna leave a mark!!!!

Equal opportunity pisser on-er ... heh..

Gimme some crayons, I want color and I want it now DAMNIT!


(in reply to MstrTiger)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: human conceit - 6/4/2006 5:48:02 PM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline
Religion is different from spirituality. Religion is guidelines and rules set down by the church. Spirituality is ones own communion with God as they understand Him or Her as the person chooses.

Belief in God has nothing to do with conceit and it is basically inflammatory to say so. What does it matter what a person believes? Does it suit some agenda to attack those that believe something that is different from your beliefs?

Stating that someone is "clearly wrong" about the existence of God has as much basis as people that claim there is no proof of God. This debate shouldn't dwindle down to name calling and generalizations... although it is very difficult to debate something so strongly felt on both sides.

I believe in God and I make no apologies for it, nor will I. I am not religious and I do not condemn others for what they choose to believe even though it conflicts with what I believe. I would suggest that others respect those that choose to believe in something rather than nothing.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: human conceit - 6/4/2006 6:03:17 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
I agree, it is just as conceited to ridicule people for believing in God or a religion as to insist that your religion has defined God and owns God. Anyone that does not respect other people's beliefs, whether they be Pat Robertson or an atheist is the same in my opinion.. it is arrogant. This is why I think only agnostic have any higher moral ground to preach from the place of "not knowing" because no one knows...lol. The only form of Christianity I have been interested in for the last 5 years if Gnosticism, and I am not a Gnostic either.

I get very frustrated with people that ridicule that which is different from themselves. It just shows a depth of intolerance for people in general. If someone's ideas are wrong-headed that will show through. I do not need everyone to believe as I do. Most Atheists I know are very moral people, all the more so because they behave themselves out of the desire to do so and not because of some religious guilt. I admire many Atheists I have known. But part of the reason I admired them is because they did not act like they were better than others that believed differently.

Anyone that thinks they know things no one has ever known is conceited and arrogant in my eyes... but that is me and I could be wrong

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: human conceit - 6/4/2006 6:20:01 PM   
mgdartist


Posts: 328
Joined: 5/13/2006
From: irving tx
Status: offline
being a preachers kid, i never dreamed i'd need to come here and give my explanation of god and religion. Actually i won't until asked. Perhaps first, reading this little (ok big-ass) metaphor on the realities of the situation, and of godliness, will also give all a taste of the longwinded pontificatory use of this forum pulpit ill be needing should anyone actually make the mistake of asking me to help them understand god, and why he put us here:

quote:

This morning there was a knock at my door. When I answered the door I found a well groomed, nicely dressed couple.

The man spoke first: "Hi! I'm John, and this is Mary."


Mary: "Hi! We're here to invite you to come kiss Hank's ass with us."

Me: "Pardon me?! What are you talking about? Who's Hank, and why would I want to kiss his ass?"

John: "If you kiss Hank's ass, he'll give you a million dollars; and if you don't, he'll kick the shit out of you."

Me: "What? Is this some sort of bizarre mob shake-down?"

John: "Hank is a billionaire philanthropist. Hank built this town. Hank owns this town. He can do what ever he wants and what he wants is to give you a million dollars, but he can't until you kiss his ass."

Me: "That doesn't make any sense. Why..."

Mary: "Who are you to question Hank's gift? Don't you want a million dollars? Isn't it worth a little kiss on the ass?"

Me: "Well maybe, if it's legit, but..."

John: "Then come kiss Hank's ass with us."

Me: "Do you kiss Hank's ass often?"

Mary: "Oh yes, all the time..."

Me: "And has he given you a million dollars?"

John: "Well no, you don't actually get the money until you leave town."

Me: "So why don't you just leave town now?"

Mary: "You can't leave until Hank tells you to, or you don't get the money, and he kicks the shit out of you."

Me: "Do you know anyone who kissed Hank's ass, left town, and got the million dollars?"

John: "My mother kissed Hank's ass for years. She left town last year, and I'm sure she got the money."

Me: "Haven't you talked to her since then?"

John: "Of course not, Hank doesn't allow it."

Me: "So what makes you think he'll actually give you the money if you've never talked to anyone who got the money?"

Mary: "Well, he gives you a little bit before you leave. Maybe you'll get a raise; maybe you'll win a small lotto; maybe you'll just find a twenty dollar bill on the street."

Me: "What's that got to do with Hank?"

John: "Hank has certain connections."

Me: "I'm sorry, but this sounds like some sort of bizarre con game."

John: "But it's a million dollars! Can you really take the chance? And remember, if you don't kiss Hank's ass he'll kick the shit of you."

Me: "Maybe if I could see Hank, talk to him, get the details straight from him..."

Mary: "No one sees Hank, no one talks to Hank."

Me: "Then how do you kiss his ass?"

John: "Sometimes we just blow him a kiss, and think of his ass. Other times we kiss Karl's ass, and he passes it on."

Me: "Who's Karl?"

Mary: "A friend of ours. He's the one who taught us all about kissing Hank's ass. All we had to do was take him out to dinner a few times."

Me: "And you just took his word for it when he said there was a Hank, that Hank wanted you to kiss his ass, and that Hank would reward you?"

John: "Oh no! Karl's got a letter Hank sent him years ago explaining the whole thing. Here's a copy; see for yourself."

John handed me a photocopy of a handwritten memo on "From the desk of Karl" letterhead. There were eleven items listed:

1.) Kiss Hank's ass and he'll give you a million dollars when you leave town.
2.) Use alcohol in moderation.
3.) Kick the shit out of people who aren't like you.
4.) Eat right.
5.) Hank dictated this list himself.
6.) The moon is made of green cheese.
7.) Everything Hank says is right.
8.) Wash your hands after going to the bathroom.
9.) Don't drink.
10.) Eat your wieners on buns, no condiments.
11.) Kiss Hank's ass or he'll kick the shit out of you.


Me: "This would appear to be written on Karl's letterhead."

Mary: "Hank didn't have any paper."

Me: "I have a hunch that if we checked we'd find this is Karl's handwriting."

John: "Of course, Hank dictated it."

Me: "I thought you said no one gets to see Hank?"

Mary: "Not now, but years ago he would talk to some people."

Me: "I thought you said he was a philanthropist. What sort of philanthropist kicks the shit out of people just because they're different?"

Mary: "It's what Hank wants, and Hank's always right."

Me: "How do you figure that?"

Mary: "Item 7 says Everything Hanks says is right.' That's good enough for me!"

Me: "Maybe your friend Karl just made the whole thing up."

John: "No way! Item 5 says 'Hank dictated this list himself.' Besides, item 2 says 'Use alcohol in moderation,' item 4 says 'Eat right,' and item 8 says 'Wash your hands after going to the bathroom.' Everyone knows those things are right, so the rest must be true, too."

Me: "But #9 says 'Don't Drink,' which doesn't quite go with #2. And #6 says 'The moon is made of green cheese,' which is just plain wrong."

John: "There's no contradiction between 9 and 2; 9 just clarifies 2. As to 6, you've never been to the moon, so you can't say for sure."

Me: "Scientists have pretty firmly established that the moon is made of rock..."

Mary: "But they don't know if the rock came from the Earth, or from outer space, so it could just as easily be green cheese."

Me: "I'm not really an expert, but I think the theory that the Moon came from the Earth has been discounted. Besides, not knowing where the rock came from doesn't make it cheese."

John: "Aha! You just admitted that scientists make mistakes, but we know Hank is always right!"

Me: "We do?"

Mary: "Of course we do, Item 5 says so."

Me: "You're saying Hank's always right because the list says so, the list is right because Hank dictated it, and we know that Hank dictated it because the list says so. That's circular logic, no different than saying 'Hank's right because he says he's right.'"

John: "Now you're getting it! It's so rewarding to see someone come around to Hank's way of thinking."

Me: "But...oh, never mind. What's the deal with wieners?"

Mary blushes.

John: "Wieners, in buns, no condiments. It's Hank's way. Anything else is wrong."

Me: "What if I don't have a bun?"

John: "No bun, no wiener. A wiener without a bun is wrong."

Me: "No relish? No Mustard?"

Mary looks positively stricken.

John shouts: "There's no need for such language! Condiments of any kind are wrong!"

Me: "So a big pile of sauerkraut with some wieners chopped up in it would be out of the question?"

Mary (sticking her fingers in her ears): "I am not listening to this. La la la, la la, la la la."

John: "That's disgusting. Only some sort of evil deviant would eat that..."

Me: "It's good! I eat it all the time."

Mary faints.

John (catching her): "Well, if I'd known you were one of those, I wouldn't have wasted my time. When Hank kicks the shit out of you, I'll be there, counting my money and laughing. I'll kiss Hank's ass for you, you bunless cut-wienered kraut-eater." With this, John dragged Mary to their waiting car, and sped off.

writer: unknown

in respect however, to our original poster, the wisest man who ever lived (biblically) did in fact say of life:
"...it is all vanity, and vexation of spirit"
King Solomon

mgd


< Message edited by mgdartist -- 6/4/2006 6:29:04 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 67
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: human conceit Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063