RE: Looking for a "True" .......

RE: Looking for a "True" ....... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

LadyPact -> RE: Looking for a "True" ....... (4/30/2012 2:37:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AurumCaminus Of course there are. But the only ones that I have even heard of that have a significantly higher female/male ratio do have that policy. If that really was in reply to what I wrote, it didn't even make sense. Let's make this easy so we both understand each other. How many munch groups have you attended? Have you been to any of the groups play parties or events? What, exactly, gave you the impression that males were not welcome there? Were other single males in attendance when you went?

OsideGirl -> RE: Looking for a "True" ....... (4/30/2012 7:31:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AurumCaminus quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl quote: ORIGINAL: petitverdot (mind you, I'm a woman and women outnumber the men tenfold). Generally, it's the other way around. Men far outnumber the women, although I've heard that some areas in realtime it's the opposite. To which 5,000 guys say, "And exactly where are these real life place?" LilyBoPeep has said that her area has more women than men at the events....and I believe Steven said the same about his area. Out here in SoCal, men outnumber women somewhere around 10:1.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Looking for a "True" ....... (4/30/2012 7:07:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AurumCaminus I keep seeing in many of the profiles here stuff like, I'm only interested in a REAL Dom, or True slaves only, or I want a Master not any of you wannabes. Is it just me or are there others who find the hubris of such comments quite the turn off? Exactly how is it that the writer's of such comments expectations gets to define the validity of how someone wishes to identify themselves? Everyone has different needs and values, and its actually rare for two people's needs to match. However I usually find that the authenticity of how someone defines themselves tends to be more of a function of what they expect of themselves then what they want of others. But what do I know, obviously I'm just another of those wannabe losers. Well, that's what I was thinking but.... I think it's just you.

AurumCaminus -> RE: Looking for a "True" ....... (4/30/2012 10:14:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie Well, that's what I was thinking but.... I think it's just you. I do indeed seem to be in the minority. Lol

DommesLesEnigma -> RE: Looking for a "True" ....... (5/5/2012 2:55:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Whenready I can see where someone might post "true Doms only please" in frustration after receiving the 50th (or 500th) scam mail. My sense of mischief also leads me to: aurum caminus = latin for hearth of gold - leads to (in MY mind) gold = the real deal = not fake = true.... make of that (non)sense what you will. Be happy. agreed

Master2811 -> RE: Looking for a "True" ....... (5/6/2012 7:05:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AurumCaminus I keep seeing in many of the profiles here stuff like, I'm only interested in a REAL Dom, or True slaves only, or I want a Master not any of you wannabes. Is it just me or are there others who find the hubris of such comments quite the turn off? Exactly how is it that the writer's of such comments expectations gets to define the validity of how someone wishes to identify themselves? Everyone has different needs and values, and its actually rare for two people's needs to match. However I usually find that the authenticity of how someone defines themselves tends to be more of a function of what they expect of themselves then what they want of others. But what do I know, obviously I'm just another of those wannabe losers. Perhaps those persons putting personals on the net engaged in communicating with people who exactly did what was not wanted. And if that happens a few times one might become frustrated and then putting those personals on the internet? I have no problem with such personals.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

2.929688E-02