Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
To the OP, I would define the term in counterpoint to Peon. The types of feminism that are about equality and freedom do not merit the term. To quote one of the main feminist organizations here, however: "Don't be absurd. Feminism isn't about freedom. You can't just do what you like. It has to be in line with the overall doctrine." I would apply the term to radical feminists that would impose their doctrine on women, taking on the role of oppressor to "correct" or "protect" these "poor, weak sisters of ours that haven't our strength and insight". That's likely not the only case I would use the term, but I would like to think I reserve it for brands of feminism that are both too radical for the bulk of women and indefensible from where I stand. I would also note that I've used it, and the term 'misandry', in posting here, and that it doesn't appear to have driven e.g. LadyHibiscus to ignoring me on any regular basis, despite the assertion above. As such, I suspect it's a term for which there is a time and place, but that the vast majority are consistently using it as an emote that serves little other purpose than to mark their stance so one can sort them more quickly as she suggested. Much like the term 'slut'. Health, al-Aswad. P.S.: I have a different reply, but without editing it requires more seasoning than is reasonable to expect on a thread such as this. If anyone wants it, it's in my PIM, so I can PM a copy.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|