Yachtie
Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Those people had to start a new country. Go start yours. But to pretend that's the intent of the U.S. Constitution is just Rambo-fantasy crap. Yet again--nobody wants to touch points 2 and 3. That's because the NRA hasn't told you what to say yet. quote:
And (1) they're talking about England; (2) the U.S. HAS that "consent of the governed" in the form of elections (even when people weren't allowed to vote directly, or at all for Senators, and especially not for slaves); (3) same question as before--if they meant this government to be overthrown at will, there would be no such crime as treason. Of course that wasn't the intent. You say that #2 and #3 are not being touched. Ok, lets touch them with a fairly recent example. Hitler came to power via electoral means. Proper under their Constitution at that time. Everything he did to achieve power was lawful. He governed by consent of the governed. There eventually came a time where even his own generals tried to kill him. Hitler called them traitors and had them executed. They knew it was treason by legal stricture, but they also knew it to be patriotic due to circumstances obvious to most. You mistake the argument MM. It has nothing to do with "at will" but when circumstances dictate the necessity. Those circumstances can not qualified as to some exactitude or rule. Neither can the method necessity takes. Those happen unto themselves, when sufficient people have had enough. This is not to even say that all will agree. But that's the way of it. Now, perhaps the French revolution might also be a good example.
< Message edited by Yachtie -- 5/16/2012 10:09:14 AM >
_____________________________
“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC “Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell
|