Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Santorum's revisionism


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Santorum's revisionism Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Santorum's revisionism - 4/5/2012 7:52:57 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline 		He claims that, if he rewrites history, he's not doing so badly.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Santorum's revisionism - 4/5/2012 8:19:22 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		So What. Santorum will not be the nominee..He is behind in his home state by 8 % ,,

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Santorum's revisionism - 4/5/2012 9:26:17 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		He`s not quiting though.

Said he knows he can`t win but wants to instead,deny Wilard enough delegates for a clear win.

Which is possible.

Then.....................Mittens will HAVE to make Rick his VP mate........I meant "mate" in the non-sexual way of course......

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Santorum's revisionism - 4/5/2012 9:57:32 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/06/us/politics/rick-santorum-meets-with-conservative-leaders.html


A group of conservative leaders met with Rick Santorum on Thursday to consider various strategies to help his faltering campaign for the Republican presidential nomination, including some discussion of how to persuade Newt Gingrich to drop out of the contest.



He`s not go`n anywhere......

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 4/5/2012 9:58:03 PM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Santorum's revisionism - 4/5/2012 11:02:26 PM   
SoftBonds


Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline 		Odds of Mitt keeping anyone else from getting 50% of the delegates are about 100% now. Odds of Mitt getting more than anyone else are 99%, and odds that he gets more than 50% himself are like 96%. Rick is gone already, he is in it for a different reason.
The republican party, absent a VP or incumbent President, always selects the candidate from the previous election that does the best, then steps down for the good of the party. That is why I knew Mitt would be the nominee a year ago (actually, I knew it when Obama won the election). Rick needs to hang on long enough to knock Newt out of the running for the automatic slot in the 2016 race. Good news for dems, Rick Santorum will be the Republican nominee in 2016...

_____________________________

Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)

The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Santorum's revisionism - 4/6/2012 2:32:54 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Which is possible.


Not in any practical sense.
Romney is all but mathematically assured of a majority of delegates.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Santorum's revisionism - 4/6/2012 2:35:06 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Good news for dems, Rick Santorum will be the Republican nominee in 2016...


Whoever Romney picks as VP is the presumptive nominee for 2020.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Santorum's revisionism - 4/6/2012 4:37:27 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Romney is all but mathematically assured of a majority of delegates.


Agreed. Romney has over 50% of assigned delegates at this point. The GOP leaders have conceded that he's going to win, which makes people less likely to vote for Santorum/Gingrich/Paul. So his majority will increase. It's in the bag.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 8
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Santorum's revisionism Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094