quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

I think this might actually be a better idea, for several reasons.
1. It puts onus on the person who, if a scoffow, would otherwise avoid all responsibility.
2. It is much easier for a man to repeat the action of getting a woman pregnant who cannot with his help financially support the child. Also, a single man could cause several women to need abortions, while other men never cause that need.
3. Lets face it, the procedure is cheaper and easier.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

I think this might actually be a better idea, for several reasons.
1. It puts onus on the person who, if a scoffow, would otherwise avoid all responsibility.
2. It is much easier for a man to repeat the action of getting a woman pregnant who cannot with his help financially support the child. Also, a single man could cause several women to need abortions, while other men never cause that need.
3. Lets face it, the procedure is cheaper and easier.

This seems a serious impediment to the whole Pamela Anderson argument I made some days back....and frankly....I feel we're going backwards on this issue.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

I think this might actually be a better idea, for several reasons.
1. It puts onus on the person who, if a scoffow, would otherwise avoid all responsibility.
2. It is much easier for a man to repeat the action of getting a woman pregnant who cannot with his help financially support the child. Also, a single man could cause several women to need abortions, while other men never cause that need.
3. Lets face it, the procedure is cheaper and easier.

This seems a serious impediment to the whole Pamela Anderson argument I made some days back....and frankly....I feel we're going backwards on this issue.

I thought we'd agreed I had a better idea. Your idea, get a small group of women of a particular appearance, and you have sex with them.
My idea, take a similar group of women, use genetic engineering to allow them to breed with eachother, and create 3 billion more of them!
Come on Lookie, keep up!

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

I think this might actually be a better idea, for several reasons.
1. It puts onus on the person who, if a scoffow, would otherwise avoid all responsibility.
2. It is much easier for a man to repeat the action of getting a woman pregnant who cannot with his help financially support the child. Also, a single man could cause several women to need abortions, while other men never cause that need.
3. Lets face it, the procedure is cheaper and easier.

quote:

ORIGINAL: wolf223


now I thought " I promise I wont cum inside you" was around long before the pill was.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

I think this might actually be a better idea, for several reasons.
1. It puts onus on the person who, if a scoffow, would otherwise avoid all responsibility.
2. It is much easier for a man to repeat the action of getting a woman pregnant who cannot with his help financially support the child. Also, a single man could cause several women to need abortions, while other men never cause that need.
3. Lets face it, the procedure is cheaper and easier.

they should sterilize anyone who suggests that others should be sterilized.