Kainundeva
Posts: 79
Joined: 2/12/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM quote:
ORIGINAL: Kainundeva the state HAS to be secular because if he is not, he has to choose which religion it supports... and that leaves the other religions second class. This is certainly the conventional wisdom, the so-called pillar of present day Western society. It is deceptively false, however. I will not merely claim that it is false, I will provide argument. Such a government is a theocracy by necessity since atheism is a religion. Atheism is inconsistent with all religions. There is inconsistency and there is inconsistency. This is a strong inconsistency much like a rejection of hypocrisy with solidarity is a strong inconsistency. We can live with the weak inconsistencies. Secularism is not the solution to the problem. There is another solution candidate which is known as compromise which I believe is the road that was taken by Freemasonry. Modern politics, in the United States at least, is broken. Failure to strive to achieve a balance is a sign as well that the actors are atheists and have only given lip service to their faith if they have professed a faith. it is not necessary that a government has to be atheist if it is secular. because it does not deny god... it just does not interfere with him/her. if it is secular, it just is neutral. which does not make it atheist. it´s just not taking sides. it does not say there is a god, it does not say there is no god. so it is not atheist. it is maybetheist-and-if-dunno-which. i myself, after thinking about that, do not consider myself as atheist. i consider myself as maybetheist.
|