Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Ironic or not?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Ironic or not? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 6:40:51 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
I am a Gandhian by nature - peaceful nonviolence, and all that. And I think to attack people who are simply sitting down to eat - regardless of what they were talking about, offends my personal sensibilities, although I am certainly far from any kind of skinhead/nazi sympathizer.

But I am aware that historically, peaceful nonviolence cannot always be successful against certain types of threats. Nazi Germany is a good example. Going along for the ride meant a one-way train to Auschwitz. So obviously, at some point, people are morally allowed to respond to hate and evil with violence. Otherwise they will be slaughtered. I am still trying to sort out in my own mind when that "tipping point" is. At what point is it self-defense?

All I can say is, without knowing more, the above case is not an example of point at which violence is necessary.

In general, I am against violence unless absolutely justified.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 7:41:48 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Here's something I did "like" about the guys that were caught. They were white. So, at least 5 white guys were caught attacking a supposed white pride group. That speaks to their stance against racism.
Are you really saying white guys can't be against white supremacy?


Actually, no. I'm very glad that the people who were coming out against white supremacy were white. The quotes around "like" were because I didn't like how they decided to show their stance.

quote:


But, here's what they were charged with:
    Five of the attackers were caught and have now been charged with aggravated battery, mob action and criminal damage to property, all felonies.

Well, yes.


I wasn't complaining that any of those didn't apply.

quote:

Now, I could be wrong, but racism was at the heart of these attacks, right?
I think you are wrong. Coming out against racism isn't itself racist. What reason do you have to attribute these attacks to the victims' race, rather than their political views? Nevermind, I'll answer that myself. None, apparently, because many of the people charged with this assault against white supremists were themselves white, as you said yourself.


Politics? Racism is now politics? Seriously?

quote:


There was no mention of hate crime accusations, though it is clearly a case of an attack because of racism.
Because an attack "because of racism" (as heinous as it may be) is neverthetheless NOT a "hate crime", at least by the Justice Department's definition of the term "hate crime":
"Hate crime is the violence of intolerance and bigotry, intended to hurt and intimidate someone because of their race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, or disability. (You will notice that "political views" is NOT on the list."
http://www.justice.gov/crs/pubs/htecrm.htm



Show me where political views and racism are the same. These people were gathering together because they were members of the Illinois European Heritage Association. European, at least to me, speaks of a particular national origin. Or, is that just a political thing?

quote:

Lastly, where are the "Reverends" Sharpton and Jackson?
Probably too smart to endose assault, no matter who it was against.

Pam


Actually, they aren't smart enough to know better. I do know why they weren't here. That was completely tongue-in-cheek. It's the same reason they don't show up when a white person is attacked due to his/her being white. It is only when blacks are attacked by whites, or can be construed to be whites (you know, like the "white Hispanics/Latino's").

I am going to make the claim right here and right now. I am a racist. I fully believe one race to be far superior to all others. Of course, I am talking about the Human race, not some subset thereof.

The patrons of the diner were not doing anything wrong. Their ideas, if they are about white power, white supremacy, or pro Nazi, can be stupid, ignorant and divisive. Holding those opinions does not open them up for attack because of those beliefs.

[Sidebar]
Pam, I want to commend you on using a face pic for your profile. You are not afraid to show who you are. I like that confidence. And, well, you're definitely not hard on the eyes.
[/Sidebar]

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 7:46:32 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

Your point, assuming you are capable of one, welcome any time.
So let's have what you are really wanting to say here.
Bring it on.


I wasn't sure the laws were being applied fairly. Interesting that others were capable of gleaning my angle and you couldn't. But, whatever ideas you think I was angling towards, were probably wrong (I still hold out the possibility you were correct).


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 7:53:30 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Actually, they aren't smart enough to know better. I do know why they weren't here. That was completely tongue-in-cheek. It's the same reason they don't show up when a white person is attacked due to his/her being white. It is only when blacks are attacked by whites, or can be construed to be whites (you know, like the "white Hispanics/Latino's").

So you show up to fill in those blanks.   Al Whitey or Reverend Cracker, what's your pleasure? Or, should we just call you the other white meat?



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 8:18:51 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
 


There`s a lot of qualities humans have that don`t lend themselves to being superior.

Hate,murder,war,degrading the earth ,prejudice,etc. are not found in many other species.

I heard that rats come the closest to having those qualitys.

What`s interesting is the OP mentioning Al and Jessie and then wondering why he`s being bashed for using racial code words.

Well played, my man....well played.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 8:36:01 AM   
stellauk


Posts: 1360
Status: offline
I see this as a crime.

It doesn't matter what views either party held, nobody should have been attacked.



_____________________________

Usually when you have all the answers for something nobody is interested in listening.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 10:07:06 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Actually, they aren't smart enough to know better. I do know why they weren't here. That was completely tongue-in-cheek. It's the same reason they don't show up when a white person is attacked due to his/her being white. It is only when blacks are attacked by whites, or can be construed to be whites (you know, like the "white Hispanics/Latino's").
So you show up to fill in those blanks.   Al Whitey or Reverend Cracker, what's your pleasure? Or, should we just call you the other white meat?


Nice. Real nice. Would much rather you read what I write and not read what you want to read. The "Rev.'s" Sharpton and Jackson are jokes. They should show up at every racial injustice, regardless of race, if they are truly against racism (in general).

And, if you had read my writings, I am not condemning the attackers for their beliefs. I'm condemning them over their actions. I agree with their beliefs, but disagree with their actions. The Neo Nazi's held a rally in Toledo, Ohio in '05. All Hell broke loose and there was a 4 hour riot. The cops were belittled for protecting the Nazi's, and then sued by the Nazi's for ending the rally early. I don't know who initiated the violence, but the Nazi's have every right anyone else has to do what they want, as long as it's not infringing on the rights of others. Even if they have some ignorant, pig-headed belief that they are superior simply because of their skin color.



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 10:08:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And you show up at this one why?   I am sitting here reading what you are writing.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 10:26:53 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
And you show up at this one why?   I am sitting here reading what you are writing.


Because I see an injustice being done and laws not being applied evenly. Actually, I didn't "show up" at it, just posted it here. I didn't initiate anything about other things because, well, others already had. I posted on Facebook in support of a black professional (don't recall his career, but it doesn't matter) in Dayton, Ohio who had received a noose in the mail from some skinhead out west. Racism is racism. I don't care which side is in the wrong. It's still racism. Affirmative Action was important when it started, to counter the racism. But, AA is a racist program in and of itself. I understand its goals, and agree with the over-arching principles, but I disagree with the methodology.

You may look around and see black Americans, or white Americans, Native Americans, purple Americans, green Americans, etc. I don't. I see Americans. I will stand for the rights of Americans. I will stand up for the rights of Humans, over any other race.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 10:59:55 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And Sharpton and Jackson did likewise, and didn't post it.   It may alarm you to note that they are black men who specialize (rightly or wrongly) in the (percieved or actual) injustices done to black folk even if it is black on black.  Much as you are railing about the white on white injustice here, (rightly or wrongly; percieved or actual).



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 11:23:56 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
I am little confused here, does being a group that promotes "White pride" equal to "White Surpremist".  There are groups that promote ethnic pride.  Like the Sons of Norway we show pride in our historical culture.  We are not saying we are superior, we are just educating people on how
Scandinavians lived.  I also attend Scottish Gathering, one is up this weekend.  The Scottish Gathering has the same mission as the Sons of Normay, educate people on all things Scotish. 

I have experienced negativity from people, especially in activities with the Sons of Norway when after an event we have gone to resturant to eat.  We are in costume, weapons are left in the car.  In the resturant we have had people come to us and state their dislike for what they think we are doing, sometimes that were are promoting white supremacy, which we are not.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 11:36:05 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

I am little confused here, does being a group that promotes "White pride" equal to "White Surpremist".  There are groups that promote ethnic pride.  Like the Sons of Norway we show pride in our historical culture.  We are not saying we are superior, we are just educating people on how
Scandinavians lived.  I also attend Scottish Gathering, one is up this weekend.  The Scottish Gathering has the same mission as the Sons of Normay, educate people on all things Scotish. 

I have experienced negativity from people, especially in activities with the Sons of Norway when after an event we have gone to resturant to eat.  We are in costume, weapons are left in the car.  In the resturant we have had people come to us and state their dislike for what they think we are doing, sometimes that were are promoting white supremacy, which we are not.


I think there is a huge difference between an organization that is meant to promote cultural heritage, such as Sons of Norway, and one that is organized around the concept of "white pride". Those who immigrated from Norway and who are descendants of those immigrants, would have a particular experience around assimilation, around maintaining their culture, language, etc. that I can completely understand an organization designed to celebrate your culture and its history in America.

I feel historically, the black pride movement is also similar. When you have been enslaved and subjugated in the past, and you are also a minority in a particular geographic area, I think it makes sense to identify with that shared history. So in my mind, blacks in America who are descended from slaves, share a unique history, regardless of what part of Africa they may have originated from, and regardless of whether they are of mixed background.

I am trying to understand what white pride means in the context of America? People descended from the Puritans have a completely different cultural and historical perspective as compared to Italian-Americans or Irish-Americans who came through Ellis Island, as compared to German Jews who fled Nazi Germany, etc. etc. etc. What exactly is the cultural and historical experience that they share, that is so important that they need to have a group? I don't think it is helpful to view white Americans as one big monolith.

Look, maybe others have another perspective on this to offer up, but I am having a hard time seeing a white pride group as anything other than a racist group. And I will re-iterate what I said in my prior post - that I oppose the violence mentioned in the OP. Deplorable.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 11:39:48 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I am trying to understand what white pride means in the context of America? People descended from the Puritans have a completely different cultural and historical perspective as compared to Italian-Americans or Irish-Americans who came through Ellis Island, as compared to German Jews who fled Nazi Germany, etc. etc. etc. What exactly is the cultural and historical experience that they share, that is so important that they need to have a group? I don't think it is helpful to view white Americans as one big monolith.

Not wishing to snark, but I don't think the white surpremacists are having anything to do with jews (whether Germanic or east European in origin) any more than they want their sister marrying a negro.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 1:20:43 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro
I am little confused here, does being a group that promotes "White pride" equal to "White Surpremist".  There are groups that promote ethnic pride.  Like the Sons of Norway we show pride in our historical culture.  We are not saying we are superior, we are just educating people on how
Scandinavians lived.  I also attend Scottish Gathering, one is up this weekend.  The Scottish Gathering has the same mission as the Sons of Normay, educate people on all things Scotish. 
I have experienced negativity from people, especially in activities with the Sons of Norway when after an event we have gone to resturant to eat.  We are in costume, weapons are left in the car.  In the resturant we have had people come to us and state their dislike for what they think we are doing, sometimes that were are promoting white supremacy, which we are not.


Let's start out by my saying that I have no idea if this group is about white "pride" or "supremacy." It is linked to another group, called StormFront, which I am proud to say I hadn't heard of until reading this article. If, in fact, the Illinois European Heritage Association (which may or may not include blacks that have been born in European countries since peoples began moving all over the globe), is a racist, white supremacy organization, it still doesn't authorize others to attack them.

From your description (and that is all I have to go on), the Sons of Norway group is not a "white pride" or "white supremacist" group.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
And Sharpton and Jackson did likewise, and didn't post it. It may alarm you to note that they are black men who specialize (rightly or wrongly) in the (percieved or actual) injustices done to black folk even if it is black on black. Much as you are railing about the white on white injustice here, (rightly or wrongly; percieved or actual).


And I will continue to hold Sharpton and Jackson as race-baiters until they start standing up against all forms of racial injustice.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 1:24:01 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
As we will you, based upon what you have done here to date.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 1:25:29 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Let's start out by my saying that I have no idea if this group is about white "pride" or "supremacy." It is linked to another group, called StormFront, which I am proud to say I hadn't heard of until reading this article.

You need to be paying more attention, then. These cunts are out to co-opt you and every other honky in your country, and they take silence as assent. It's the one thing the wankers are good at.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 1:25:40 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I am trying to understand what white pride means in the context of America? People descended from the Puritans have a completely different cultural and historical perspective as compared to Italian-Americans or Irish-Americans who came through Ellis Island, as compared to German Jews who fled Nazi Germany, etc. etc. etc. What exactly is the cultural and historical experience that they share, that is so important that they need to have a group? I don't think it is helpful to view white Americans as one big monolith.

Not wishing to snark, but I don't think the white surpremacists are having anything to do with jews (whether Germanic or east European in origin) any more than they want their sister marrying a negro.


Well, that was kind of my point - whites are not a monolithic group.....

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 1:34:00 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Fair enough.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 5:18:58 PM   
Mupainurpleasure


Posts: 393
Joined: 4/12/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

I am little confused here, does being a group that promotes "White pride" equal to "White Surpremist".  There are groups that promote ethnic pride.  Like the Sons of Norway we show pride in our historical culture.  We are not saying we are superior, we are just educating people on how
Scandinavians lived.  I also attend Scottish Gathering, one is up this weekend.  The Scottish Gathering has the same mission as the Sons of Normay, educate people on all things Scotish. 

I have experienced negativity from people, especially in activities with the Sons of Norway when after an event we have gone to resturant to eat.  We are in costume, weapons are left in the car.  In the resturant we have had people come to us and state their dislike for what they think we are doing, sometimes that were are promoting white supremacy, which we are not.

if the group is a stormfront affiliate yea it does if it's promoting your norse heritage go for it brother! I can trace my roots back to the viking invasion of normandy and my family name directly to a coastal villaige we ...ahhh peaceably settled in from there my half went to england....also peaceably like and it so happened some nice english gents felt they deserved the procedes from Hooten Abbey... and named a villaige after them because everyonre love the new Norman neighbors! and half stayed in France and I used to tease my Dad about the cousin who helped burn ol Joan to a crisp

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Ironic or not? - 5/24/2012 5:56:34 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Actually, they aren't smart enough to know better. I do know why they weren't here. That was completely tongue-in-cheek. It's the same reason they don't show up when a white person is attacked due to his/her being white. It is only when blacks are attacked by whites, or can be construed to be whites (you know, like the "white Hispanics/Latino's").
So you show up to fill in those blanks.   Al Whitey or Reverend Cracker, what's your pleasure? Or, should we just call you the other white meat?


Nice. Real nice. Would much rather you read what I write and not read what you want to read. The "Rev.'s" Sharpton and Jackson are jokes. They should show up at every racial injustice, regardless of race, if they are truly against racism (in general).

And, if you had read my writings, I am not condemning the attackers for their beliefs. I'm condemning them over their actions. I agree with their beliefs, but disagree with their actions. The Neo Nazi's held a rally in Toledo, Ohio in '05. All Hell broke loose and there was a 4 hour riot. The cops were belittled for protecting the Nazi's, and then sued by the Nazi's for ending the rally early. I don't know who initiated the violence, but the Nazi's have every right anyone else has to do what they want, as long as it's not infringing on the rights of others. Even if they have some ignorant, pig-headed belief that they are superior simply because of their skin color.





Ummmmm....this.......is a racial injustice?

How?




_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Ironic or not? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125