Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xssve Yes, "real money", as in money that represents actual assets, and goods and services being exchanged, as opposed to money that represents assets, goods and services that are presumed to be created and exchanged at some future date. Some of that is obviously necessary, fiat currency itself is basically an IOU, and new wealth creation has to be financed somehow, if it isn't going to get zero sum, i.e., credit is a necessary tool for economic expansion - but it ain't magic, and in any credit scheme, the subsequent production of real performing assets is the difference between economics and magical thinking. In this case, just like in the 80's S&L debacle, credit was extended to make a buttload of heavily inflated, nonperforming assets i.e., it looked like real money, but it turned out not to be. It seems to happen in every republican administration anymore, they really love those real estate bubbles. This confirms the confusion. ALL money is fiat--even if we traded only in gold.
|