ModeratorOne -> RE: Atkins diet (8/28/2004 11:17:15 AM)
|
huh? Sucrose is sugar. Pretty much anything that ends in ose is a type of sugar. Sucrose, dextrose, fructose, maltose, glucose, galactose, sorbose, xylose, mannitose etc. Really really really simply... Sugars can be monosaccharides, disaccharides and polysaccharides. A hexose is a monosaccharide with 6 carbon atoms. The 3 basic are glucose and galactose (which are aldohexoses [having an aldehyde group on one end]) and fructose (which is a ketohexose [having a keto group on one end]) Sucrose would be an example of a disaccharide because each molecule consists of 2 monosaccharides (glucose and fructose) Sucrose is not in sweet and low. Saccharin is about 300 times as sweet as sugar but can have a bitter and metallic taste. It's not digested by the body and will go right through your system so in theory it shouldn’t affect blood insulin levels. There are people who believe it may cause an insulin spike simply due to it having a sweet taste, especially in those who have a sugar addiction but I won’t get into that now. Now what happens is when sweet and low markets their product (saccharin is also used in American sugar twin and brown sugar twin) They have a bulk granular version that they try to make easily useable for cooking, a packet version which you see all over the place (the little pink packets) which are easy to use and portable and a liquid version. They also have the pure saccharin but I don’t think they sell that to regular consumers. The granular and packet versions use bulking agents like maltodextrin or in the case of sweet and low I think its dextrose so you can easily measure it, otherwise there would be a microscopic amount since its so much sweeter than sugar. Dextrose (d-glucose) isn’t being used to sweeten since it’s only half as sweet as sugar (sucrose) its used for easy manageability. The liquid version of sweet and low uses water and saccharin instead of dextrose which eliminates the starchy bulkers. I was never able to understand why they cant use something like inulin (fiber) for a bulking agent but then that would actually make sense and these companies never seem to favor the logical approach lol. Now, there is also sucraLOSE which is splenda. Sucralose is basiclly chlorinated sugar. Same problem with the bulking agents except in this case to get a liquid version of splenda you have to jump through hoops. I hope you aren’t confusing sucrose with sucralose. The problem with Atkins sweetners are with the hexols aka Sugar Alcohols. I can write for hours on sugar alcohols (and sugars for that matter lol) so I will try and be as brief and blunt as I can without boring you with too much detail. Sugar alcohols were believed to not cause a significant rise in blood sugar so they were safe. That’s not really true. Fructose also doesn’t cause a rise in blood sugar and fructose is horrible for you, but I wont get into the dangers of fructose now. Just like things that end with ose tend to be sugars, things that end with ol are often sugar alcohols. Maltitol, sorbitol, xylitol, mannitol, erythritol etc. Not all sugar alcohols are created equally. Maltitol for example is a corn derivative. Its very similar to corn syrup which is one of the reasons all these companies are jumping on the Sugar Free Candy Bandwagon. Where they used sugar and corn syrup they can now use maltitol and not get new equipment. It’s very similar in texture and flavor. Any machine that can use corn syrup can use maltitol instead very easily. Maltitol is very high on the glycemic index since it is a corn derivative. I think it may even be higher than table sugar though I am not too sure of that, I would have to look that one up. Either way, maltitol may not cause an instant blood sugar spike like regular sugar, but it is still partially absorbed. Between 50-75% of the maltitol is absorbed as sugar in your body. Its over time, but its still absorbed. When someone is eating a low carb candy bar for example and it lists 20g of sugar alcohols from maltitol you are getting between 10-15g of carbs. Many seem to feel that these are free foods and 0 carbs when they are not. Aside from junk food being junk food, there are a lot of people who are still ingesting a good amount of sugar from these candies and not realizing it. For people who have these candies once in a rare while, there are worse things you can do, but for those who eat them daily and think they are being 'healthy' they should really read up on sugar alcohols. Now, there are some sugar alcohols that are almost entirely undigested. Erythritol is the best example of that. It has a glycemic index value of 0 and is totally unabsorbed by your system. Why dont more companies use erythritol instead of maltitol? Cost for one. Grains are cheap, corn is the cheapest grain and our country has tons of it. Also the cost of new equipment needed to use erythritol over using the equipment that already exists with maltitol. Taste, maltitol tastes better and has a better texture. Maltiol can be used in a granular or syrup form, erythritol last I checked was only available in a granular form. Also erythritol is still pretty new on the market whereas maltitol has been around forever. Erythritol is slowly becoming more popular but maltitol is still the most common one. I pretty much avoid most things with maltitol and if I have something with a small amount of maltitol I would count at least half of the sugar alcohols as carbs. I will have something with erythritol slightly more frequently, but even then it isnt too often as my sweet tooth has just about vanished since low carbing. The main reason a lot of these candy manufacturers will use a sugar alcohol over something like splenda is texture. Splenda is very very sweet but has no bulk (unless you add maltodextrin which is what they do for the measurable granular form of splenda which companies dont use) sugar alcohols have lots of bulk and less sweetness. Often when you see something that claims to be sweetened with splenda if you read the ingredients they also often have sugar alcohols. Now that Ive successfully managed to bore everyone with my sugar alcohol rant I think I'll step away from the computer lol. Sorry, I sometimes get a bit carried away.
|
|
|
|