RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DesideriScuri -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/3/2012 8:41:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
FR
This thread, like so many before and countless more to come, I suspect, turns on the question of whether a few nut jobs--anarchists who dream of blowing up bridges or a preacher who advocates beating LGBT youth, to take two current examples--represent an entire movement.
The answer seems to depend on how one views said movement and whether one seeks handy examples for discrediting it.


Actually, the answer depends on whether or not you're telling the truth or not. It's possible that these examples are indicative, but highly unlikely. I also hold the belief that neither of the examples is indicative of anything other than 6 dickwads being stupid.

The extrapolations come from both sides of the aisle, and are then routinely criticized by the other side of the aisle. The worst thing is that there are maroons aligned with one side or the other that eat that shit up. Critical thinking is becoming something lost on the majority.




SternSkipper -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/3/2012 9:07:35 PM)

Before I wash mt\y hands of this waste of effort... Your estimate is ALMOST exactly on the money. As my brother called it "five morons and on CI".

You can think of significant aspects in the development of criminal cases such as 'extrapolation' or whatever. As any lawyer worth his/her fee will tell you though... THEY'RE NOT

quote:

The extrapolations come from both sides of the aisle, and are then routinely criticized by the other side of the aisle. The worst thing is that there are maroons aligned with one side or the other that eat that shit up. Critical thinking is becoming something lost on the majority.


The only thing more amazing to me than the miracle of birth is watching people separating themselves from the fray they're jumping into in an effort to grab some non-existent intellectual high ground.[:D]




Marini -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/3/2012 9:45:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

This thread, like so many before and countless more to come, I suspect, turns on the question of whether a few nut jobs--anarchists who dream of blowing up bridges or a preacher who advocates beating LGBT youth, to take two current examples--represent an entire movement.

The answer seems to depend on how one views said movement and whether one seeks handy examples for discrediting it.


[sm=applause.gif]
Bravo!
Very well stated, I have been thinking the same thing for a while.
It's amazing how many non-believers enjoy ranting about a few obscure lunatics,
and attempt to paint many believers, with the same brush.

[sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]
I agree with the endless threads!
They are going to beat this horse to death, but won't stop then, they
they will beat the dead horse into the ground, and than continue beating
the ground until they fall dead into the hole.




Real0ne -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/4/2012 3:14:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

From LizDeluxe's link:

"Bill Dobbs, a spokesman for Occupy in New York, also said the arrests have nothing to do with the Occupy movement that began last fall.
"This incident has nothing to do with Occupy Wall Street, which explicitly stands for non-violence," he said."






And what else is a spokehole going to say, Peon? I think the statements of the suspects are clearer and cleaner than anything he'll come up with. Watch for the spin to move towards entrapment, if the whole story doesn't just dry up and blow away.

It won't be easy for the Occupists to clean house, and clean up their image, because they deliberately don't have a house to clean.




any group that runs contrary to our beloved gubafia gets infiltrated and publically destroyed.

Lets start with MLK who nearly took over america!

that aside people believed bush didnt they? Obama, didnt they? all the other pie holes of the day.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/4/2012 8:04:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

Thanks SternSkipper. Seems like we can put this one to rest....(but no, I'm sure this will still NOT be the end of this from those who simply choose to ignore the facts). I'm gonna go bake some brownies. Enough.


Make the Ron Paul Double Fudge with the weed in em... I love those they make it almost seem like there was a republican primary.[8D]


I would, but then I will be locked up in a jail cell for four days and ignored and end up hospitalized for kidney damage - isn't that how the DEA deals with drug offenses these days?




SternSkipper -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/4/2012 8:55:06 AM)

quote:

I would, but then I will be locked up in a jail cell for four days and ignored and end up hospitalized for kidney damage - isn't that how the DEA deals with drug offenses these days?


Yeah, but that's only at the DEA's place. If you come over my place with weed brownies.... SURE, you might end up tied to the furniture, but I can guarantee two things. A) Captivity at my place is both Romantic and FUN. And B) I honor the "must go potty" safe words[8D]




SternSkipper -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/4/2012 9:14:45 AM)

quote:

quote:

this post's title of "fun loving Occupy bridge bombers" is simply inaccurate.

I'm not sure accuracy is the OP's strong suit.


That's putting it politely.




SternSkipper -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/4/2012 9:16:16 AM)

quote:

I agree with the endless threads!
They are going to beat this horse to death, but won't stop then, they
they will beat the dead horse into the ground, and than continue beating
the ground until they fall dead into the hole.


Marini ... DC ... There's a 911 situation in the Zimmerman thread[:D]




Aylee -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/4/2012 8:02:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

he made the facebook page. thats deep....
yeah loughner was a only lib cos he had mein kamph in his reading material!


Actually, I was going with his voter registration.

I prefer nutcase to liberal in this, though.

Loughner was Looney-tunes. And that would be perfectly acceptable if it was not the left saying that it was Former-Governor-Palin's fault because of her website.

In the case of Mr. Baxter and the Cleveland Five, you have a group making plans at one Occupy activity. Organizing another, and then trying to set off a bomb during a third. And then you say that he has nothing to do with the Occupy movement. Is it because tap-dancing was not involved?

And ya all want to compare this to Waco?

If the Cleveland Five had moved themselves off by themselves (like the Branch Davidians) and decided to live and let live (or be raptured, whatever the case may be), that would be a different story.

I am not real happy with Waco. Or Ruby Ridge. Or Eilian Gonzalas.




SternSkipper -> RE: Just some fun loving Occupy bridge bombers (5/5/2012 11:09:44 AM)

quote:

I prefer nutcase to liberal in this, though.

Loughner was Looney-tunes. And that would be perfectly acceptable if it was not the left saying that it was Former-Governor-Palin's fault because of her website.


Digress much? Anyway, since we're on the topic of voter registration and
you want to talk in weird little unfounded conjecture based on right wing questionable publications, let's just skip all the 'tap dancing' metaphors and since voter registration is okay to invoke.
Tell us about the intense pride you felt when Republican Timothy McVeigh murdered all those people in Oklahoma on the wave of Janet Reno bashing that republicans engaged in so heavily in their efforts to discredit Bill Clinton's administration back in the 90s.
And don't say it had nothing to do with it. The defense referred to this stand-up, 'honest' conservative young man who one day read the "Turner Diaries" and set off on his project of murder.
I would submit that if you wish to point to the 'involvement' which as the ACTUAL facts emerge instead of the A' la Loughner method of disseminating information you and others now resort to, that you not forget the rich history of 'patriots' republicans have treated us to in the past. (wonder no more why "tea party patiot" freaks so many people out)
And PLEASE, no matter what it takes, stay away from trigger literature, like the "Turner Diaries". It's already been proven out to be something this country can't take much more of

quote:


If the Cleveland Five had moved themselves off by themselves (like the Branch Davidians) and decided to live and let live (or be raptured, whatever the case may be), that would be a different story.


Branch Davidians???? HELLOOOOOOO in there... those were right wing poster children for the savagery of Janet Reno & Bill Clinton.
NO, MY DEAR YOUR CREW OWNS THOSE GASOLINE TOTING PEDERASTS.
Yet again the a rightie has to be asked to keep their fascination with pushing their degenerates off on liberals. Sorry... no takers today.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.515625E-02