Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception - says the Holy Bible


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception - says the Holy Bible Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 12:04:29 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twenty9male

I understand your point i just think it's morally bankrupt.

Your whinging as if to say they only cared about the featus, perhaps you should have card about it a bit more and they wouldn't have had to.


Let them get their own damned fetus. This one was hers do decide what to do with, not theirs.

Don't you respect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS? Or are women some sort of "community property"?

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Twenty9male)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 12:07:04 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

And to elaborate: The stance of the pro-lifers is about nothing more than wanting to protect the unborn from being killed. So it's fallacious to then compare that with a demand to take responsibility for the child beyond just not wanting it killed, and calling it "hypocrisy".


If they're not willing to take responsibility for the child in all ways, then it's hypocritical for them to draw a line and say, "At Birth, We Don't Give A Shit Anymore"...

Which, of course, well illustrates the moral bankruptcy of all those who would consider SOMEONE ELSE'S PROPERTY to be any of their concern.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 12:09:03 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Many times "Sticking your nose into other people's business" is called "Compassion", but it's really not minding your own fucking business.



As shocking a revelation as this might be, finding life "special", and especially that of a DEFENSLESS "baby" -- be it mine or another's -- is not "sticking your nose in other people's business".  You stated, "Nothing makes any particular baby 'special' UNLESS IT'S YOURS."  Newsflash, that has exactly ZERO to do with sticking anyone's nose in another's business, as you allege.  You may selfishly only think of YOUR "baby" and not give a shit about anyone else's, but that's your failing.




If you find "Life" to be "special", WHAT DO YOU EAT?

Maybe I don't think of OTHER PEOPLE'S BABIES because THEY'RE NOT MY PROPERTY. THEY'RE OTHER PEOPLE'S.

I question the morality of anyone who covets their neighbor's children.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 12:36:07 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
 
I question the morality of anyone who couldn't give a shit about any baby/child but their own. Selfish.



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 12:46:42 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RemoteUser
Two small points to make:

i) What you know, does not define what is. You keep slamming religion in a derogatory fashion and you ask for answers, but you don't accept or contemplate the answers you request - just attack again. That action changes your approach and invalidates the whole process of learning through discussion; and the hollow remains are rhetorical. That is the point I was making. I don't have all the answers either, but I'll discuss them in the manner they are expressed. That said...

ii) Stillbirth has been referred to as miscarriage to the anger of many women who experience it. Scientifically, yes, the timing of the event does separate stillbirth and miscarriage and enforces the medical definition of life. If the medical definition is all we care about then you are spot on. The thread started with a religious perspective, however, and other than yelling your disbelief I haven't seen you make the attempt to understand the OP, only challenge.

You make a point about ritualism, but the excessive tampon reference weakens its credibility. In response, I would ask you to consider that for all the weaknesses of your fellow man, from the popular religious view it is believed that the head honcho upstairs sees and knows regardless of our ability to notice. It matters even when we're not aware of it. Equate it to crimes on another continent that you never hear of, are they less criminal?



When I used the word miscarriage, I used it as it is medically defined. I do not see what any other definition has to do with my intended use of the word, which was the medical definition of miscarriage. So NONE of the points I was making have to do with stillbirth. Period.

I am not slamming religion. There are religions that do not have a problem with abortion. So what you are saying is that ONE religion should determine policy. And I am saying if you respect people's right to believe in any god they choose, then leave the rest of the believers who do not follow your god's perspective alone. If freedom of religion means anything, it means one religion should NOT dominate public policy at the expense of other people's beliefs. I know many people from many religions who do not have an issue with abortion. This, coupled with the fact that NO religion mandates death rites for a miscarriage seems rather dispositive of this issue. If YOUR religion prohibits something, then don't do it. But don't impose that on people who believe in other religions. What, exactly, gives YOU the right to impose your religious belief on someone else? What makes your religion pre-eminent amongst other religions? Why is your god more important than that of any other person. I come from a religion that predates Christianity and Islam. And I'm not interested in having someone else's religious viewpoint imposed on me politically. If you claim to respect religion then respect the fact that not all religions are in agreement on this topic. And even within religions, not all spiritual leaders and religious scholars are in agreement either. Imposing your religious view as a political matter encroaches on MY freedom of religion.

If one politically defines life beginning at conception, then my tampon example is, in fact, accurate. If it is life at conception then every miscarriage is a death. Every miscarriage (there are 700,000 of them each year in the U.S.) must be considered a death with proper religious rites. Many religions believe that the remains of a human life MUST be buried with proper rites. So, yes, in order to fulfill that religious requirement, a woman would have to save her tampon. What other remains are there to bury with a miscarriage? NONE. So how does one fulfill the religious requirement:

1 Corinthians 15:35-55
It is the same way with the resurrection of the dead. Our earthly bodies are planted in the ground when we die, but they will be raised to live forever. Our bodies are buried in brokenness, but they will be raised in glory. They are buried in weakness, but they will be raised in strength. They are buried as natural human bodies, but they will be raised as spiritual bodies. For just as there are natural bodies, there are also spiritual bodies.
…Then, when our dying bodies have been transformed into bodies that will never die, this Scripture will be fulfilled: "Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?" (Excerpt Verses 42-44; 54-55 NLT)

Please explain to me how anything other than burial of the tampon would fulfill this?

Burial is also a requirement for those of Jewish and Islamic faith.


< Message edited by fucktoyprincess -- 5/18/2012 1:12:47 PM >


_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to RemoteUser)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:15:21 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

 
I question the morality of anyone who couldn't give a shit about any baby/child but their own. Selfish.



I question the morality of anyone who would try to force the mores of their religion on everyone else in violation of the US Constitution.

There are those who claim that a fetus is a human from the moment of conception because of the 5th century AD idea that conception is the moment at which a soul enters the fetus.

Prove the existence of a soul. If one cannot empirically prove that souls exist, then it is impossible to show that it actually enters a fetus, much less when it happens.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:25:40 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
 
Prove the non-existence of a soul. If one cannot empirically prove that souls do not exist, then it is impossible to show that it has not entered a fetus, much less when it happens.

One either believes we have a "soul" or they don't. 



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:30:51 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

 
Prove the non-existence of a soul. If one cannot empirically prove that souls do not exist, then it is impossible to show that it has not entered a fetus, much less when it happens.

One either believes we have a "soul" or they don't. 



That is correct. You believe.

If you cannot prove someting exists, then you must accept the possibility that it doesn't. I accept the possibility of a soul but not the certainty.

If one cannot prove empirically that something exists, then it is ludicrous to base the law of the land on something that MIGHT but possibly doesn't exist.

If we're going to do that, let's put Sasquatch on the Endangered Species List because it MIGHT exist and noone has proven it doesnt.

Laws aren't supposed to be made based on something that MIGHT exist. Somehow, these slipped by because the Fundies screamed loud enough.

Edited because typing with a broken finger sux.

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 5/18/2012 1:31:27 PM >


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:38:17 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
 
Ummm... is abortion legal?!!  Yes!!!

So what does anyone's belief in the "soul" matter to you?!!



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:45:34 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

 
I question the morality of anyone who couldn't give a shit about any baby/child but their own. Selfish.





By this and your previous post you would fully support someone interviening in the child rearing process of a child not their own?
How about someone like don henly who states to all who would listen:
"I would like to find your inner child and kick it's little ass".

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:47:57 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

 
Ummm... is abortion legal?!!  Yes!!!

So what does anyone's belief in the "soul" matter to you?!!



It is legal under certain circumstances and in certain states but more and more, the fundamentalists are forcing their religious beliefs upon others by attempting to restrict this medical procedure. Many of them have as their stated goal to eliminate it altogether in all circumstances. They base this logic on their belief that a human has a 'soul' which enteres the body at the moment of conception. This is a religious belief. forcing this on people who don't share their beliefs is against the US Constitution.

Personally, I'm more libertarian. I think the government needs to stay the hell out of my bedroom and living room. I'm also a fiscal conservative who is fully supportive of government funding of Planned Parenthood. Know why? I'd 1000 times rather see a couple hundred tax dollars go to paying for a D&C than a couple hundred thousand pay to feed, house, educate and quite possibly incarcerate an unwanted child.

It's simple Fiscal Conservativism.

The elimination of a few thousand dollars of Planned Parenthood funding leads directly to the need to spend hundreds of thousands to as much as millions of taxpayer dollars for education and assistance. Classical example of penny smart and dollar dumb Tax and Spend Conservatives.

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 5/18/2012 1:54:06 PM >


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:51:20 PM   
MileHighM


Posts: 400
Joined: 10/8/2009
Status: offline
Yawn!

bible quoting on the beginning of life is a about as interesting as debating circumcision (male not female)---there is no right answer!

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:55:07 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

 
Prove the non-existence of a soul.


Usually about the ninth grade most of us are exposed to an academic course in logic. The first principle of which is that one cannot prove a negative.
Were you not in attendance?



quote:

If one cannot empirically prove that souls do not exist, then it is impossible to show that it has not entered a fetus, much less when it happens.


Thus the progression into the sophmoric concept of the logical falicy

quote:

One either believes we have a "soul" or they don't. 


No, one has faith that there is a soul. Faith is easily described as believing something you have no logical or rational reason to believe.
To believe in the irrational or the illogical seems to be your creed which you would seem intent on infecting those of us with a three digit iq and a pulse.

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:55:17 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

Ummm... is abortion legal?!!  Yes!!!

So what does anyone's belief in the "soul" matter to you?!!




It is legal under certain circumstances...



So you're arguing in favor of partial-birth abortion, then?!! 



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:55:35 PM   
RemoteUser


Posts: 2854
Joined: 5/10/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
When I used the word miscarriage, I used it as it is medically defined. I do not see what any other definition has to do with my intended use of the word, which was the medical definition of miscarriage. So NONE of the points I was making have to do with stillbirth. Period.

I am not slamming religion. There are religions that do not have a problem with abortion. So what you are saying is that ONE religion should determine policy. And I am saying if you respect people's right to believe in any god they choose, then leave the rest of the believers who do not follow your god's perspective alone. If freedom of religion means anything, it means one religion should NOT dominate public policy at the expense of other people's beliefs. I know many people from many religions who do not have an issue with abortion. This, coupled with the fact that NO religion mandates death rites for a miscarriage seems rather dispositive of this issue. If YOUR religion prohibits something, then don't do it. But don't impose that on people who believe in other religions. What, exactly, gives YOU the right to impose your religious belief on someone else? What makes your religion pre-eminent amongst other religions? Why is your god more important than that of any other person. I come from a religion that predates Christianity and Islam. And I'm not interested in having someone else's religious viewpoint imposed on me politically. If you claim to respect religion then respect the fact that not all religions are in agreement on this topic. And even within religions, not all spiritual leaders and religious scholars are in agreement either. Imposing your religious view as a political matter encroaches on MY freedom of religion.

If one politically defines life beginning at conception, then my tampon example is, in fact, accurate. If it is life at conception then every miscarriage is a death. Every miscarriage (there are 700,000 of them each year in the U.S.) must be considered a death with proper religious rites. Many religions believe that the remains of a human life MUST be buried with proper rites. So, yes, in order to fulfill that religious requirement, a woman would have to save her tampon. What other remains are there to bury with a miscarriage? NONE. So how does one fulfill the religious requirement:

1 Corinthians 15:35-55
It is the same way with the resurrection of the dead. Our earthly bodies are planted in the ground when we die, but they will be raised to live forever. Our bodies are buried in brokenness, but they will be raised in glory. They are buried in weakness, but they will be raised in strength. They are buried as natural human bodies, but they will be raised as spiritual bodies. For just as there are natural bodies, there are also spiritual bodies.
…Then, when our dying bodies have been transformed into bodies that will never die, this Scripture will be fulfilled: "Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?" (Excerpt Verses 42-44; 54-55 NLT)

Please explain to me how anything other than burial of the tampon would fulfill this?

Burial is also a requirement for those of Jewish and Islamic faith.


You're kind of enforcing my point that you're only accepting the medical definition, which renders the OP's question useless since it demands only one answer be considered. As for stillborn and miscarriage, one has been used to describe the other before and yes, by medically trained people, so if you don't like the definition fine; but don't label it wrong only because you disagree.

That said, my mouth isn't big enough for all the words you tried to put in it. I never stated anything about one religion. I never said I was religious, so you were not paying attention. It's in black and white. Go back and read it. I mentioned the popular religious view, which just means majority, not everything, and certainly not absolute. Now if that's not you reading into it to attack religion then what is it? If you're that incapable of reading my post, please don't comment on it, it only makes you look bad.

Nor did I try to implicate that your don't have freedom of religion/thought. In fact I would like to see you express it comprehensively, that is to say, stick to what is actually said...

You did make a good effort detailing the tampon example, but it falls apart when you consider the following:

- burial rites vary by religion and even by denomination, you can't lump them together to make your life easier

- if the miscarriage is not witnessed, why is that - and yes here, indulge religion founded by the Bible you chose to quote - is it because G-d doesn't want you to know? Is it the work of the Devil? Do you know for a fact? If not, then don't assume your answer is also factually accurate just because it falls within the confines of what you think you know.

- following through on that, if the miscarriage happens without notice who is to say it didn't pass while urinating? Even women of biblical times removed their leather strap to pee. And where did they pee? On the ground? Well, that satisfies one requirement. Can ground be hallowed? Yup, assuming we stick to the religion you keep referencing. So if one is made aware of the fact then something can be done, if it is thought through, and if it was not you cannot say factually that that isn't because it was meant to be that way. You can only assume there is no G-d and attack from that stance, which makes quoting the Bible just a convenient tool without substance.

In short, you are making broad assumptions about the situation and quoting the Bible only to try and sound right, without allowing for alternative viewpoints. I gave you an alternative: hallow the ground the woman has walked on and urinated on. Hallowing can vary by application so I am trying to be as general as possible. You don't have to like it, but it is feasible.


Edited because I hate typos.




< Message edited by RemoteUser -- 5/18/2012 1:57:32 PM >


_____________________________

There is nothing worse than being right. Instead of being right, then, try to be open. It is more difficult, and more rewarding.


(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 195
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 1:56:41 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

There are religions that do not have a problem with abortion.



Ummm... yeah... and given ABORTION IS LEGAL, exactly what is the point of your rant?

quote:



I am saying if you respect people's right to believe in any god they choose, then leave the rest of the believers who do not follow your god's perspective alone.



Funny thing... it was NOT a "believer" WHO STARTED THIS THREAD with the premise, "Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception", but a NON-BELIEVER (i.e., one of YOUR ilk) who elected NOT TO LEAVE OTHERS WITH A DIFFERENT VIEW ALONE!!! 


quote:



If freedom of religion means anything, it means one religion should NOT dominate public policy at the expense of other people's beliefs. I know many people from many religions who do not have an issue with abortion.



Once again, ABORTION IS LEGAL... thus, no religion is "dominating public policy", is it?!!  What exactly are you railing on about here?!!  You've made quite a show of this... so what is it that YOU want that you're not getting -- legalization of partial-birth abortion or ???





< Message edited by MasterSlaveLA -- 5/18/2012 1:58:31 PM >


_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 196
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 2:01:46 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Aw, fuck, I thought the Bible says a mans life begins at his first blowjob. 


No....that would be a "young man's".

A man's life begins when he first gets laid.

His burden begins when he gets married.

(Which, interestingly, is also the last time he gets laid).

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 197
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 2:02:28 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

So you're arguing in favor of partial-birth abortion, then?!!


Which med school did you learn that term in? Oh wait it is not a medical term but rather a term made up by morons who think they are doctors.
Some of your posts indicate that you are in favor of retroactive abortions.
Why is that?

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 198
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 2:07:10 PM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


Has someone given you the false impression that I'm at all interested in your nonsensical posts?  If so, they lied.



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 199
RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception ... - 5/18/2012 2:07:22 PM   
Twenty9male


Posts: 111
Joined: 5/14/2012
Status: offline
Its another life with feelings, hope, emotions etc, not someone's property.

The woman is just lucky enough to carry it around until birth.
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Twenty9male

I understand your point i just think it's morally bankrupt.

Your whinging as if to say they only cared about the featus, perhaps you should have card about it a bit more and they wouldn't have had to.


Let them get their own damned fetus. This one was hers do decide what to do with, not theirs.

Don't you respect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS? Or are women some sort of "community property"?

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Life does not begin at Fertilization or conception - says the Holy Bible Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094