Politesub53
Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Raiikun quote:
ORIGINAL: Nosathro Then let see the records And that goes for you as well. You were debating as if you have no trouble accepting the donation money was real, and that information came from the same source that stated clearly in court that Zimmerman's nose was broken. Why all the picking and choosing what you want to believe is real, even when it comes from the same source? Your own intellectual dishonesty in this debate makes me laugh, you cherry pick parts of a statement that support your defence of Zimmerman, while ignoring the facts that dont. Then you have the nerve to accuse others of doing the very same fling and you threaten to flounce out of the debate. You have posted elsewere the text of what was said in court, so i will do you a favour and use the same. This quote is very telling though, because the detective says the evidnce points to Zimmermans version of what took place to be a lie. quote:
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Mr. Gilbreath, I didn't know we were going to be trying the case, I'm going to add up -- I apologize. I want to add some questions to -- you had reviewed or other members of the team had reviewed his interviews, is that not true. GILBREATH: That is -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And he gave -- he the defendant gave numerous interviews to the police did he not. GILBREATH: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And isn't it true that a lot of statements that he made do not make sense in terms of the injuries that he described. Did he not describe to the police that Mr. Martin had him on the ground and kept bashing his head on the concrete over and over and just physically beating him with his hands? GILBREATH: He has said that, yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And isn't it true that there is evidence that indicates that's not true? GILBREATH: Yes.
|