RE: Would you do xxxxx? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message


RedMagic1 -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/9/2012 3:47:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alecta
Don't be snarky, RedMage, it's unbecoming :)

I can't tell whether you're joking, but perhaps we're even, because you might not have realized that I wasn't being snarky.

My only agenda with that post was to compliment you, and to deprecate my own powers of observation.




JeffBC -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/9/2012 4:11:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: poise
I am so much more than just my pussy...

I know, right? The guy glossed over the best parts. You have fingers... fingers that can move parcheesi pieces

I would've gone with a rule more like, "She shall always wear gloves when it is below 45f so her fingers are always nimble.




Alecta -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/9/2012 6:08:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: poise

Rule #1 - my slut will have a full bush on her.
What if it isn't capable of being bushy? Lot's of women are naturally pretty sparse down there, and he would be missing out on all the other
wonderful qualities I can bring to the table, if it weren't for my inadequate pussy?

It seems that any slut of his would be competing against her pussy for his attention, not other subs.


Don't be discouraged, poise, it was never stipulated where on the slut the bush need reside, nor if it needs to be her natural own... building a fake bush was definitely one of my life's more interesting non-BDSM moments.

A slut by pedestrian definitions is nothing more than a sex object. I think we're fine on Master being more concerned about her pussy than her mind the moment that title was rolled out.




poise -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/9/2012 6:28:33 PM)

You mean, chia pets aren't just for window sills anymore?
Thank you Alecta. I feel much better now, and my pussy no longer feels inferior.

There are oh so many images that could accompany this post, but I don't want Jeff
smacking my oh so nimble fingers with a ruler for posting them on his thread.
Oh BurntKitty!!!! Kalikshama?




sunshinemiss -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/9/2012 6:38:02 PM)

quote:

but I don't want Jeff
smacking my oh so nimble fingers with a ruler for posting them on his thread.


Liar.




Alecta -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/9/2012 8:22:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: poise
There are oh so many images that could accompany this post, but I don't want Jeff
smacking my oh so nimble fingers with a ruler for posting them on his thread.


PM? Please? I'd love to see lol




kalikshama -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/10/2012 6:52:49 AM)

I google imaged "inferior pussy" and got this [:D]

[image]http://www.styleite.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/i_have_the_pussy_so_i_make_the_rules_tshirt-p235288110496412911qn8v_400.jpg[/image]

Cheezburger wasn't much help either:

[image]http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/funny-pictures-gib-meh-liberty-or-gib-meh-fluff.jpg[/image]








poise -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/10/2012 6:57:45 AM)

Weeeeeeeeee! I knew you'd come through!
I did send some images to Alecta, and told her that she was the first one I ever sent pussy pics to. [8D]
She actually had the one image I was thinking of in regards to the Chia. With instructions, no less!




kalikshama -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/10/2012 7:08:56 AM)

I highly recommend NOT searching for "Chia Pussy" with Safe Search Off [:'(]

"Chia kitteh" was fun:

[image]http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/7/128705816877790379.jpg[/image]

[image]http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/1/31/chiakittehd128463137888906250.jpg[/image]







caelestis -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/13/2012 7:23:04 PM)

While I'd like to parrot another poster and just say I can't imagine that I'd be interested in someone who would have rules like that (or give off such a nasty vibe) for the sake of things, I'll pretend.

The only one I think I'd really have trouble with is fighting for attention. That leaves a horribly bad taste in my mouth, probably based on the fact that while in a D/s relationship I'm very attentive. I strive to please and attend to all wants before they're even voiced, I like working hard to make my D happy. If that doesn't earn me attention, and to get it I've got to have some sort of spat with someone else who probably doesn't do all that for him? Pfft!




sirfox27 -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/16/2012 8:32:11 PM)

where do I sign up for the kinky dating 101 class.




kalikshama -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/17/2012 8:55:34 AM)

Kinky dating is just like vanilla dating until you're in the bedroom.




subbyinlosangele -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/17/2012 3:54:52 PM)

Personally, I am not a fan of people who try to declare their dominance to the world at large in such a strident way. The more someone feels compelled to write a long, specific, and non-negotiable list of their requirements, the less likely I am going to like them as a person. The people I connect with on CM are those who present themselves as human beings, and treat others as human beings, rather than leading with their kinks and fetishes. Because until I know, like and respect someone as a person, I don't give a crap what their kinks and fetishes are. Generally, I find people who lead with kinks and fetishes to be cartoony.




Kaliko -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/17/2012 6:04:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Kinky dating is just like vanilla dating until you're in the bedroom.



Wait...I'm supposed to wait until I'm in the bedroom?






NuevaVida -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/17/2012 10:59:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

OK, we got a necro thread back from the grave -- Any subs feel they can adhere... -- but it did get me thinking. I read that list of 9 items and my first thought was that most of those seemed pretty tame. The one about being exposed anywhere, anytime is a deal breaker for almost everyone... yada yada... But then I stepped back a moment and actually looked at the question.

The obvious thought that popped into my head was, "for whom?" I mean... doesn't the d-type matter at all in these sorts of questions? God knows Carol's responses to me are not exactly similar to her responses to previous lovers.

So I'm kind of curious. If you are an s-type of some sort and you are currently unowned, do you answer questions like that? If so, how?

A list like that makes me think the person who created it previously had a slave/submissive who did those things, and he is trying to recreate it.

I remember when my former owner was talking to other "prospects" and he'd start asking them right off, if they'd do this or that. I'd think Holy Moly are you kidding me? Took me years to get to that point - did he forget that? It was really bizarre to me.

So yeah it's all an "it depends" thing. How much have I invested myself in him? How great is the trust factor? What am I ready for, or what is just going to be unhealthy for me? Or - - what am I capable of? For example, the "competing" requirement. I just don't compete for attention. I don't have it in me; there's no drive for that. I either have his attention or I don't. If his attention is centered on someone else, I wish them well and go away.

So that whole list that was originally presented would just be dumb to me, if presented as an intro type of communication. Like Des said, it's a list of activities and has nothing to do with developing a relationship of any kind. To me that's just putting the cart before the horse, and I'd move along.




littlecherie -> RE: Would you do xxxxx? (4/18/2012 6:50:38 AM)

I think you can answer that in a thing where you expect it to happen, this way or that.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125