xssve -> RE: Blending politics and religion (3/20/2012 8:56:31 AM)
|
I suppose it confuses you because you swallowed the Kool-Aid that there's some kind of war on Christianity by secular humanism, when it's pretty obviously the other way around. Allow me to explain: secularism and humanism do not equate to atheism, a number of Christian philosophers have advanced the concept of secularism, and were key in the development of the concepts of both secularism and humanism, Jesus was a humanist. You're probably confusing "religion" with "dogmatism", which is merely one of the many faces of religious belief, not it's sole substance, more like a form of religious autism. It's not a "war on religion", it's a criticism of a particular breed of inflexible dogmatism in which many religious people share, and such criticisms are both our right and duty under the constitution, when dogmatists try to write public policy according to their own notions without the consent of the governed. Authority junkies by nature, it's habitual with inflexible dogmatists to claim monopolies of belief, and recast their critics as "enemies" or benightedly incapable of governing themselves, a deception whereby the consent requirement can be effectively abrogated. There may be no better critique of inflexible dogmatism than that portion of the synoptic gospels collectively referred to as The Woes of the Pharisees, and no, inflexible dogmatism isn't necessarily confined to religion.
|
|
|
|