Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Why Atheism Scares People


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Why Atheism Scares People Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/23/2012 11:30:39 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I think Atheism scares people because they want to believe that there is something after they die, the thought of dying and then there is nothing scares them shitless, the thought that loved ones that have passed away are just dead and gone is pretty horrific, so people want to believe there is more and create deus ex machina

I think it's something deeper than that. We are born with an innate sense of fairness. It has been demonstrated over and over, even in the higher non-human animals. It is in our nature to expect the world to be fair, almost as if we somehow "know" that it should be. Yet this world surely isn't.

So if we are to be able to trust ourselves, to trust our nature, then there must something more, some greater existence in which justice ultimately triumphs. Because otherwise there is a tragic mismatch between our nature and reality. Something is wrong. We don't belong here. We don't fit.

Faith is not a matter of "belief." Belief is something else. Faith is trust. And in the final analysis, it is trust in ourselves and our nature.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 5/23/2012 11:42:24 PM >

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 361
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/23/2012 11:41:56 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
I think you see it too romantic, higher primates also have rules and laws and they enforce them, not so different from what we do.

The God concept seems pretty simple, man can't explain something so we create a deity, when we discovered the whole thunder and lightning stuff, Thor and Zeus became obsolete, our fear of death still exists.

Now look at the basics of almost every religion, they aren't different, it's all about making people's life a bit easier and not have them doing nasty things to each other, even the food laws of various religions make perfect sense - they were created for the environment they lived in and the time being (no refrigerators). How to get people to observe laws without excessive policing and stop them from stealing from each other (property or spouses) and as a result fighting and killing each other (therefore endangering the whole social structure and survival) by having an all powerful deity that will punish them for it, since that punishment didn't come (not every adulterer or thief was struck by lightning, I'd say precious few were), it had to be some terrible thing in the afterlife - oh eternal suffering and fire and brimstone sounds good....

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 362
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/23/2012 11:46:13 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
And the records of societies that have consciously tried to subtract religion from both public and private life--Soviet Russia, Communist China--are not encouraging.

Seems to me that had everything to do with what they were purposely replacing it with.


Or, rather, what they had in common.

"But that requires some religions in particular, to modify the importance of certain doctrine."

The doctrine in question is the doctrine that I get to have a say in your life, beyond what is strictly necessary for us not to be at war (whether as individuals, groups, nations or whatever). Socialists worldwide, for instance, have a tendency to espouse this doctrine, and that includes the secular ones. Which is one of the reasons I don't think this is a religion problem, but a human one.

I don't care what you believe, nor do I care about most of what you do. I just want to live my life without outside interference in my affairs. I don't even understand the desire to impose interference on random strangers I've never met. But sadly some people have convictions- whether it's religion, socialism, antitheism or anything else- that give them a sense of entitlement in my life. And then they try to intervene, make things the way they think they should be. In my life. For me, that is usually the secular oligarchy here. Others may experience more interference from the religious fundies or "conservatives". We should be able to recognize that the problem is that people are pushing, not what they're pushing, and that this is a human problem, not limited to any one dogma.

Humans need to drop the doctrine of entitlement to intervention and interference with free choice.

IWYW,
- Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 363
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/23/2012 11:55:36 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I think you see it too romantic, higher primates also have rules and laws and they enforce them, not so different from what we do.

Well I don't mind being thought a romantic in other circumstances, but not this one. Heh. Society's rules and laws have nothing to do with it. A sense of fairness has been found to be innate in even the youngest of infants. It is built into the brain and at the core of our nature. I don't buy the idea that we invented God as a political expedient, though I certainly wouldn't deny that religion has been used as one.

K.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 364
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/23/2012 11:58:22 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I am the consciousness of beings; and of knowledge, the knowledge of the supreme...
He who sees the supreme Lord existing alike in all beings, is he who truly sees.



I got the reference, and it fits with the rest of the post, sure.

I just didn't get how it was applicable to the "dissolving" comment, which was me saying "dang, I wish I could've written what I'm thinking and then edited it properly, but my ability to do so is slipping away, so I'm going to post this as-is, rather than make an attempt where I bungle what sense is already there and finally discard the post entirely with a sigh."

IWYW,
- Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 365
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 12:06:09 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
I'm sorry, but so far I have found no evidence of the existence of a higher being, I can see reasons why people want one, but again, really not there. Wouldn't say I am an Atheist, more like an Agnostic (everything is possible, some things are just very unlikely if you believe old Albert)...

I just don't get where you get this "sense of fairness unique in only humans" from? Could you give specific examples? Because having had pets whenever my personal circumstances allowed it, I can tell you that pets do care for each other and look out for each other beyond the pride or pack mentality. I had a sick rat and the others groomed him and brought him food, that's very compassionate, maybe not fair but compassionate and not unique to humans. When I'm upset my cats and dogs come to me and try to lick me and cuddle as they can sense it, a lot of humans can't.

Seriously, if you're buying into the "crown of creation" thing, fair dues, but my personal opinion is, that if we were created by a superior being and that was the best s/he could do, that's pretty fucked up and I hope we were only an experiment and a learning process. Also if we were created, then why did we have to go through millenniums of evolution?

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 366
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 12:16:47 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

[...]a glaring contradiction in Christian theology about the nature of God. Either he willfully permits natural evil or he is not omnipotent.


Or what you consider natural evil has a purpose (common view in conventional Christian theology).
Or what you consider natural evil is a glass half full (common view in conventional Christian theology).
Or what you refer to as omnipotence is merely what some shepherds thought of as such millenia ago.
Or what you call willful is nothing of the sort.

That's four possible refutations right there, without even touching on the argument.

quote:

In Christian theology no life is totally without meaning? You should read up on Calvin then, on unconditional election, or predestination. Even Paul spoke of election in Thessalonians.


And predestination is one of several areas in which conventional Christian theology is split.

For instance, Catholics reject predestination.

quote:

Nobody truly dies because the soul is immortal? But what then? A little suffering of the children is okay?


Pretty much. Conventional Christian theology holds that the suffering and its effects are essentially washed away in the afterlife.

Reincarnation theology has other views on suffering that similarly obviate the inherently distasteful about suffering.

It also bears mentioning that people rarely kill themselves merely to escape suffering, so assuming one sticks with the conventional theology on the point of creation, a suffering life is pretty much better than a life not lived due to the absence of creation, which of course makes it a question of a good world vs a prefect world. This again relies on your assumption of intent in any case, without which there is no issue either way.

quote:

In any event, your position was that it is WE who invest meaning into our own lives. Now you contradict yourself when it is convenient to your argument and say no life is totally without meaning. Which is it?


He's addressing your arguments, in the frame of reference you supplied.

A frame of reference that is neither yours, nor his (nor mine).

IWYW,
- Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 367
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 12:19:17 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I just don't get where you get this "sense of fairness unique in only humans" from?

I never said that. In fact, I specifically said that "it has been demonstrated over and over, even in the higher non-human animals."

Trust me, I know, I have a cat.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

if we were created by a superior being

I don't know of any religion that says we were created. Even in the Bible, which some people insist on reading as if it was a science textbook, only our body was "created." A human-shaped mud-pie is still just a human-shaped mud-pie. Life is another matter.

K.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 368
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 12:39:35 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
Well, you still fail to give specific examples...

I am quite interested in religions in general and read most of the important works, and that includes the Bible - hmmmm, how would you explain then

quote:

By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work.


Now if memory serves right, man was "created" on the sixth day...

Genesis 2:7
quote:

"And The Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being."


Still can't think of any religion who claims we were created?

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 369
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 1:51:52 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

Genesis 2:7
quote:

"And The Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being."


Still can't think of any religion who claims we were created?

You just quoted one. The body of man was formed "from the dust of the ground," but it wasn't alive, wasn't a person, wasn't Man, until the breath (pneuma, spirit) of God entered into it. And that was NOT created.

K.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 370
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 1:55:45 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
Sure, you just make something and give it life and you don't create - sorry, can't follow your logic, but if it works for you, it's fine, it just doesn't work for my rational mind...

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 371
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 2:18:08 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

Sure, you just make something and give it life and you don't create - sorry, can't follow your logic, but if it works for you, it's fine, it just doesn't work for my rational mind...

Yeah, that must be the problem. Your mind is "rational". Thanks for playing.

K.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 372
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 2:32:55 AM   
MasterSlaveLA


Posts: 3991
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

...so far I have found no evidence of the existence of a higher being



Assuming you're an Atheist, why would you -- as one wouldn't find a Big Mac at a Pizza Hut either.



_____________________________

It's only kinky the first time!!!

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 373
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 7:25:24 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
[...]a glaring contradiction in Christian theology about the nature of God. Either he willfully permits natural evil or he is not omnipotent.

Or what you consider natural evil has a purpose (common view in conventional Christian theology).
Or what you consider natural evil is a glass half full (common view in conventional Christian theology).
Or what you refer to as omnipotence is merely what some shepherds thought of as such millenia ago.
Or what you call willful is nothing of the sort.

That's four possible refutations right there, without even touching on the argument.


Those aren't refutations, they're excuses for why god either willfully permits natural evil or isn't omnipotent.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 374
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 7:25:49 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

By introducing all-encompassing intent, you are using an assumption of conventional theology that I reject as equivalent to Alice's bad habit: something that it is advantageous to be rid of. It is, of course, possible to posit reasons for shit happening above and beyond the ups and downs of the great adventure. But it will suffice to posit that God didn't intend every tiny detail of a reality that sustains a form of life that had presumably not existed prior to said reality.

Maybe he just saw that it was good....

It is, isn't it?


You raise a strawman equivalence between God and Alice and the nature of their effects on others. Alice sets in motion in your view a chain reaction through relationships. However, God is traditionally in a relationship with the whole of his creation and simultaneously with each individual thing and being in his creation. Catholics assume a perfect creator and yet his creation is riddled with imperfections beyond human free will. I was not talking of every tiny detail of reality; I referred to some seemingly profound events in nature.

As to your question about life being good . . . a pov drenched with Western bias. Maybe not so good if you are living in a cardboard box on a street corner in Calcutta begging for morsels and ravaged with worms.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 375
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 7:30:38 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
[...]a glaring contradiction in Christian theology about the nature of God. Either he willfully permits natural evil or he is not omnipotent.

Or what you consider natural evil has a purpose (common view in conventional Christian theology).
Or what you consider natural evil is a glass half full (common view in conventional Christian theology).
Or what you refer to as omnipotence is merely what some shepherds thought of as such millenia ago.
Or what you call willful is nothing of the sort.

That's four possible refutations right there, without even touching on the argument.


Those aren't refutations, they're excuses for why god either willfully permits natural evil or isn't omnipotent.


Yes. Conventional apologetics quite in line with the "higher purpose which man can not know" excuse. As old as Job.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 376
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 7:38:52 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Pretty much. Conventional Christian theology holds that the suffering and its effects are essentially washed away in the afterlife.


If you have been a good boy (Catholic "works") or if you have been chosen (Protestant "grace")

Otherwise, everlasting pain and suffering in the fires of Hell for you, bro. Your soul damned for eternity.


(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 377
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/24/2012 11:18:20 AM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I think you see it too romantic, higher primates also have rules and laws and they enforce them, not so different from what we do.

Well I don't mind being thought a romantic in other circumstances, but not this one. Heh. Society's rules and laws have nothing to do with it. A sense of fairness has been found to be innate in even the youngest of infants. It is built into the brain and at the core of our nature. I don't buy the idea that we invented God as a political expedient, though I certainly wouldn't deny that religion has been used as one.

K.



Fairness? Or selfishness, and rage that things don't go our way all the time?

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 378
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/25/2012 1:36:15 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

Those aren't refutations, they're excuses for why god either willfully permits natural evil or isn't omnipotent.


Yes. Conventional apologetics quite in line with the "higher purpose which man can not know" excuse. As old as Job.


I did explicitly say "conventional", didn't I?

I feel that I've been pretty clear I don't stand for conventional theology.

But, sure, let's have a look at some of these apologetics with a less conventional eye.

Purpose apologetic:
If perspectives like Hinduism, Buddhism and even New Age are taken into account, all ideas that have been tossed around throughout the history of theology, then you're basically going through several rounds in a cosmic rehab center to accumulate the experiences your fundamental essence will require to improve. Much as I pointed out we will eventually create ourselves to serve that purpose: reduced complexity simulations to perform therapy and rehabilitation on criminals and mentally ill individuals. If the technology was here, now, my own country would definitely be using it already. Variations on this perspective have been put forth by Gnostics and, later, as the Cathar heresy— modern understanding merely illuminates possibilities better.

Glass half full apologetic:
The existence of life beats the absence of life, hands down. If, as conventional theology posits, God is ultimately responsible for the existence of life, then that is a net good in and of itself. Now, I've never created a universe, so I wouldn't know whether there are constraints on how you can make one, or what the beings within can be like, or how their lives might be. I assume you have no such experience yourself, but you're still inclined to assume that God intentionally created the world with the elements which you find to negate the notion of good in the act of creation. Bearing in mind that the notion of omniscience was coined at a time when humans had a very limited view of what might be possible, it'd be interesting if you could expound more on the basis for your assumptions, and how they make it untenable to assert that creating this universe constitutes a good act.

Omnipotence apologetic:
I'm not going to defend the idea of literal omnipotence. It's too far removed from my experience to be able to conceive of what a literal omnipotence might entail or imply. But I will offer an analogy along the lines of the earlier example of a simulation, but using current generation MMOs instead to illustrate: the operators at Blizzard are, in theory, literally omnipotent as far as the World of Warcraft game goes.

They can change the code and the dataset as much as they like, those being the defining elements of the game as it is experienced by the players and the characters in the game. That is, insofar as the incredibly primitive logic of the characters inside of the game could be said to perceive (i.e. receive input) at all, compared to us on the outside. An analogy which can be gainfully compared and contrasted with the conventional notion of humans being unable to comprehend "the will of God" and all that, just like those characters.

Returning to the question of Blizzard's omnipotence in WoW. In practice, the effort involved in radically changing the game, both in terms of the content and/or premise of the game, is well beyond what will practically be realized. Further, it will be limited by the ideas of the creators of the game, and there are business concerns involved. Many players would quit if the game changed far too much for their tastes, or in a different direction than what they appreciate. These are concerns that do not limit the ability to make a change, but they do limit the viability of a given change.

In short, omnipotence is a big can of worms and more complex than commonly understood five thousand years ago. I don't see why we need to throw in the notion that God exists in a vacuum when the notion of omnipotence is- by definition- confined to the inside of this universe. This universe may well be a science fair project sitting on some outside-of-universe kid's desk at school, a somewhat miffed teacher complaining about how the whole dark matter thing was an ugly hack to make up for starting the whole project too late to permit a more natural solution to the inflation problem, and that it wasn't nice to poke his head in to disturb the evolution of life.

Intent apologetic:
While we humans may like to think we're the first thing on everyone's mind, it's quite conceivable that we're little more than chance (as the atheist worldview puts forth). Or, in the theological frame of reference, it's equally conceivable that God didn't set out to make life so much as simply noticed he had. Play around with a petri dish, so to speak. Hence the whole "saw that it was good" rhetoric. Would you rather "he" say "aw, fuck it, this isn't perfect" and flush it all down the toilet?

In summary:
Apologetics is a convenient term from the inside. I find it more interesting to speculate on possibilities from the perspective of putting my mindspace on the outside and looking in. In short, "what might I do in God's shoes?" and "what might God face in his/her/its own reality?" and so forth. Which is the complaint directed at Job: if you can't do the job yourself, you're probably underequipped to criticize it gainfully. That goes for just about any job. Which is why I have subjected myself to things ranging from anal sex and deepthroating to near drowning and sewing on my own arm, in order to have an idea what I put a partner through when I do something and to be able to gauge what they're doing and how that fits with the mindspace the activity is putting them in. I cannot, however, put myself in the position of creating a universe to evaluate that properly. Yet.

Stop looking at Christianity as a prescriptive thing full of answers, and start looking at it as a bag of questions, like those who made it did.

Organized religions are no different from other organizations, and equally prone to losing their way.

For comparison, how's that whole Land of the Free thing working out for you?

That's organizations doing to ideals what organizations do.

IWYW,
- Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 379
RE: Why Atheism Scares People - 5/25/2012 3:02:37 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

If you have been a good boy (Catholic "works") or if you have been chosen (Protestant "grace")


Yeah, the specifics vary from denomination to denomination, and are at times controversial inside a given denomination.

I tend to think that regardless of such concerns, the right thing is to be all you can be, including being a good boy, for the simple reason that the right thing is the right thing. I'm not concerned with "sin" (i.e. gross misses), or with "salvation", or whatever. Nor am I inclined to act a particular way to gain some supposed reward, or to avoid some supposed punishment. If, by chance, some sort of afterlife should await (a big if, not one to base life on), and said afterlife should be subject to some sort of judgment (yet another big if, again not one to base life on), then I will be judged as who and what I am. That's either good enough or not, and I won't compromise myself to fit someone else's standards.

If the big guy wants something, he can tell me and I might be inclined to listen (after verifying that I'm not hallucinating), seeing as I'm a rather big fan and all. But whatever may or may not have been said in the past, the best we can hope for at present is that a core idea is still present there. And what I read as the core idea happens to agree with my take on things.

quote:

Otherwise, everlasting pain and suffering in the fires of Hell for you, bro. Your soul damned for eternity.


Yeah, yanno, the original was that if you "failed", you would simply cease to exist. Hell and all that was invented later. Keep all the people in line with a handy threat or two. It works for most people, what with the law and all that being based on it. I stick with an idea of right and wrong. If doing the right thing earns me a spanking, so be it.

Anyway, it's arguably a useful idea for the vast majority of people if you change the politics in it (e.g. patriarchy), since it's a well established fact that people who believe their actions to be observed, or who believe their actions will be judged later on, make a lot better decisions and exhibit a lot more discipline in sticking to their better decisions. The two problems with that, of course, is a combination of a lack of sufficient belief in it being so and a doctrine that has accumulated a lot of politics over time, much of it all fucked up.

I'm sure you're familiar with the fact that the original pantheons were those of Ea (later El) and Asherah, Ba'al Hadad and Anat, Leviathan, the melachim... oh, and this guy called Yahweh, who became fairly popular later on, recast as Yahweh Elohim after a merger with El in terms of the cults that worshipped them. You could go back further, of course, if you're going to skip on some requirements of continuity, as the cult of El goes back through the days of Marduk to Ea, Anu, Enlil, Ninlil and Enki, and so on. To say that a few things were changed along the way would be a gross understatement, and one of the main changes was that a few central redactors took out a lot of the original diversity, harped on women, and went amok with the whole monotheism bit.

The New Testament era reintroduces the notion of an unseen deity behind the pantheon, consigning the rest of the various gods and goddesses to the role of intermediaries and human ideas and so forth, and makes an attempt at reintroducing some of the feminine sides of the religion. The Romans do not approve overmuch of this, being extremely patriarchal, and the Catholics go through several changes from the very beginning, including one guy that was driven almost exclusively by his poor relations to women, and the whole thing gets buried in politics.

Hell is one of many tools used to get a political result, unrelated to the core idea through the ages, which is pretty gnostic in nature.

The details of what kind of sex you choose to have is secondary to the greater whole of what kind of relationship you have.

The bible is about life, and people make it all about death, which is missing the point (the very definition of sin).

IWYW,
- Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 380
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Why Atheism Scares People Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109