Killerangel -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/15/2012 12:56:37 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bucephalus quote:
ORIGINAL: Killerangel Btw, in your journal you state you are looking for 24/7 female slaves only. If you're going by the rules of ancient Rome and also stating in this thread that a slave of either sex is a possession, then why are you allowed to specify gender for yourself but a lesbian cannot specify the gender she wishes to deal with? I was about to say something along these lines, however, in ancient rome, the master was able to pick his slaves. I doubt they did so by gender, but more by what work was needed to be done, so by this archaic logic, He can look for whatever he wants, but she can not look for what she wants. Then again, by becoming a slave, by this logic, she also gives up all basic human rights she has, and everything that happens to her is placed onto her owner's shoulders. That all said, I agree. With what was said previously. It's not ancient Rome. things are different. Even as a modern slave, she does have a right to consent and choose just as much as the prospective master/mistress does. The point of my post was that the OP argued that slaves are just property so why is he going against what he is saying and specifying a sex for his own slaves if it doesn't and shouldn't matter to anyone? After all the OP states he doesn't buy a girls car or a mans car, it's just a car. By that reasoning why does he need to have a woman for his 24/7 slave?
|
|
|
|