RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


BBBTBW -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/13/2012 3:59:55 PM)

Personally I find those male parts to be great play toys. I don't want to destroy them and feed them to the dogs. I vote no on your idea of Matriarchy.

The idea I like best was written in a chronicling story by Michael Williams called The Community.

Its big on race (which could easily be changed to gender) and although I am not a race player, I really enjoyed the story Check it out

http://communitymkw.blogspot.com/2007/02/01-family.html




JeffBC -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/13/2012 4:04:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AurumCaminus
for men to get their base needs from women, to put it quite bluntly, we don't need your consent.

ignoring for a moment the million and one questions that the word "consent" brings up, I'd just like to point out that THIS man has an awful lot more needs to be met than blowjobs and those other needs do, in fact, require more than a quick clubbing and back to the cave we go.




David519 -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/13/2012 4:24:14 PM)

Interesting, you state that only the meek would be permitted to repopulate, yet you "forcibly force men to queue".

Cart before the horse perhaps?

I spent nearly 2 decades in the military. Approximately 19 years of that was time spent waiting in line.

I would suggest if you were serious about starting a matriarchal society that you find some like minded souls, chip in and buy a decommissioned Oil Rig in international waters and start a principality (look up the Principality of Sealand)

Personally, if I were to create a patriarchal society where all women were submissive I wouldn't be slicing off any meaty bits or even banning the non-meek. Seriously, what fun would that be?




AurumCaminus -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/13/2012 5:21:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: AurumCaminus
for men to get their base needs from women, to put it quite bluntly, we don't need your consent.

ignoring for a moment the million and one questions that the word "consent" brings up, I'd just like to point out that THIS man has an awful lot more needs to be met than blowjobs and those other needs do, in fact, require more than a quick clubbing and back to the cave we go.


I'm not voting for a descent into savagery either.

But the idea of a Matriarchy based upon the brutal subjugation of men by women is not only horrid, its unworkable.

The physiological balances do not support the objective.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/14/2012 10:50:17 AM)

I would not build a society centered around either matriarchal or a partriarchal concept (both are flawed). There are simply way to many dumbass people of both sexes in the world. (hey, it's my honest answer).




Aswad -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/14/2012 6:37:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I consider The Prince required reading for any dominant.


I never made it through the whole thing.

Does this mean I have to give up my MasterCard until I've dug it out of the library? [:D]

IWYW,
- Aswad.





LookieNoNookie -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/14/2012 7:09:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Blankpain

Morphing the idea of the recent, "if you would establish a new nation" thread, I resumed thinking how best to create a perfect matriarchy where the entire populace willingly conforms to the given ideals in the shortest time possible!

My first thought (of many), would be to allow only the decidedly meek and subservient to repopulate ... based on meeting key criteria in middle life ... whereby the rules would be men at the age of consent are forced to queue naked and quivering, bound hand and foot, while a sperm sample is roughly milked, and then once on its way to cryogenic preservation, the offending meaty parts are efficiently crushed to a pulp or completely removed (at their discretion) and thrown to the dogs - while the thoroughly subjugated eunuch is repaired and sent on his way to be a productive member of our new society.

Mortality may be high - but it is of no matter as it would be less than that which we lose in war today - and - since human nature repeats itself - our ideal matriarchy assumes we can only move forward quickly by changing human nature in a drastic way.

How would YOU ensure the entire male gene pool conforms to YOUR ideals of a perfect matriarchal D/s society.


Ya know...nice fantasy but....watch the world population dwindle by 35% annually when you populate the world with men that don't want to kill dinosaurs and drag them home to show their women how well they conquered the world today....for them.

(Just a simple observation.....from a sub male).




OsideGirl -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/14/2012 7:59:37 PM)

This thread is the perfect example of why 90% of male submissives annoy me.

It's this idea that this (most likely unlived out) fantasy of female superiority, should be everyone else's ideal. Not every man is cut out to be a leader. Not every woman is cut out to be a leader. I have lived and been married into a male dominated relationship for the last 12 years. I understand enough to realize that regardless of how well it suits us, it is not for everybody.

So, I find the blanket assumption that this is all what we're looking for to be offensive.




Aswad -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/14/2012 9:58:18 PM)

~fr~

I would have to say it seems more like a gelding kink than a supremacy thing. Vaguely reminiscent of "Wicked Wanda" (alter ego of Scarlet Witch, up to no good- or way too much good, depending on your preferences- in some author's fantasy), although that was more creative and focused on breasts most of the time. 9000 years of oppression by men without messing with women's bodies and hormones, you'd think a supremacist might credit the idea that it could swing the other way without surgical or chemical interventions. Else, I believe the correct term is "oppressionist", not "supremacist". Which is far more fun than supremacy anyway, whichever way the door swings.

Incidentally, we have continents. There's no reason one can't simply have a class based society instead, and ship people off to the continent that corresponds to their inclination and orientation when they've reached an age where the traits are stable enough to be considered permanent. Let both camps join in on the fun. After all, it's a fantasy. Why not share it?

IWY'allW,
- Aswad.





ResidentSadist -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/14/2012 11:57:23 PM)

Matriarch patriarch bah. For the love of "Tac", we all know cats will rule the world.

[img]http://www.acc.umu.se/~zqad/cats/1188245238-1188061888083.b.jpg[/img]

[img]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Jo7lJoQhtjw/Sm9BldD9YtI/AAAAAAAAIcs/_MlmWDnE8Yg/s400/Cat+God+WQ.gif[/img]


As far as replying seriously to the OP I have waited for the author to attend this thread with replies to determine if it was troll bait or wank fodder.




shallowdeep -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 12:54:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OSideGirl
This thread is the perfect example of why 90% of male submissives annoy me.

An idea proffered by an ostensible lesbian and going oh for two in the thread's "Endorsed by Submissive Men" category is really the best example of such men being annoying? I suddenly feel much better about the classification on my profile! :)

In any event, make it 0/3 on the endorsement front.

I mean, anyone can see that genetic engineering would clearly be more efficient...




mnottertail -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 1:01:07 AM)

I'd slap the bitch around, if it was my matriarchy to rule over. 




PeonForHer -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 3:26:56 AM)

FR

Was this meant to be taken seriously? I just chortled at the OP's idea. Nothing wrong with a bit of weirdness now and then, as far as I'm concerned.




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 3:55:13 AM)

Yes.

Actually, try again. I didn't make it through the first time. A few years later I picked it up again, and voila.

While you are reading, think Master, not Prince, that might help.

But really, I am quite serious, it is highly recommended reading.




OsideGirl -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 7:26:44 AM)

It actually reminded me of stories of the Amazons. How male breeding stock was chosen and they would amputate a limb thinking it would make his penis more powerful.





submaleuk12 -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 8:19:23 AM)

A lot of misnadry in the original post, it's worse than racism imo




Aswad -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 8:36:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

Yes.


Aw, shucks.

Will you take good care of my MasterCard until I'm done? [:D]

It's on the reading list, in any case. My reading just goes very slowly these days.

IWYW,
- Aswad.





ChatteParfaitt -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/15/2012 8:45:36 AM)

<slips Awad's MasterCard down my cleavage for safe keeping>







Aswad -> RE: How would you run your matriarchy so that it conforms to your ideal? (5/16/2012 3:23:54 PM)

Can I retrieve it myself when I'm done reading? [8D]

IWYW,
- Aswad.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875