RE: Lesbian Slavery ?

RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

antipode -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/15/2012 6:01:28 PM)
Tell you what: if we ever need you to write our rulebook, we'll call you. Trust me on that.

JeffBC -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/15/2012 7:29:11 PM)
quote: dominate4utwo said Any woman that insists on being labeled lesbian should declare themselves as Sub and not Slave ! ROFL... you know what the really funny thing is? I absolutely agree with you... at least insofar as myself and Carol. Yet I still think you're an idiot.

MistressDarkArt -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/15/2012 8:55:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist I admit that most people don't fuck their vacuum cleaner, dishwasher or other domestic equipment Good thing you said 'most', RS. As a youngster I not only had relations with the vacuum cleaner, but the electric toothbrush, shower head and garden hose as well. They were absolutely mute on the subject of their orientation/identity but I didn't hear them call limit or safe out...so I used 'em!

Hillwilliam -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 5:38:38 AM)
Here I am being called out of line a coupla months ago for saying that someone who identifies as a 'slave' shouldn't have 'housework' as a hard limit.[8\|]

MissImmortalPain -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 6:18:31 AM)
Fr I can't stop myself from saying this.... This is not Rome. This is Sparta. The rules have changed. By the way that whole thing about not buying a female car or a male one is bs. When you want a truck you don't shop for a station wagon and when you want a hot litte sports car you don't go looking for it at a tractor dealership.

DarkSteven -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 6:21:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain By the way that whole thing about not buying a female car or a male one is bs. When you want a truck you don't shop for a station wagon and when you want a hot litte sports car you don't go looking for it at a tractor dealership. MIP, you have it backwards. He's demanding the right to pick what slave HE wants. He's saying that the truck/station wagon/whatever vehicle should not have the right to decline its owner. IOW, he gets to pick whomever he wants and the slave has no say.

MissImmortalPain -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 6:26:30 AM)
Steven I like you a lot, don't make me smack you. I do not have it backwards. He is saying a slave is a slave and car is a car and that he should be allowed to expect the station wagon to do the same kind of work a truck does. Which is great logic if you want to burn out a motor or screw up a tranny (transmission that is)

fucktoyprincess -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 6:27:17 AM)
Slavery as it existed in Ancient Rome does not exist. You are welcome to define any of these things as you choose. Your prerogative. But please don't expect others to share your unique take on things. Also, please make sure others with whom you play are aware of your particular definitions to things, because you are defining things in a way that does not reflect most people's understanding. Most people identifying as "slave" are not interested one bit in forced bisexuality. A separate note of advice. If what you seek is a bisexual slave, then why don't you just search for that explicitly and not get so hung up on whether the term slave in and of itself encompasses bisexuality or not. Most of us who are searching are searching for like-minded partners. So just be explicit about what you want, and search for that. Stop criticizing others for using labels in the more "mainstream" way when you have a very unusual perspective on what certain terms mean. Again, it is a safe assumption that most who identify as "slave" do NOT seek forced bisexuality.

littlecherie -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 6:27:17 AM)
Wait, what? I can't take the OP seriously. Moving on.

ResidentSadist -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 7:47:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDarkArt quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist I admit that most people don't fuck their vacuum cleaner, dishwasher or other domestic equipment Good thing you said 'most', RS. As a youngster I not only had relations with the vacuum cleaner, but the electric toothbrush, shower head and garden hose as well. They were absolutely mute on the subject of their orientation/identity but I didn't hear them call limit or safe out...so I used 'em! I'm pretty sure my toothbrush is a lesbian slave. Being an old fart, I have heard a lot of stories. You may like to know that those vibrating electric toothbrushes often found good purpose other than cleaning teeth. You are not alone.

casikat -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 7:53:09 PM)
quote: A slave of either sex is a possession. Yup, thats the way I was trained (all be it many moons ago). Your purpose in life is to make your owner happy in return you get the pleasure of serving them such is the heart of the slave.

Blankpain -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 8:11:20 PM)
I can't help but think there are natural slaves - which may be a consequence of breeding, perhaps from the ancient ruins of Roma!

DomMale46 -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 8:19:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dominate4utwo [align=left]When I go and buy a car or other possession. I don't buy a girls car or mans car ...its just a car. A slave of either sex is a possession. As in Ancient Rome. All slaves wether by consent or by force are Bi. An owners responsibility is to maintain their health. And the small detail that slaves in Rome could buy their freedom. Unlike a car.

ResidentSadist -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/16/2012 8:55:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dominate4utwo When I go and buy a car or other possession. I don't buy a girls car or mans car ...its just a car... I take it you're not driving a hot pink MiniCooper? [img]http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2543/3733770598_f166682902.jpg[/img] Girl's car . . . just sayin' [img]http://trus.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pTRU1-5807089reg.jpg[/img] Other possession: Girl's vacuum.

kalikshama -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/17/2012 4:09:29 AM)
quote: (all be it many moons ago) psst - it's albeit. Origin: 1350–1400; Middle English al be it al(though) it be

MistressDarkArt -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/17/2012 7:59:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist [img]http://trus.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pTRU1-5807089reg.jpg[/img] Other possession: Girl's vacuum. Dang, RS! That pretty pink thang's got me salivatin'...oh, the memories!!

subbyinlosangele -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/17/2012 8:09:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dominate4utwo When I go and buy a car or other possession. I don't buy a girls car or mans car ...its just a car. A slave of either sex is a possession. As in Ancient Rome. All slaves wether by consent or by force are Bi. An owners responsibility is to maintain their health. Any woman that insists on being labeled lesbian should declare themselves as Sub and not Slave ! Realistically, whether someone describes themselves as a sub or a slave, the label is nothing more than a starting point for discussion. It doesn't really matter if someone calls themselves a "lesbian slave" or a "lesbian sub" -- what matters is their explanation of what that means to anyone who it concerns. And, since you're a man, I suspect very few women who call themselves lesbian slaves will care much what your personal definition of a "slave" is. My guess is this thread is really just a rant over your anger that lesbian slaves keep turning you down because you're not the sex they want (among other reasons, possibly).

DarkSteven -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/18/2012 3:42:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subbyinlosangele Realistically, whether someone describes themselves as a sub or a slave, the label is nothing more than a starting point for discussion. It doesn't really matter if someone calls themselves a "lesbian slave" or a "lesbian sub" -- what matters is their explanation of what that means to anyone who it concerns. And, since you're a man, I suspect very few women who call themselves lesbian slaves will care much what your personal definition of a "slave" is. My guess is this thread is really just a rant over your anger that lesbian slaves keep turning you down because you're not the sex they want (among other reasons, possibly). [sm=agree.gif][sm=goodpost.gif]

Alecta -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/18/2012 3:51:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dominate4utwo When I go and buy a car or other possession. I don't buy a girls car or mans car ...its just a car. A slave of either sex is a possession. As in Ancient Rome. All slaves wether by consent or by force are Bi. An owners responsibility is to maintain their health. Any woman that insists on being labeled lesbian should declare themselves as Sub and not Slave ! Without going into the sham of BDSM slavery vs "real slavery", I agree with the logic to the first part, but your conclusion is pure fallacy. Sexual orientation is a personal identity, not a function. Following the logic presented, what orientation a slave is does not matter, as it is merely an indication of what the slave is, of its own accord and nature, attracted to. Engaging in heterosexual acts does not make the slave hetereo or bi if she identifies as lesbian. She did them because it was Master's orders, not because she wanted to. Therefore, she is still a lesbian, and in fact the conclusion should have been that it shouldn't matter to the Master what the slave insists on being labelled as if she'll do as told.

Bhruic -> RE: Lesbian Slavery ? (4/18/2012 6:44:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Killerangel Btw, in your journal you state you are looking for 24/7 female slaves only. If you're going by the rules of ancient Rome and also stating in this thread that a slave of either sex is a possession, then why are you allowed to specify gender for yourself but a lesbian cannot specify the gender she wishes to deal with? Because he's a guy, and he wants lesbian slaves but they won't have him hehehe.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875