DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
I only recently did some digging on this. While, usually, I am loathe to send our troops to too many places because I am sick of the empire building that we've been doing for the last 30-50 years, these don't sound like very good guys to me. Now, while war is hell (and I believe it always should be so that it is something we are wanting to avoid) and sometimes, certain "courtesies" may get over-looked on the battlefield, I highly doubt, from the descriptions I've read, that the LRA is truly a bunch of good Christians, fighting the good fight. That said, it invokes my desire that when we feel that we absolutely must engage in war, we should go in with a plan for unqualified victory. Go in, wipe out the enemy ... obliterate them or their ability to wage war, take your pick and get out so that the people of that country can go back to living their lives as they see fit. So, that begs the question: Why so few troops? Let's go in, git 'er done and get the hell out in time for Sunday dinner back home. Our military operations of the last twenty (if not thirty) years could be summed up as: "There's injustice somewhere! This is our chance to colonize another spot on the globe (big plus if there's oil under the ground, there)!" Of that, I do not approve. I understand that being the world's only remaining "super power" morally obligates us to helping in some squabbles but it doesn't obligate us to spread democracy to places that may not want it. Peace and comfort, Michael
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|