kalikshama
Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
|
I agree that Edwards is a scumbucket. I've been very vocal on other parts of the boards with my opinion of married cheaters.
However, I am not convinced he broke the law if the funds used were solicited for hiding the mistress and totally separate from campaign contributions.
Regarding Young:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/john-edwards-defense-depicts-andrew-young-money-hungry/story?id=16219752#.T6fuJC_XVy4
April 26, 2012
John Edwards' defense team battered the credibility of a key prosecution witness today, getting Andrew Young to admit that he double dipped on hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of expenses while hiding Edwards' pregnant mistress.
Defense lawyer Abbe Lowell also raised doubts about a series of statements that Young has made, and bolstered the defense's argument that Young used Edwards' sex scandal to enrich himself.
In a barrage of questions, Lowell suggested that Young volunteered to claim paternity for Edwards' pregnant mistress to make Edwards more indebted to him, and raised the possibility that it was Young who alerted the National Enquirer to the scandal, a suggestion Young denied.
Young is a crucial witness for the prosecution which accuses Edwards of using illegal donations from two supporters to hide the pregnancy of mistress Rielle Hunter during the 2008 presidential campaign. Edwards, who twice ran for the presidency, could be sentenced to 30 years in prison if convicted of the charges.
Young has testified that he was assigned to keep Hunter hidden even after Edwards dropped out of the presidential race because Edwards was angling for a top spot, possibly vice president or attorney general.
Today was the second day of Lowell's grinding cross examination and he wrested a damaging admission from Young who conceded that he sought reimbursement from one of Edwards' wealthy backers -- Fred Baron -- for expenses already paid by another wealthy backer -- Rachel "Bunny" Mellon.
In March 2008, Young has testified, he provided Baron with a spread sheet of expenses he had incurred for the cover-up totalling more than $200,000.
"Were you trying to suggest to him (Baron) that you were in the hole for $200,000?" Lowell asked.
"I think that is fair to say, yes," Young replied.
What Young didn't tell Baron is that he had already paid the expenses with Mellon's money which totalled $725,000.
"All of these [expenses] were incurred at time when you had hundreds of thousands of dollars from Mrs. Mellon?" Lowell asked. "Yes sir," he replied.
"Isn't the very reason you didn't tell him (Baron) was because you wanted to solicit him and you didn't want him to know you had already gotten three quarters of a million dollars from her?" the lawyer asked.
"No sir," Young answered.
Young has testified that the reason he didn't tell Baron about Mellon's money is that Edwards had instructed him to keep each donor in the dark about the other.
Baron gave Young $335,000 to cover Hunter's expenses, records show.
Young was building a house at the time and he conceded during testimony that "a substantial amount," of Mellon's money went into finishing a house he was building, and the plans expanded to include a swimming pool, to wire the house for audio and digital, and put a guest room in the attic.
Lowell also focused on Young's contention that Edwards lobbied him to handle the pregnancy scandal by claiming paternity. The request was made, Young has claimed, in a phone call from Edwards on Dec. 13 while Young was shopping for an aquarium in a Petsmart store.
The deciding factor in agreeing to the charade, Young has said, was seeing a Newsweek magazine that had Edwards on the cover with the headline "The Sleeper," suggesting he could still win the presidency.
But Lowell produced evidence that the magazine cover was actually dated Dec. 24, and asked Young whether the Petsmart version was a made-up story.
"Wasn't claiming paternity a way for you to get Mr. Edwards to further indebted to you," Lowell asked.
"That was not a thought process at this point. It was putting out a fire," Young said.
In another effort to chip away at Young's credibility, Lowell had a flurry a questions about how the National Enquirer found out about the pregnancy, which eventually ended Edwards' political career and his marriage.
"Were you the source for the National Enquirer?" Lowell asked. "No, sir," Young replied.
"Do you know the National Enquirer's phone number?" the lawyer asked. "I do," Young said.
"Have you ever made a phone call to the National Enquirer?" Lowell asked. "I have," Young answered.
Lowell dropped the subject without offering any evidence.
Edwards' defense team also tried to establish that Edwards sought money from wealthy donors to hide the pregnancy from his wife Elizabeth Edwards, not to finance his presidential ambitions. Mrs. Edwards had earlier become aware of the affair with Hunter and had told her husband to break it off.
"It wasn't as if the campaign and the media were going [through the records,]" Lowell said to Young. "It was Mrs. Edwards. The person he was trying to avoid finding out about [the affair] was Mrs. Edwards."
|
The John Edwards trial - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread