RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


slvemike4u -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/19/2012 7:29:38 PM)

I never made any disparaging remark where Penn was concerned,actually he is one of the few whose opinion I would bother to listen to.....and the reason is simple,he takes the time to inform himself on the issues he speaks out about.
Doesn't mean I would agree with him on everything,but I will listen to his point of view.
Some of the other "outspoken celebrities...not so much.
Cause they are stupid.....lol




thompsonx -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/20/2012 3:57:32 PM)

quote:

Spain had no decent claim on louisiana.

Treaty of san ildefonso.

The Islands you claim were appropriated by the US military were UNINHABITED. Who are they pointing a fucking gun at?

If you are the u.s. navy you are the guns and whoever may have previously held claim to those islands acquiessed.

Gadsden purchase at the point of a gun? Why did they fucking BUY it instead of taking it. Unless you can back it up, I'm calling bullshit.

The u.s. also "bought" california,arizona,new mexico,nevada,colorado,texas and parts of several other states.
If someone has a .45 in your ear you will sell what ever he ask for and accept what ever they are paying.


No land was taken during the revolution west of the Mississippi.

The Brits had some claims on the red river basin and needed money to fund their previous war against france.

The history books say otherwise. The 1818 treaty settled boundries set out of ignorance. The settlement resolves boundries from the revolutionary war.

Same reason France sold us Louisiana to fund their war against England.

Their inability to defend it and the fact that they were selling shit that did not belong to them made it a totally sweet deal.





LookieNoNookie -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/20/2012 5:24:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

I never really rated him much as an actor but he certainly has less respect from me now

Obviously it would help if he understood a little about the real postion before spouting his mouth off.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2100858/Sean-Penns-idiot-fool-Falklands-hero-Simon-Weston-hits-back.html



He's an actor, not a whole lot unlike your or my profession.

Something he does (seemingly) well.

He's not a puppet, any more than you or I are.

Just because he imagines doesn't mean he can't see.

I don't believe half the shit he does, and I think he's a phenomenal actor but, could he run a business?

Doubtful.

Does he have valid points?

Do you?

I do.

I suspect you do as well.

(And I don't doubt your passion any more than I doubt his).




SternSkipper -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/20/2012 6:38:19 PM)

quote:

I don't believe half the shit he does, and I think he's a phenomenal actor but, could he run a business?


I just want to know who wrote the international law that a person who enjoys celebrity is committing a crime or something.

He's a guy who's using his wealth and his influence to do things he feels are important.

Shit, if I had wealth and influence, Congress would already have taken delivery on their new WOOPIE CUSHION FURNITURE.





thompsonx -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 9:37:08 AM)

quote:

I don't believe half the shit he does, and I think he's a phenomenal actor but, could he run a business?


If financial success is a measure of how well one runs their business then by that measure he runs his business quite well.




Hillwilliam -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 10:55:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Spain had no decent claim on louisiana.

Treaty of san ildefonso.

The Islands you claim were appropriated by the US military were UNINHABITED. Who are they pointing a fucking gun at?

If you are the u.s. navy you are the guns and whoever may have previously held claim to those islands acquiessed.

Gadsden purchase at the point of a gun? Why did they fucking BUY it instead of taking it. Unless you can back it up, I'm calling bullshit.

The u.s. also "bought" california,arizona,new mexico,nevada,colorado,texas and parts of several other states.
If someone has a .45 in your ear you will sell what ever he ask for and accept what ever they are paying.


No land was taken during the revolution west of the Mississippi.

The Brits had some claims on the red river basin and needed money to fund their previous war against france.

The history books say otherwise. The 1818 treaty settled boundries set out of ignorance. The settlement resolves boundries from the revolutionary war.

Same reason France sold us Louisiana to fund their war against England.

Their inability to defend it and the fact that they were selling shit that did not belong to them made it a totally sweet deal.



Seeing as how the treaty of San Ildefonso was in 1800 and Spain quitclaimed it's rights to Louisiana to France and THEN France sold it to the US, We didn't hold a gun to their heads. For the reason of this discussion the fact that the US amicably bought from France makes it a legit purchase by us.

The US navy claimed those uninhabited islands. Do you have any evidence that anyone else knew they existed, much less claimed them. Your 'force argument' has no veracity if noone else knew that the land in question even existed.

You say the US also 'bought' other things at gunpoint. yes, they did. You asked in an earlier post to show that the US had legitimately come by any land besides the purchase of Alaska and I showed several.

I answered your question and you forgot you asked it.[:D]




thompsonx -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 11:24:21 AM)

quote:

Seeing as how the treaty of San Ildefonso was in 1800 and Spain quitclaimed it's rights to Louisiana to France and THEN France sold it to the US, We didn't hold a gun to their heads. For the reason of this discussion the fact that the US amicably bought from France makes it a legit purchase by us.

Actually there are three treaties of san ildefonso. They were signed while the king of spain and the royal family were the "guests" of napoleon. The treaties, if you were to read them, indicate that spain still holds title to louisiana but that france had a protectorate. This is why the spanish had to send an emmisary to the signing of the sale documents. Jefferson knowingly bought stolen property from the man who held the lawful owner and his family prisoner.

The US navy claimed those uninhabited islands. Do you have any evidence that anyone else knew they existed, much less claimed them.


Were you to acquaint yourself with the history of oceana you would know.

Your 'force argument' has no veracity if noone else knew that the land in question even existed.

Oceana was well populated and the islands charted. That these people had no voice with the navies of the world does not change anything.

You say the US also 'bought' other things at gunpoint. yes, they did. You asked in an earlier post to show that the US had legitimately come by any land besides the purchase of Alaska and I showed several.


No I asked:



quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
With the exception of alaska which part of the u.s. did we acquire without the force of arms or the threat there of?


Your correct answer was the virgin islands.
The point was and is that the overwhelming majority of the u.s. was acquired by force of arms or the threat there of.







Hillwilliam -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 11:56:00 AM)

I'll agree with your statement that most of the US was acquired under force of arms but here is your original question.

"With the exception of alaska which part of the u.s. did we acquire without the force of arms or the threat there of? "

Yes, I was referring to the third treaty of Ildefonso. My point of Louisiana is WE didn't threaten anyone. they wanted to sell and we wanted to buy. What France did to obtain the treaty a few years beforehand is not relevant to your question.

As for the islands we acquired in the pacific, you might not have noticed the word "uninhabited".




Edwynn -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 11:58:53 AM)


quote:


The point was and is that the overwhelming majority of the u.s. was acquired by force of arms or the threat there of.




As was nearly every square inch of existing land on the planet at one time or another.

And you have every much right as Sean Penn to dispute me on that. And vice versa.







fucktoyprincess -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 12:21:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

Shit, if I had wealth and influence, Congress would already have taken delivery on their new WOOPIE CUSHION FURNITURE.


I'm with you on this - i.e., that if any of us had wealth and influence we are free to use it how we choose, to support our own causes and interests. It's the way the world works. And one just hopes that at least some of the wealthy care enough about others to add causes to their list that actually help others.

But, what in heaven's name, is WOOPIE CUSHION FURNITURE?




Moonhead -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 12:29:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper
Shit, if I had wealth and influence, Congress would already have taken delivery on their new WOOPIE CUSHION FURNITURE.

I'd go for concealed spikes myself.
Wired up to a car battery...




thompsonx -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 4:08:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I'll agree with your statement that most of the US was acquired under force of arms but here is your original question.

"With the exception of alaska which part of the u.s. did we acquire without the force of arms or the threat there of? "

Yes, I was referring to the third treaty of Ildefonso. My point of Louisiana is WE didn't threaten anyone. they wanted to sell and we wanted to buy. What France did to obtain the treaty a few years beforehand is not relevant to your question.


They did not want to sell it. Jefferson put together the voyage of discovery, which was a military expedition. He then approached napoleon about navigation access to new orleans. Napoleon knew he was in no position to repel the voyage of discovery so he decided to sell his stolen property to jefferson and come back later and reposses it when he was done england.
The voyage of discovery was armed with the most advanced weapon of the time...a repeating air rifle that would shoot more than 20 .46 cal bullets before recharging.
The spanish did mount an expedition to intercept lewis and clark. Were it not for sakajawea they would have been intercepted by a much larger military force.


As for the islands we acquired in the pacific, you might not have noticed the word "uninhabited".

How long were the falklands "uninhabited" by anything but a brass plaque? The natives of oceana did not have brass plaques to mark their turf.






LookieNoNookie -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 6:20:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

I don't believe half the shit he does, and I think he's a phenomenal actor but, could he run a business?


I just want to know who wrote the international law that a person who enjoys celebrity is committing a crime or something.

He's a guy who's using his wealth and his influence to do things he feels are important.

Shit, if I had wealth and influence, Congress would already have taken delivery on their new WOOPIE CUSHION FURNITURE.




Well said.




SternSkipper -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 9:10:52 PM)

quote:

But, what in heaven's name, is WOOPIE CUSHION FURNITURE?


If I were wealthy enough it would already exist.... But picture a nice Thomasville desk chair with red leather padded armrests and a b=nice cushy red leather seat ... perhaps a nice eagle claw foot on each leg. You sit down on it and the longest most excruciatingly wet sounding fart noise is emitted.
   Trust me it would be humbling every time a session of congress was called to order.





SternSkipper -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 9:12:11 PM)

quote:


Well said.


Thanks .... Ummmmm Can I taser your rabbit?




SternSkipper -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/21/2012 9:13:24 PM)

quote:


I'd go for concealed spikes myself.
Wired up to a car battery...


What you mean in the event that you got to sit in em.... Easy on the plainslut stuff moon[:D]




Moonhead -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/22/2012 3:44:29 AM)

I was thinking more of for politicians than for me.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/22/2012 1:25:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

But, what in heaven's name, is WOOPIE CUSHION FURNITURE?


If I were wealthy enough it would already exist.... But picture a nice Thomasville desk chair with red leather padded armrests and a b=nice cushy red leather seat ... perhaps a nice eagle claw foot on each leg. You sit down on it and the longest most excruciatingly wet sounding fart noise is emitted.
   Trust me it would be humbling every time a session of congress was called to order.



Yes, I guess that would keep them in their place....




Hillwilliam -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/22/2012 1:41:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I'll agree with your statement that most of the US was acquired under force of arms but here is your original question.

"With the exception of alaska which part of the u.s. did we acquire without the force of arms or the threat there of? "

Yes, I was referring to the third treaty of Ildefonso. My point of Louisiana is WE didn't threaten anyone. they wanted to sell and we wanted to buy. What France did to obtain the treaty a few years beforehand is not relevant to your question.


They did not want to sell it. Jefferson put together the voyage of discovery, which was a military expedition. He then approached napoleon about navigation access to new orleans. Napoleon knew he was in no position to repel the voyage of discovery so he decided to sell his stolen property to jefferson and come back later and reposses it when he was done england.
The voyage of discovery was armed with the most advanced weapon of the time...a repeating air rifle that would shoot more than 20 .46 cal bullets before recharging.
The spanish did mount an expedition to intercept lewis and clark. Were it not for sakajawea they would have been intercepted by a much larger military force.


As for the islands we acquired in the pacific, you might not have noticed the word "uninhabited".

How long were the falklands "uninhabited" by anything but a brass plaque? The natives of oceana did not have brass plaques to mark their turf.




Lewis and clark had that rifle which would shoot 40 projectiles. Bastard took 1500 pumps.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1210680_Lewis_andamp__Clark_had_an_Air_Rifle__.html

I'm saying that a Spanish expedition to stop L & C AFTER the property had been bought from France would have amounted to an act of war against us. We already had it and they were trying to strongarm us, not the other way around.

We aren't talking about the Falklands.
Natives of oceania tended to stay where there was a fresh water source. For your claim that we claimed islands at gunpoint, you will need to show a shred of evidence they were inhabited. Many islands in oceania are not habitable due to the lack of sufficient plant life or water sources.

Again, you have a lot of 'might haves' but no good proof.




thompsonx -> RE: When did Sean Penn become a politician??? (2/22/2012 3:00:32 PM)

quote:

Lewis and clark had that rifle which would shoot 40 projectiles. Bastard took 1500 pumps.

The journals of the voyage of discovery detail an interesting meeting with some souix who had come to administer a can of whuppass on lewis&co. After the demo they decided that perhaps a sight seeing trip of the countryside might be a better choice.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1210680_Lewis_andamp__Clark_had_an_Air_Rifle__.html

I'm saying that a Spanish expedition to stop L & C AFTER the property had been bought from France would have amounted to an act of war against us. We already had it and they were trying to strongarm us, not the other way around.

Remember the treaty of san ildefonso was secret. Neither jefferson nor the spanish military sent to intercept the voyage of discovery were aware of it.

We aren't talking about the Falklands.

My point was that the britts "abandoned" the falklands but left a plaque to show their soverignity...the oceanians had no such material or concept of soverignity.

Natives of oceania tended to stay where there was a fresh water source.

It is quite well established fact that folks from tahiti went regularly to and from hawaii. That they might make stopovers at islands with no water but other resources that would be necessary for the voyage would be a reasonable assumption.

For your claim that we claimed islands at gunpoint, you will need to show a shred of evidence they were inhabited.

That they were claimed by the u.s. navy an not citizen bill smith makes the point that the military siezed the islands. That no one was living there is proof of nothing. How much of alaska was occupied???yet we paid for the whole thing.

Many islands in oceania are not habitable due to the lack of sufficient plant life or water sources.

We are not talking about those islands are we?

Again, you have a lot of 'might haves' but no good proof.

So far the virgin islands are your only correct answer. I might add that this particular question has been asked many times before and so far you are the only one to come up with a correct answer.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125