quote:

ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain

I'll admit I didn't bother to click the links...I don't think I need to. Have you ever seen a hollywood movie set in say New York where people are shooting at each other? Do you unerstand that parts of different cities can be rented for such things? There is also the fact that laws differ country to country. So some things that can't be filmed in some places can in others.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ishtarr
These are NOT porno sets. Theses are in fact exactly the public places they show in the video, in broad daylight with a bunch of random strangers around.

quote:

As you said, the laws must be much less puritanical than those in the USA - where such conduct would have you jailed, even if it were for a movie.

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

These look like they were shot in public spaces to me, but I think I agree with graceadieu that some of these shots look like they were done in a controlled area. I, personally, didn't see children passerbys in these scenes. If there were, then clearly, the standards for what children can see is different in these countries. It did seem that actual oral/vaginal sex (i.e., real male penis inside) was all in slightly more "private" spaces within the outdoors (I didn't see a bunch of people watching the actors have sex). Penetrative play with a dildo seems to fall under a different category, as that type of play seemed to occur with unsuspecting people (or extras) walking by. But the nudity, being bound in public, being led on a leash all seem to be occurring in public spaces (although it is impossible to tell if the area was controlled - even perhaps by signs warning people that a porn shoot was being filmed). I'm not sure what the privacy laws are in these countries, but do they have the right to film a passerby as the walk past, and not have to get a signed release from them? I'm not sure everyone would be happy to be in a porn film as a passerby, even in a situation like this (especially depending on what you do professionally) - so this is also making me think there had to at least be signs up somewhere letting people know what was going on and that they were given their tacit consent to be in the film if they remained present in the area. I don't know. Maybe they don't care. Truly hard to say.

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu



This. If you pay enough money (probably not much in parts of Eastern Europe), you can rent out a city block or a park or whatever, shut it down, and hire a bunch of extras for $5 to walk around and be "random people on the street".

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu



This. If you pay enough money (probably not much in parts of Eastern Europe), you can rent out a city block or a park or whatever, shut it down, and hire a bunch of extras for $5 to walk around and be "random people on the street".

Bless your concepts of currency and what prices are in Eastern Europe, last time I checked they weren't much lower than the rest of Europe...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karmastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

These look like they were shot in public spaces to me, but I think I agree with graceadieu that some of these shots look like they were done in a controlled area. I, personally, didn't see children passerbys in these scenes. If there were, then clearly, the standards for what children can see is different in these countries. It did seem that actual oral/vaginal sex (i.e., real male penis inside) was all in slightly more "private" spaces within the outdoors (I didn't see a bunch of people watching the actors have sex). Penetrative play with a dildo seems to fall under a different category, as that type of play seemed to occur with unsuspecting people (or extras) walking by. But the nudity, being bound in public, being led on a leash all seem to be occurring in public spaces (although it is impossible to tell if the area was controlled - even perhaps by signs warning people that a porn shoot was being filmed). I'm not sure what the privacy laws are in these countries, but do they have the right to film a passerby as the walk past, and not have to get a signed release from them? I'm not sure everyone would be happy to be in a porn film as a passerby, even in a situation like this (especially depending on what you do professionally) - so this is also making me think there had to at least be signs up somewhere letting people know what was going on and that they were given their tacit consent to be in the film if they remained present in the area. I don't know. Maybe they don't care. Truly hard to say.

i usually agree with you, but i really doubt they posted signs. this is hit and run shooting. get a shot, move on, before you get rousted by the coppers.

and nudity is much more accepted elsewhere. the bus scene did seem extreme, but nothing a quick $20 to the driver couldn't handle. and did you notice, people were taking pictures.