Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hypocrisy and the Law


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hypocrisy and the Law Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/12/2012 9:16:01 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani
Laws should be simplified and left up to the judge to judge.


?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/12/2012 10:08:46 AM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline
Kinda had that comin I guess.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/12/2012 12:16:03 PM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
You have not studied these concepts. You have no idea what you are talking about. What you wrote is drivel. Rule of force? Since when has it been otherwise. I am talking about its justification.

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/12/2012 6:34:48 PM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
Atheism appears to come in two varieties. Those who can cope with moral contradiction and those who cannot.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/12/2012 6:41:14 PM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

Atheism appears to come in two varieties. Those who can cope with moral contradiction and those who cannot.


Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/12/2012 7:58:25 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: GrandPoobah
To compare these two, look at the the treatment of Bernie Madoff and some average, run-of-the-mill murderer. Bernie got "life" but lives in one of those minimum security country-club prisons, while the other guy lives in a hole. Bernie destroyed the lives of hundreds of folks, effectively "killing them" even if they're still alive. The other guy killed just one person.

I find it very odd that people go all beserk about Madoff when at the same time they hate the 1% so dam much but its the 1% that Madoff ripped off.. It was people's own greed that did them in.. and it seems that he has hero status in jail.. lol

"In prison he doesn’t have to hide his lack of conscience. In fact, he’s a hero for it."
"From MCC, Madoff explained the trap he was in. “People just kept throwing money at me,” Madoff related to a prison consultant who advised him on how to endure prison life. “Some guy wanted to invest, and if I said no, the guy said, ‘What, I’m not good enough?’ ” One day, Shannon Hay, a drug dealer who lived in the same unit in Butner as Madoff, asked about his crimes. “He told me his side. He took money off of people who were rich and greedy and wanted more,” "
"Quickly, the flow came to Madoff. From the moment he alighted, he had “groupies,” according to several inmates. Prisoners trailed him as he took his exercise around the track. (Persico had also attracted a throng when he arrived, but was disgusted and quickly put an end to it.) “They buttered him up,” one former inmate told me. “Everybody was trying to kiss his ass,” says Shawn Evans, who spent 28 months in Butner. They even clamored for his autograph. "

http://nymag.com/news/crimelaw/66468/

http://washingtonindependent.com/22504/the-sob-stories-of-madoffs-wealthy-victims

The hypocrisy is that the only difference between Madoff and wall street where fraud seems a culture, is that wall street got a bailout. Corporate crime is a civil crime or financial crime and almost never results in any criminal charges.

As for criminal corporate crime...there is almost none. The corporation being a legal abstract, is designed for private profit without private liability.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 6:47:07 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

You have not studied these concepts. You have no idea what you are talking about. What you wrote is drivel. Rule of force? Since when has it been otherwise. I am talking about its justification.

That's what we're both talking about home schooler.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 7:00:17 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

I remember Brennus... saying Vae Victis when he sacked Rome in 450 BC.
But there is another thing he said, wich all lawyers can attest to these days.
" Because you romans wrote down the law, there is always a way I can circumvent your law. Our law is unwritten, you cannot outrun our law.''

Just a technicality.
Everybody in Holland is supposed to know the law. But that is impossible. Laws should be simplified and left up to the judge to judge.
Any courtcase that misfired on a technicality is an abomination, for lack of a better word.

Our laws are based on the concept that any law that treats the innocent as if they were guilty is an abomination, the price of that is the requirement for due diligence in the prosecution of the law, which in turn generates those "technicalities" when those requirements are not observed.

And unwritten law is nothing but loopholes, goes back to the conundrum of moral ambiguity as the price of consciousness.

I hear the usual, you don't want to think no more, and a noetic species trying to act anoetically rapidly becomes De Sades war of all against all - pretty much where we've gotten ourselves now, again, and you both should know that in any contest between god and Mammon, Mammon always has the advantage. So in the end, it usually amounts to about the same thing, that's an established historical pattern.

Mammon, you see, has a certain substance that god lacks - god looks good from a distance, Mammon looks a lot better up close.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 7:26:15 AM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

I remember Brennus... saying Vae Victis when he sacked Rome in 450 BC.
But there is another thing he said, wich all lawyers can attest to these days.
" Because you romans wrote down the law, there is always a way I can circumvent your law. Our law is unwritten, you cannot outrun our law.''

Just a technicality.
Everybody in Holland is supposed to know the law. But that is impossible. Laws should be simplified and left up to the judge to judge.
Any courtcase that misfired on a technicality is an abomination, for lack of a better word.

Our laws are based on the concept that any law that treats the innocent as if they were guilty is an abomination, the price of that is the requirement for due diligence in the prosecution of the law, which in turn generates those "technicalities" when those requirements are not observed.

And unwritten law is nothing but loopholes, goes back to the conundrum of moral ambiguity as the price of consciousness.

I hear the usual, you don't want to think no more, and a noetic species trying to act anoetically rapidly becomes De Sades war of all against all - pretty much where we've gotten ourselves now, again, and you both should know that in any contest between god and Mammon, Mammon always has the advantage. So in the end, it usually amounts to about the same thing, that's an established historical pattern.

Mammon, you see, has a certain substance that god lacks - god looks good from a distance, Mammon looks a lot better up close.

You're right unwritten law can be one big loophole. It's just a wise lesson I think we should consider, in writing down the law. Like one law could suffice that technical loopholes are prohibited. That is different from loopholes based on interpretation of the law.
Its the same with taxes. I prefer to go back to the most basic sense and from there move on again.

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 7:52:37 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
Nope, the Anglo-Saxon legal system evolved the way it has because no Two crimes are exactly a alike - what is a crime in one instance is not a crime in another - i.e., murder, what is it, how do you define it?

"Thou shalt not kill" is all well and and good in theory, but in praxis, there are myriad instances and circumstances - heroism in war is murder in peace.

The only way to determine justly what has occurred and whether it's a crime or not, is to establish a legal fiction, and determine if a given case satisfies the definition of that fiction - i.e., "white collar crime" - is it a crime? Or corporate crime - like Mr. Rodgers alluded to above, how can one commit a crime against an abstract entity?

Murder is probably the least ambiguous example, but we we still apply myriad gradations w/regard to action and intent in order to satisfy the legal fiction of what is "murder" - i.e, we have First, Second and Third degree murder, manslaughter, negligent homicide, justifiable homicide, etc., etc. and rule of law applies it to everyone equally.

Without all those gradations, necessary for the rule of law, it just becomes a binary call, yea or nay, and it all depends on who's doing the judging - the law rapidly becomes a popularity contest, a justification of wealth and power, and unjust law really ain't no law at all.

< Message edited by xssve -- 3/13/2012 7:55:49 AM >


_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 7:59:49 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
i.e., if you're starting with law without first defining justice, you're in arbitrary territory from the start, you're putting the cart before the horse.

That is, if you believe that to be called "the law", it must be just - otherwise, what you have is simply arbitrary coercion and violence - crime, essentially.

< Message edited by xssve -- 3/13/2012 8:00:20 AM >


_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 8:03:56 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
Police and criminals are doing exactly the same things: kicking in doors and beating peoples heads in, taking their shit - the only difference is that the police are theoretically charged with doing it in manner consistent with a consensus of what is and is not just.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 8:07:05 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
It ain't perfect, but it rolls, and it's taken a while and a lot of hard lessons to get here - BM's just trying to reinvent the flat tire.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 8:09:17 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

I remember Brennus... saying Vae Victis when he sacked Rome in 450 BC.
But there is another thing he said, wich all lawyers can attest to these days.
" Because you romans wrote down the law, there is always a way I can circumvent your law. Our law is unwritten, you cannot outrun our law.''

Just a technicality.
Everybody in Holland is supposed to know the law. But that is impossible. Laws should be simplified and left up to the judge to judge.
Any courtcase that misfired on a technicality is an abomination, for lack of a better word.



I would completely disagree.

It should be left strictly up to the jury, and go back to having court masters keeping the judge in a strictly administrative capacity.

Its pretty tough to corrupt everyone. If they wont and the courts are such a profit center now days they never will do that then appeals should be free.

Most of the bullshit law created by the legislature would be abolished if EVERYTHING including parking tickets were to be adjudicated by jury court in not not only criminal but civil cases as well.

The government literally has a blank check through the court and legislative systems and you can see through time literally the same cases argued repeatedly through out history.

The people might be tards but they have nothing little to gain by corrupt rulings, a corporation of judges on the other hand are raping this country.

I would estimate the patriot act along generated well into a trillion in revenue since its passing.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 8:12:40 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Police and criminals are doing exactly the same things: kicking in doors and beating peoples heads in, taking their shit - the only difference is that the police are theoretically charged with doing it in manner consistent with a consensus of what is and is not just.


in some states they can keep 80+ percent of the sale from goods confiscated.

they are sanctioned thugs, no different from a standing army.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 8:15:28 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Police and criminals are doing exactly the same things: kicking in doors and beating peoples heads in, taking their shit - the only difference is that the police are theoretically charged with doing it in manner consistent with a consensus of what is and is not just.


in some states they can keep 80+ percent of the sale from goods confiscated.

they are sanctioned thugs, no different from a standing army.

There ya go, the "war on drugs" is the model here - anytime the cons start banging the war drum, look out.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 8:22:08 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: GrandPoobah
To compare these two, look at the the treatment of Bernie Madoff and some average, run-of-the-mill murderer. Bernie got "life" but lives in one of those minimum security country-club prisons, while the other guy lives in a hole. Bernie destroyed the lives of hundreds of folks, effectively "killing them" even if they're still alive. The other guy killed just one person.

I find it very odd that people go all beserk about Madoff when at the same time they hate the 1% so dam much but its the 1% that Madoff ripped off.. It was people's own greed that did them in.. and it seems that he has hero status in jail.. lol

"In prison he doesn’t have to hide his lack of conscience. In fact, he’s a hero for it."
"From MCC, Madoff explained the trap he was in. “People just kept throwing money at me,” Madoff related to a prison consultant who advised him on how to endure prison life. “Some guy wanted to invest, and if I said no, the guy said, ‘What, I’m not good enough?’ ” One day, Shannon Hay, a drug dealer who lived in the same unit in Butner as Madoff, asked about his crimes. “He told me his side. He took money off of people who were rich and greedy and wanted more,” "
"Quickly, the flow came to Madoff. From the moment he alighted, he had “groupies,” according to several inmates. Prisoners trailed him as he took his exercise around the track. (Persico had also attracted a throng when he arrived, but was disgusted and quickly put an end to it.) “They buttered him up,” one former inmate told me. “Everybody was trying to kiss his ass,” says Shawn Evans, who spent 28 months in Butner. They even clamored for his autograph. "

http://nymag.com/news/crimelaw/66468/

http://washingtonindependent.com/22504/the-sob-stories-of-madoffs-wealthy-victims

The hypocrisy is that the only difference between Madoff and wall street where fraud seems a culture, is that wall street got a bailout. Corporate crime is a civil crime or financial crime and almost never results in any criminal charges.

As for criminal corporate crime...there is almost none. The corporation being a legal abstract, is designed for private profit without private liability.



corruption is always around money power and unequal opportunity and that lives in the civil side, which is precisely why we need mandatory absolute jury courts for everything.

How can we prevent corrupt courts or government when they can simply rico our asses?

Attorney Jailed Denied Rights for Exposing Judicial Corruption, Richard Fine California

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/13/2012 8:25:37 AM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline
Its good to disagree.
We dont have a jury in Holland and look at the jury system as more vunerable to corruption.
Plus a jury is often played with emotionally.
Not to say we dont have plenty examples of corrupt judges here.
Its hard to tell wich is more secure. I dont have a definite answer, except that lawbooks can be simplified IMO.

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/14/2012 4:24:58 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
Why is justification important? If I have to explain it, there is little point in explaining it.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Hypocrisy and the Law - 3/14/2012 6:57:33 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
Justification which requires no justification? Lol.

Hint: if you can't or won't explain why it is just, it's not a justification.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hypocrisy and the Law Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.102