JeffBC -> RE: Is she a natural submissive? (3/1/2012 9:45:09 AM)
|
Aside from all the excellent commentary already given, I'll make a few observations. a) What is a "natural" sub? I used to use this phrase but then I finally realized that it's a pretty safe bet that whatever people do it is natural to them. Put differently, what exactly is an un-natural sub? That being said, I'll go ahead and make a wild guess at what you mean. I'm guessing you mean a woman who submits by default out in the world at large. Some might call such a person meek, deferential, or a doormat depending on their viewpoint. The counter-point I use in my head is the "I submit only to one" crowd who are otherwise "strong" and "assertive" (both questionable terms). Assuming that's what you meant, I'm married to such a woman and find the rest of your reasoning implausible. For starters b) If she is a "natural sub" (I call it social sub or "sub by default") then this has nothing to do with you Think about it. You're talking about a person who just "naturally" submits... TO EVERYONE. In that vein, you're nothing special... just another "anyone". In that same way Carol's submitting to me says little about my "dominance". At most it says she loves me, respects me, and trusts me enough to just let her "natural" behavior express unfettered by safety concerns. c) If she's a "natural sub", then her responses are not going to be conditioned by BDSM-isms. The very last thing Carol would EVER do is throw a bunch of extraneous "Sir's into a conversation. In general her big drive is to make other people feel comfortable so she'd be sticking to whatever society scripts were appropriate to any given situation. She would not be taking risks with a bunch of BDSM-language to a probably not BDSM person. In other words, even if she IS a "natural sub" then all your seeing is polite responses in a normal social context. Your interpretation of "Sir" is probably incorrect. It doesn't mean she respects you or your dominance. It means she's being polite and respecting social norms and not wanting to rock your boat. could I (if Pushed her) a bit own/take her? see all the other excellent answers. You really know nothing about the woman. In addition, there are always the ephemeral "chemistry" questions. There's no way to know until you try. How do I know if she is or not, even if she dosen't understand herself. Well, when I'm looking at someone I think is like this what I do is get them into some situation that is not really constrained... a casual social situation. Then I look to see whether they naturally adopt a follower position. If I offer her a seat does she take the one offered or another one? Who steers the conversation? I do my best to add up a zillion little data points... no one of which is conclusive. But yeah, if she generally lets me lead in the tiny little under-the-radar stuff then I'm going to call her a social sub. That still says NOTHING about whether she'd submit to me in anything more significant. There are a LOT of variables to human relationships. I need to find out if has a boyfriend. Hell would if even matter if she did because maybe he isn't giving her what she truely disires/needs. ROFLCOPTER. Step away from the keyboard and back into reality. Yes, it matters if she has a boyfriend. If nothing else, it ought to matter to you who is, presumably, a man of honor seeing as all BDSM doms are men of honor, right?
|
|
|
|