Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women should be allowed access to contraception and reprod


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women should be allowed access to contraception and reprod Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women sho... - 3/7/2012 2:21:04 AM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

His history "is a little bit muddy"...really,that's all you got.
Come on tazzy theres a whole lot more muddy than just his history.
Have you gone soft on me ?


Mike, baby, you know I got more. But I feel its wasted on an unarmed individual.

Personally, I feel I've been showing admirable restraint. It's unnatural. Likely comes from deconstructing right-wing horseshit on FL. Identifying Rhetorical Fallacies and such. Which is something I think you'd be good at, once you've learned about them.


_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women sho... - 3/7/2012 2:28:44 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
If you actually took the post in question at face value, which other responses (or lack therefrom, from an otherwise historically opportunistic  audience) indicate that most did not, and your latest response indicates that you actually did ...

Then again I say; sorry you missed it.



(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women sho... - 3/7/2012 3:17:40 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


If you actually took the post in question at face value, which other responses (or lack therefrom, from an otherwise historically opportunistic  audience) indicate that most did not, and your latest response indicates that you actually did ...

Then again I say; sorry you missed it.




I don't know what you are sorry about. You are assigning motivations and making assumptions about and regarding Ms. Fluke, hence what you offer is simply your own opinion. I get your opinion. I have a different opinion. Your contention seems to be that what she did is sneaky and underhanded. I disagree. I think that the fact that you even know about such things comes about from her own disclosures on the subject which rather puts to bed the notion that she was sneaky or underhanded. She was forth coming and honest about her motivations. It's not like she pulled a Weiner or something.

She wants to affect change. If she succeeds, kudo's to her for the effort. If she doesn't, kudos to her for trying. I didn't actually read the transcript of her testimoney because I watched it live but she seemed to be matter of fact and spoke about birth control for both prevention of reproduction and for medical reasons due to endometriosis etc. Endometriosis, regulating cycles are reason enough that the meds should be free. If we are talking cost, birth control is much more cost effective than either abortions or actually giving birth and raising a child to majority and birth control pills are an invaluable and oftentimes only medical resource that is cost effective to treat some of the ailments I've mentioned.

The whole congressional session was a mock session in any event. I don't believe the young lady should have been barred from the original session in Congress. If they had let her speak, the only ones who would even known who she is would be people like me who have no life so watch that sort of thing on CSPAN.

So, again.. I 'got' your opinion. I just disagree with your assessment. Sorry you don't, won't or can't 'get' that.

_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women sho... - 3/7/2012 5:59:04 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
You 'got' nothing. You missed by a mile. It was not my opinion that she was actually sneaky and underhanded. The intention was quite the opposite. The tone of the post was obvious to most, just not to yourself. It was blazing sarcasm, for those who took up on the intention, which you did not. The last sentence having begun with "the no-joking fact is ... " would have been the last ditch tip-off for sentient beings. Reading any single one of my (many) other posts on the matter would have been an indicator also.

That's what others got that you didn't. I cannot state it more plainly, and will not take further trouble for such a dolt.

Have fun with yourself.


< Message edited by Edwynn -- 3/7/2012 6:29:22 AM >

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women sho... - 3/7/2012 11:41:54 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


That's what others got that you didn't. I cannot state it more plainly, and will not take further trouble for such a dolt.





I don't believe I've ever read you before (at least not in that dress) and you aren't contributing anything of worth at this point. I don't think resorting to name calling is appropriate for adults and I'm not on here to converse with children.






_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women sho... - 3/8/2012 6:18:10 AM   
SoftBonds


Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


You 'got' nothing. You missed by a mile. It was not my opinion that she was actually sneaky and underhanded. The intention was quite the opposite. The tone of the post was obvious to most, just not to yourself. It was blazing sarcasm, for those who took up on the intention, which you did not. The last sentence having begun with "the no-joking fact is ... " would have been the last ditch tip-off for sentient beings. Reading any single one of my (many) other posts on the matter would have been an indicator also.

That's what others got that you didn't. I cannot state it more plainly, and will not take further trouble for such a dolt.

Have fun with yourself.



You can't call a fellow poster names, it is in the TOS. I expect this response to you to be pulled for quoting your insult.
(btw, I also expect your post to be pulled)

_____________________________

Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)

The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 86
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Transcript: Sandra Fluke testifies on why women should be allowed access to contraception and reprod Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063