RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


xssve -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/17/2012 6:08:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

You have claimed atheism is somehow "bad" - you have yet to demonstrate this, which you would have to do if you are arguing that "something should be done about it".

There is no shortage of evidence however, that great evil has been done in the name of religion.


Your so-called evidence is evidence that great evil has been committed by humanity. Given that the vast bulk of humanity are close to being atheists, you may have to come to grips with the fact that the problem is atheism and not religion. Your so-called evidence also has other problems. Atheists in this forum for example prefer subjective truth over objective truth. This is not encouraging since I was assuming that professed atheists were atheists because they prefer objective truth. Dislike is not an objective criteria. In other words, the precepts of atheism have been taken on faith. I nonetheless suspect that it will be easier to convince professed atheists that God exists over so-called believers who do not believe since their faith is partly delusional. Furthermore, there is no reason to believe that the unfolding of time, i.e. history, occurs due to how man wanted things to unfold.

There is reason to believe that Christ will save some people whose faith is partly delusional. There is also reason to believe that Christ will save some professed atheists since they do not know what they do. If Christ is going to save some professed atheists, it could be construed that it is a duty for Christians to lay that foundation and accept professed atheists as beloved of God.


So your argument is, that if great evil is done in the name of religion, it because they're atheists? That's the standard cop out, although usually they say: "they ain't real Christians" if it turns out to be reprehensible and unpopular.

It's still religion, and the criticism stands - i.e., it's just another excuse for religious institutions to commit great evil and afterwards you can claim it wasn't religion, you haven't solved any goddamn thing, just tried to evade responsibility.

So now, not only do you do evil, you don't take responsibility for it either.

I suppose that's all ok according to your theory of hypocrisy, it's ok 'cause hey, everybody else does it!

Sophistry: definitely look that one up.




MrBukani -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/17/2012 7:01:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

In the name of religion doesnt mean religion did it.
You are proposing that most people are atheists because they believe in the wrong sort of religion.
Very dangerous road youre taking.

Oh I think it does - you saying Inter Caterae is not the product of religion? The inquisition?

Maybe I shudda said in the name of god doesnt mean god did it.




xssve -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/17/2012 8:10:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani


quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

In the name of religion doesnt mean religion did it.
You are proposing that most people are atheists because they believe in the wrong sort of religion.
Very dangerous road youre taking.

Oh I think it does - you saying Inter Caterae is not the product of religion? The inquisition?

Maybe I shudda said in the name of god doesnt mean god did it.

In order to claim god did it, or told you to do it, you have to produce god or evidence of his existence - as that appears unlikely, and even if you do it's hearsay unless you can get god to take the witness stand, we're left with religion by process of elimination.




GotSteel -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/17/2012 10:22:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
Given that the vast bulk of humanity are close to being atheists, you may have to come to grips with the fact that the problem is atheism and not religion.


[sm=rofl.gif]




[image]local://upfiles/566126/33EF489FCB544F16929726353CEB34D8.jpg[/image]




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 2:13:01 AM)

If faith is more than a profession made with the lips, then these figures mean nothing. These figures mean something only if faith is a mere profession made with the lips.

I kind of had respect for professed atheists. I thought they were intellectuals who sought objective truth, but what I find are people who want to believe something only because it is agreeable to them. It is better to have an inconvenient faith that is true, than one that is convenient and false. Falsehood takes you straight to perdition.

"Do I believe that Malthusian corrections are avoidable? I do ..." It troubled me to say it when I said it. I too may be infected. I too would like to believe that Malthusian corrections are avoidable. When we experience trauma, for example, we are motivated to make a choice between good and evil. The obvious and most agreeable response is to chose evil. The counter-intuitive response is to chose good. In order to chose good requires the presence of great goodness within you. Can we find God in the absence of trauma or despair? It is considerations such as these that must be resolved in order to know what can be obtained in truth. It may be that there is nothing man can do except place his faith in God.

For having tried I will have invariably pleased God. Though God loves everyone, He was all along only interested in me. God likes me. Does He like you?




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 4:04:41 AM)

Atheism regards moral action as a conflict of interest. It is through moral action that we find God. I did ask God to show me what was true and what was false. In order not to lead others astray I must know the truth. Thanks be to God.

What I wrote on page 9 post 177 makes for a pleasant fantasy, but is it accurate? The manner in which I process information is not yet free of error. I am, however, on track. I will need to re-evaluate my views on whether a professed atheist is capable of moral action. God does not give us an infinite number of chances.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 4:36:24 AM)

It is important that a community such as this which includes the homosexual community not lose heart and fall into atheism since sinfulness does not fully imply the absence of faith. So long as there is faith there is hope. Remain strong.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 4:50:26 AM)

Moral perfection is achievable through grace since God is the final arbiter. You could say, God holds a magic wand of sorts. He or she achieved moral perfection because God said so. It is what God thinks that matters. It is not what we think that matters.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 5:11:28 AM)

It could be said that God messes with our universe to show us who is Dom and who is not.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 5:22:01 AM)

Moral perfection is very Dom/Domme.




MrBukani -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 6:04:56 AM)

Godverdomme!
thats dutch and I made an art of saying it.
Its an anti authority thing.[:D]
Its like god damn me
but actually it says god dumb me




GotSteel -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 7:19:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
In other words, empiricism cannot be used to resolve moral problems.


It works a whole lot better than superstition. You won't find oh say secular humanists oppressing homosexuals for Jesus.

Sadly the same can't be said for Christians.




GotSteel -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 7:28:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: http://epiphenom.fieldofscience.com/2009/03/whats-connection-between-religion-and.html
Unsurprisingly, religious people were more likely to be homophobic - in fact, religion was one of the strongest predictors of attitudes to homosexuals.

It also turned out that more religious people were more likely to be authoritarian, conservative, poorer, and Protestant - all factors that also predicted homophobia. Women were also more likely to be religious, but less likely than men to be homophobic.

But even after taking all this into account, religious people were still more likely to be homophobic. In other words, an authoritarian conservative is even more likely to be homophobic if they are also religious. Women are more likely to be homophobic if they are religious. Among all the possible factors they explored, two stuck out as being much more powerful predictors of homophobia than the rest: conservatism and religiosity.

So it seems that religion really does make people homophobic. Now, the interesting thing is that, although religion was also linked to racism, the link was extremely weak. So it doesn't seem that religion in general is acting to strengthen group identification. The implication of this is that religion really does powerfully add to homophobia because of its moral condemnation.




GotSteel -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 7:50:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
In other words, empiricism cannot be used to resolve moral problems.


It works a whole lot better than superstition. You won't find oh say secular humanists oppressing homosexuals for Jesus.

Sadly the same can't be said for Christians.


It's the more secular among you who dragged our civilization out of the witch burning insanity of the dark ages which christianity cast us into in the first place. Not the other way around.




GotSteel -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 7:52:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
It's the more secular among you who dragged our civilization out of the witch burning insanity of the dark ages which christianity cast us into in the first place. Not the other way around.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Winston Churchill
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient" Rome.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 11:37:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

Godverdomme!
thats dutch and I made an art of saying it.
Its an anti authority thing.[:D]
...
but actually it says god dumb me



What MrBukani wrote is not atheism. What GotSteel wrote is.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 12:06:15 PM)

It should be obvious why what MrBukani wrote is not atheism, but what GotSteel is. What MrBukani wrote is a call to humility. What GotSteel wrote is not. What GotSteel is saying is I do not like it, it is therefore false. What MrBukani wrote is a request for authority to be moderate. Moderation is temperance which is a cardinal virtue.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 12:32:58 PM)

White magick involves agreeable things. It is deceptive in that things which are agreeable need not be true.




xssve -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 12:42:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

Moral perfection is achievable through grace since God is the final arbiter. You could say, God holds a magic wand of sorts. He or she achieved moral perfection because God said so. It is what God thinks that matters. It is not what we think that matters.

Ah, see? Now that's Calvinism, not Christianity.




BenevolentM -> RE: Benevolent's Taxonomy of Atheism (3/18/2012 1:08:44 PM)

quote:

The Beatitudes Matthew 5:3–12 New American Standard Bible

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.


There are limits to what one can do, however. There are taboos, that is lines that one should not cross. A person can get carried away and forget that you cannot have it all one way or the other. The taboos I am guessing fall under the category of prudence which is a cardinal virtue.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.054688E-02